User Panel
Posted: 12/16/2021 2:08:34 PM EDT
Plausible?
Attached File Bloomberg piece on Blackrock (use script blocker) BlackRock I'm not sure how credible Catherine Fitts is but this is her explanation: Attached File https://goingdirect.solari.com/summary-going-direct-reset/ |
|
tl;dr: The Fed created/is creating trillions of dollars, came up with some scheme to allow Larry Fink to control and distribute, Fink puts "woke" requirements on companies to get the money.
That's a massive sum of cash and explains why there's a huge disconnect between how companies act vs what their customer base (i.e., you and me) wants. Attached File NB: No sacrifice was involved in the making of this ad. |
|
End the Federal Reserve. Imprison treasonous globalist financiers.
|
|
Quoted: End the Federal Reserve. Imprison treasonous globalist financiers. View Quote Nobody even knows about this shit. I was talking to a 60 y/o conservative Trump voter last week who hadn't even heard of George Soros. Media suppression + swiftness of action = they win. What are you going to do? |
|
@Skillshot
It's plausible. BlackRock and Bloomberg have a lot of influence in finance. |
|
Everyone thinks Soros is the devil but I don't think he's THE main guy. Fink might be one of those people in a position to do actual antichrist level stuff.
|
|
ESG is a pretty big deal. Essentially all the large Institutional investors look to companies like ISS to prepare a list of companies to invest in, and probably more importantly, to tell them how to vote in their annual meetings. Without a good ESG score, companies won't make the list, and once on the list, ISS will push for more ESG crap via proxy votes.
When companies are looking for the next boost in their stock price, they look to attract Institutional investors, and start to unravel the ESG racket. ESG is part of the plan to force companies to not be able to use the bottom line (shareholder) as an excuse and start to push for spending money on agendas that don't provide a return (stakeholder) |
|
I posted about this a couple years back in 2018 when I saw a lot of the prominent Seattle tech oligarchs leaving their respective companies to focus on their ESG work.
The truth to the post is that you have this class of ultra wealthy who made their fortunes in the market of the past 10 years. they no longer care about gains in the traditional sense, so they all turn to the flavor of the day green energy/minority run/woke businesses and just pour money into it thinking that's the legacy they want to leave for their children. FWIW it's not some secret acronym, you can watch almost any Bloomberg interview with some random CEO and come to a very similar conclusion as to what's being posted on 4chan. ESG has been the "buzzword" for a while now |
|
Quoted: Everyone thinks Soros is the devil but I don't think he's THE main guy. Fink might be one of those people in a position to do actual antichrist level stuff. View Quote Although I'm sure Soros funds woke companies, what we're talking about in this thread is institutional investment into woke companies through ESG metrics; which is more of an industry headwinds. Soros is funding radical left wing activism across the globe via NGO's, sketchy DA's in local elections, and all sorts of open borders clandestine shit. |
|
Quoted: Nobody even knows about this shit. I was talking to a 60 y/o conservative Trump voter last week who hadn't even heard of George Soros. Media suppression + swiftness of action = they win. What are you going to do? View Quote The word is getting out even outside the US. Argentine newcasts last week were talking about Soros and his buying politicians/activism. |
|
I think the most important thing we can do in this situation is ask ourselves what can we do about it?
I doubt there’s a coc answer but something tells me we’ve already lost. |
|
Sounds about right. the people and the timeline fit.
In to find out more. |
|
There are a lot of BlackRock people now working in the Biden White House
|
|
If this is true, it's far worse than I feared. This is tantamount to an overt globalist takeover of the federal reserve and US dollar. They'll crash it on purpose! I think we're in it now.
