User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:41:11 PM EDT
[#1]
Lol
Twitter is private, it is their call if they want to allow it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:41:39 PM EDT
[#2]
That only applies to the official White House / Office of the President account and not his personal Donald Trump account, right?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:41:51 PM EDT
[#3]
Well if that's the case, I had my first amendment rights violated by the local Sheriff when I (politely) criticized him on facebook
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:42:11 PM EDT
[#4]
This will be good. Especially the link to the story......
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:43:06 PM EDT
[#5]
interesting ruling, not sure i buy how the 1st amendment comes into play here
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:43:19 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well if that's the case, I had my first amendment rights violated by the local Sheriff when I (politely) criticized him on facebook |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:44:53 PM EDT
[#7]
Then by Extension Twitter can't ban anyone.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:45:34 PM EDT
[#8]
I wonder if it's the same one from Hawaii?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:46:07 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Im banned from Diane Feinstein and Maxine Waters facebook pages. Time to sue I guess. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Well if that's the case, I had my first amendment rights violated by the local Sheriff when I (politely) criticized him on facebook Either it applies to all or none. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:46:55 PM EDT
[#10]
I'm banned from a Facebook group by a local city council for asking why they have racist hiring policies lol
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:46:59 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That only applies to the official White House / Office of the President account and not his personal Donald Trump account, right? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:46:59 PM EDT
[#12]
4D happenings?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:47:59 PM EDT
[#13]
Is this going to work out like that judge thinks it will considering the extent to which twitter, fb, etc. censor the right? What's he saying? That social media are public fora where speech can't be restricted?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:48:41 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
interesting ruling, not sure i buy how the 1st amendment comes into play here |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:48:50 PM EDT
[#15]
Does that ruling extend to other social media? That could get far reaching and really be used to put a crimp in the leftist agenda. See Youtube banning gun channels.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:49:23 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Im banned from Diane Feinstein and Maxine Waters facebook pages. Time to sue I guess. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Well if that's the case, I had my first amendment rights violated by the local Sheriff when I (politely) criticized him on facebook Guess it's time to sue too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:49:34 PM EDT
[#17]
So 1st amendment applies to Twitter but 2nd doesn't apply to ARs......got it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:50:06 PM EDT
[#18]
Bullshit
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:50:42 PM EDT
[#19]
Didn't read but
El Oh El |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:50:59 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Nope. Claiming 1st amendment - if it holds than no politician should be able to block anyone - the 4chan trolls are off the leash Oh wait I cant afford a laywer 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:51:05 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So 1st amendment applies to Twitter but 2nd doesn't apply to ARs......got it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:52:26 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Im banned from Diane Feinstein and Maxine Waters facebook pages. Time to sue I guess. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:52:44 PM EDT
[#23]
that kneeling senator got me banned from facebook.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:53:44 PM EDT
[#24]
SLIPPERY SLOPE this judge just opened up!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:54:26 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Well looks like I get to sue Diane Frankenstein Finestein and Mad Maxine Waters for banning me on facebook. Oh wait I cant afford a laywer
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:55:12 PM EDT
[#26]
He should just ignore this asshole judge, Obama never abided by courts unless they ruled in his favor, pound sand, enforce your own rule.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:55:52 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Nope. Claiming 1st amendment - if it holds than no politician should be able to block anyone - the 4chan trolls are off the leash
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:57:08 PM EDT
[#28]
Quoted:
This is on the APs Twitter.