|
|
Quoted: ESG is a pretty big deal. Essentially all the large Institutional investors look to companies like ISS to prepare a list of companies to invest in, and probably more importantly, to tell them how to vote in their annual meetings. Without a good ESG score, companies won't make the list, and once on the list, ISS will push for more ESG crap via proxy votes. When companies are looking for the next boost in their stock price, they look to attract Institutional investors, and start to unravel the ESG racket. ESG is part of the plan to force companies to not be able to use the bottom line (shareholder) as an excuse and start to push for spending money on agendas that don't provide a return (stakeholder) View Quote This where I'm at. |
|
Quoted: I think the most important thing we can do in this situation is ask ourselves what can we do about it? I doubt there’s a coc answer but something tells me we’ve already lost. View Quote There are some CoC friendly options here. Build alternate businesses and help build the parallel economy. Consolidate like minded people into them as partners and employees. Detach/detangle from the woke businesses. Rome won't be built in a day but if we remain entangled we'll always be their slaves. |
|
Quoted: I think the most important thing we can do in this situation is ask ourselves what can we do about it? I doubt there’s a coc answer but something tells me we’ve already lost. View Quote Q would say either A) Storm the capital B) Wait in Dallas on the grassy knoll until JFK, Jr shows up to proclaim Trump is still president. |
|
Quoted: There are some CoC friendly options here. Build alternate businesses and help build the parallel economy. Consolidate like minded people into them as partners and employees. Detach/detangle from the woke businesses. Rome won't be built in a day but if we remain entangled we'll always be their slaves. View Quote How do you compete against Amazon? How do you compete against Google, or Meta? How do you build a parallel economy when you are competing with trillion dollar companies that own the literal tools you'd need to even enter the US marketplace. |
|
Quoted: How do you compete against Amazon? How do you compete against Google, or Meta? How do you build a parallel economy when you are competing with trillion dollar companies that own the literal tools you'd need to even enter the US marketplace. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: There are some CoC friendly options here. Build alternate businesses and help build the parallel economy. Consolidate like minded people into them as partners and employees. Detach/detangle from the woke businesses. Rome won't be built in a day but if we remain entangled we'll always be their slaves. How do you compete against Amazon? How do you compete against Google, or Meta? How do you build a parallel economy when you are competing with trillion dollar companies that own the literal tools you'd need to even enter the US marketplace. The first step is not giving money to your enemies. ESG is the ultimate extension of political nepotism. They will destroy your businesses upward mobility if you won’t actively promote their social engineering agenda. Learn from that. |
|
Quoted: How do you compete against Amazon? How do you compete against Google, or Meta? How do you build a parallel economy when you are competing with trillion dollar companies that own the literal tools you'd need to even enter the US marketplace. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: There are some CoC friendly options here. Build alternate businesses and help build the parallel economy. Consolidate like minded people into them as partners and employees. Detach/detangle from the woke businesses. Rome won't be built in a day but if we remain entangled we'll always be their slaves. How do you compete against Amazon? How do you compete against Google, or Meta? How do you build a parallel economy when you are competing with trillion dollar companies that own the literal tools you'd need to even enter the US marketplace. Not very easily, or very successfully... |
|
Quoted: End the Federal Reserve. Imprison treasonous globalist financiers. View Quote Attached File |
|
Quoted: I think the most important thing we can do in this situation is ask ourselves what can we do about it? I doubt there’s a coc answer but something tells me we’ve already lost. View Quote There’s no COC answer But it’s good those who want the return to serfdom are being named It’s a start |
|
You now realize the old-school liberals warnings about Reagan and Thatcher came true.
|
|
Quoted: If this is true, it's far worse than I feared. This is tantamount to an overt globalist takeover of the federal reserve and US dollar. They'll crash it on purpose! I think we're in it now. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Why would they crash the dollar if they control it? I'm thinking if it crashes they lose their influence. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: If this is true, it's far worse than I feared. This is tantamount to an overt globalist takeover of the federal reserve and US dollar. They'll crash it on purpose! I think we're in it now. They want more power than money can provide |
|
Quoted: Why would they crash the dollar if they control it? I'm thinking if it crashes they lose their influence. View Quote Attached File |
|
|
Quoted: The first step is not giving money to your enemies. ESG is the ultimate extension of political nepotism. They will destroy your businesses upward mobility if you won’t actively promote their social engineering agenda. Learn from that. View Quote We can talk about not giving them our money but we're just so far beyond that point of no return that it doesn't really matter anymore (hence the thread topic) EDIT: I don't disagree with anything you wrote btw! Just that traditional P&L doesn't mean anything to these trillion dollar companies |
|
This is the first I have heard his name also. He is inordinately powerful for someone unelected and no known bloodline (which shouldn’t matter in the USA)
It’s mentioned he was very involved in the “cleanup” of the October 2008 crash. The timing of which was so convenient to get their first real marxist in the White House. McCain bungled his way in the meetings, and FBHO looked like he took control in those October meetings that GW Bush convened. Overnight there were trillions of $ that just vanished in money market funds. There were congressmen who wanted an investigation into who was behind this. It wasn’t all just computer transactions. But they were warned off by leadership that they should not touch this, it’s totally radioactive. Rush was on to this for a while, even had a couple of authors on the show to discuss their book about this. Soros was always a name that would come up (plus his known minions like S Druckenmiller), but I don’t recall this name. Now I wonder - he was certainly in a position to manipulate such an event. For his own power and whatever twisted outcome he wants to see out of it. |
|
Quoted: How can you hold power without money? You need money in order to appease your subordinates that keep you in power. If that money is worthless why would those people support you? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: They want more power than money can provide Because you can turn off their ability to get food and shelter. Digital Bio ID, social credit scores, and digital currency is what the goals are. |
|
Quoted: How do you compete against Amazon? How do you compete against Google, or Meta? How do you build a parallel economy when you are competing with trillion dollar companies that own the literal tools you'd need to even enter the US marketplace. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: There are some CoC friendly options here. Build alternate businesses and help build the parallel economy. Consolidate like minded people into them as partners and employees. Detach/detangle from the woke businesses. Rome won't be built in a day but if we remain entangled we'll always be their slaves. How do you compete against Amazon? How do you compete against Google, or Meta? How do you build a parallel economy when you are competing with trillion dollar companies that own the literal tools you'd need to even enter the US marketplace. You can't compete with them head to head. Pick a small slice of the feature set that's commonly used and then build that, then get people who are at risk to cancel culture onto it. Then build more. You'll never be able to compete on price with an entrenched player. But that doesn't mean you can eat away at portions of their market share. Look what Rumble is doing to heavily entrenched YouTube. |
|
Quoted: How can you hold power without money? You need money in order to appease your subordinates that keep you in power. If that money is worthless why would those people support you? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: They want more power than money can provide They have all the money now, laws and regulations are preventing them from having the power they want. The money they have now puts them in a position to influence how the reset will work. Step one is destroy capalisim. Then they claim capalisim failed and has to be replaced. |
|
Quoted: We can talk about not giving them our money but we're just so far beyond that point of no return that it doesn't really matter anymore (hence the thread topic) View Quote That isn’t true. You choose to be dependent on them. If a few million people decided to invest in alternatives, there would be alternatives. |
|
Quoted: They have all the money now, laws and regulations are preventing them from having the power they want. The money they have now puts them in a position to influence how the reset will work. Step one is destroy capalisim. Then they claim capalisim failed and has to be replaced. View Quote This guy gets it. ^^^ They don't want communism. They want an oligarchy, and will call it equitable socialism to sell it. |
|
Quoted: There’s no COC answer But it’s good those who want the return to serfdom are being named It’s a start View Quote The problem with all of the CoC answers is that they don't give anyone anything to run towards. All CoC would do is destroy everything, leaving a vacuum for someone else to fill, and that someone else isn't likely to be a protagonist. You have to build the alternate, parallel stuff first. |
|
Quoted: How can you hold power without money? You need money in order to appease your subordinates that keep you in power. If that money is worthless why would those people support you? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: They want more power than money can provide The USSR's collapse demonstrated how. Money is a token. You pump a bubble to get more real stuff and legal rights to it. You use the property to feed, house, and employ the guards physically securing it during the instability. Then you use the influence of having all those things to be a plankowner in the new bubble and repeat. The peasants can't do anything because of private property rights. You legally pumped the bubble, you legally own the stuff, if the peasants get mad, you legally fire them to starve in your libertarian utopia until they're hungry enough to violate the NAP at which point they're legally killed. |
|
Quoted: The USSR's collapse demonstrated how. Money is a token. You pump a bubble to get more real stuff and legal rights to it. You use the property to feed, house, and employ the guards physically securing it during the instability. Then you use the influence of having all those things to be a plankowner in the new bubble and repeat. The peasants can't do anything because of private property rights. You legally pumped the bubble, you legally own the stuff, if the peasants get mad, you legally fire them to starve in your libertarian utopia until they're hungry enough to violate the NAP at which point they're legally killed. View Quote Yep. This is why you should be buying real estate, prepping, and getting some crypto. It's also why the antagonists are pushing "you'll own nothing and be happy" because once they have the rights to all the hard assets and all you have is some 1's and 0's in your brokerage and bank accounts, they have complete control. |
|
Delete of dupe.