The 1A protects people from actions of the government which limit speech. Trump/Fed. Gov. isn't making a law about what critics can say. Trump/Gov. isn't preventing critics from speaking to people who want to listen. Trump/Gov isn't taking any punitive action against critics, Trump is just ignoring them. Would be curious to see how the judge would respond to Trump blocking no one but turning off all Twitter notifications. If Trump merely tweets and never looks at the responses/notifications, it has the same effect as selective blocking. Is this judge going to magically require Trump to read all of the Twitter responses? Judges should stick to law and not engage in fiction writing from the bench. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:57:18 PM EDT
[#29]
What about the judge's Twitter?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:58:19 PM EDT
[#30]
Haha, know we can troll all public office commies.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:58:47 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Nope. Claiming 1st amendment - if it holds than no politician should be able to block anyone - the 4chan trolls are off the leash The trolling that is about to unleash should be glorious. A lot of people won't be able to stand the heat and might quit Twitter. A decline in users/usage would be bad for them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:59:22 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Where is Nolo? Can we all afford to throw him some money? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:59:45 PM EDT
[#33]
Exactly the decision I'd expect from a 74 year old boomer. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 1:59:55 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
interesting ruling, not sure i buy how the 1st amendment comes into play here Their argument is that blocking people on twitter violates that part. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 2:00:15 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'd have to read the judge's opinion, but I call bullshit. The 1A protects people from actions of the government which limit speech. Trump/Fed. Gov. isn't making a law about what critics can say. Trump/Gov. isn't preventing critics from speaking to people who want to listen. Trump/Gov isn't taking any punitive action against critics, Trump is just ignoring them. Would be curious to see how the judge would respond to Trump blocking no one but turning off all Twitter notifications. If Trump merely tweets and never looks at the responses/notifications, it has the same effect as selective blocking. Is this judge going to magically require Trump to read all of the Twitter responses? Judges should stick to law and not engage in fiction writing from the bench. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
This is on the APs Twitter.
The 1A protects people from actions of the government which limit speech. Trump/Fed. Gov. isn't making a law about what critics can say. Trump/Gov. isn't preventing critics from speaking to people who want to listen. Trump/Gov isn't taking any punitive action against critics, Trump is just ignoring them. Would be curious to see how the judge would respond to Trump blocking no one but turning off all Twitter notifications. If Trump merely tweets and never looks at the responses/notifications, it has the same effect as selective blocking. Is this judge going to magically require Trump to read all of the Twitter responses? Judges should stick to law and not engage in fiction writing from the bench. Judges Decision: Trump must not block |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 2:01:41 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
interesting ruling, not sure i buy how the 1st amendment comes into play here |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 2:02:04 PM EDT
[#37]
If the ruling says Twitter is a public forum then all social media is going to become that due to precedent?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 2:02:29 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Lol Twitter is private, it is their call if they want to allow it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 2:03:49 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If the ruling says Twitter is a public forum then all social media is going to become thta due to precedent?  Hasn't this been the big
fear that social media has been working to stifle conservative voices? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 2:05:00 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
SLIPPERY SLOPE this judge just opened up! Quote HistoryQuoted:
SLIPPERY SLOPE this judge just opened up! 
We hold that portions of the @realDonaldTrump account -- the “interactive space” where Twitter users may directly
engage with the content of the President’s tweets -- are properly analyzed under the “public forum” doctrines set forth by the Supreme Court, that such space is a designated public forum, and that the blocking of the plaintiffs based on their political speech constitutes viewpoint discrimination that violates the First Amendment. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 2:05:25 PM EDT
[#41]
Brandeis and Columbia appointed by Clinton. I'm shocked.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 2:05:37 PM EDT
[#42]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 2:06:37 PM EDT
[#43]
Didn't a guy wearing a MAGA hat just get thrown out of a bar recently and the judge ruled it was perfectly ok and not discrimination?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 2:07:34 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Glorious.
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
SLIPPERY SLOPE this judge just opened up!
We hold that portions of the @realDonaldTrump account -- the "interactive space" where Twitter users may directly
engage with the content of the President's tweets -- are properly analyzed under the "public forum" doctrines set forth by the Supreme Court, that such space is a designated public forum, and that the blocking of the plaintiffs based on their political speech constitutes viewpoint discrimination that violates the First Amendment. Peterson video in response to some feminist politicans claims) of a politician is now protected under the 1st, and therefore can't be blocked, edited or removed? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 2:10:02 PM EDT
[#45]
If he gives a speech do critics get equal time onstage?
Dopey stuff. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 2:18:10 PM EDT
[#46]
POTUS should get a private blog and to Hell with tweeter, bookface, and the rest of the nonsensical platforms.
The sooner they follow AOL and USENET into oblivion the better. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 2:20:56 PM EDT
[#47]
Sounds like a precedent to me.
Fuck you Jack. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 2:21:01 PM EDT
[#48]
Interesting.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 2:21:04 PM EDT
[#49]
@wolfwood
Alan has some experience in this.... |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2018 2:22:07 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The argument is about the last part of the 1st amendment: "and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Their argument is that blocking people on twitter violates that part. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
interesting ruling, not sure i buy how the 1st amendment comes into play here Their argument is that blocking people on twitter violates that part. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