That's two today. Something wrong with Arfcom today? Pages also loading unusually slow. |
|
Quoted: That isn’t true. You choose to be dependent on them. If a few million people decided to invest in alternatives, there would be alternatives. View Quote The whole point of ESG is that so much money comes from these institutional investors that it completely negates any traditional sound business practices or ROI. I also just don't see how we could ever feasibly get enough people involved to boycott Amazon to any meaningful degree. They are too diversified, too international, and too business critical to the US economy. |
|
|
Quoted: The whole point of ESG is that so much money comes from these institutional investors that it completely negates any traditional sound business practices or ROI. I also just don't see how we could ever feasibly get enough people involved to boycott Amazon to any meaningful degree. They are too diversified, too international, and too business critical to the US economy. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: That isn’t true. You choose to be dependent on them. If a few million people decided to invest in alternatives, there would be alternatives. The whole point of ESG is that so much money comes from these institutional investors that it completely negates any traditional sound business practices or ROI. I also just don't see how we could ever feasibly get enough people involved to boycott Amazon to any meaningful degree. They are too diversified, too international, and too business critical to the US economy. You don’t need to boycott Amazon. You just need an alternative. |
|
Quoted: The whole point of ESG is that so much money comes from these institutional investors that it completely negates any traditional sound business practices or ROI. I also just don't see how we could ever feasibly get enough people involved to boycott Amazon to any meaningful degree. They are too diversified, too international, and too business critical to the US economy. View Quote Most people don't act on principle. They act in their own self interest. And you and I can't change that. That's why we have to build alternatives, not just stamp our feet and push on the string of some temporary, short-lived boycott. Parler around 2020 showed how much of a positive impact alternates can have, and also how much of a threat the establishment views them as. |
|
I really wish the tornadoes would hit those elitist assholes instead.
|
|
Quoted: The whole point of ESG is that so much money comes from these institutional investors that it completely negates any traditional sound business practices or ROI. I also just don't see how we could ever feasibly get enough people involved to boycott Amazon to any meaningful degree. They are too diversified, too international, and too business critical to the US economy. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: That isn’t true. You choose to be dependent on them. If a few million people decided to invest in alternatives, there would be alternatives. The whole point of ESG is that so much money comes from these institutional investors that it completely negates any traditional sound business practices or ROI. I also just don't see how we could ever feasibly get enough people involved to boycott Amazon to any meaningful degree. They are too diversified, too international, and too business critical to the US economy. There's a balance. Companies aren't making money off the stock market unless they're making new issuances. They still have to keep the doors open the old fashioned way. Ultimately, executives are just being rewarded via stock comp for following the agenda. |
|
Quoted: There are some CoC friendly options here. Build alternate businesses and help build the parallel economy. Consolidate like minded people into them as partners and employees. Detach/detangle from the woke businesses. Rome won't be built in a day but if we remain entangled we'll always be their slaves. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I think the most important thing we can do in this situation is ask ourselves what can we do about it? I doubt there’s a coc answer but something tells me we’ve already lost. There are some CoC friendly options here. Build alternate businesses and help build the parallel economy. Consolidate like minded people into them as partners and employees. Detach/detangle from the woke businesses. Rome won't be built in a day but if we remain entangled we'll always be their slaves. Trade would have to be in actual goods, but even that draws the eye and ire of the gubment. I recall years ago when some locals in Cali started a large barter market. "I'll trade two laying hens for a gallon of your honey." sort of affair. They cracked down on that when it got increasingly popular. Same thing when that dude minted his own, private gold coin for currency. Sent him to prison if i remember for counterfeiting, though he was not stamping out copies of US coin. It was like the "Joe Dollar" or some such. Edit/ Did a search on the coin guy. It was called the Liberty Dollar. Looks like the busted him because his coinage resembled already minted US coinage. I guess if he had minted 24ct gold squares with Donald Duck on them, he would have been OK. Coin guy bust |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.