User Panel
[#1]
Quoted:
He clearly knows how to solve it WHEN the dimensions are available. He’s already figured out the area of the two larger areas but without the height dimension he can’t figure it out. And I think it’s fair to say we don’t expect an 8 year old to start graphing out stuff to scale. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It's missing a dimension. Have the kid draw a dimension on the center part. Call it A. Then calculate the total area by summing all the parts, 4X2 + 4X3 + 4A = 20 + 4A. And I think it’s fair to say we don’t expect an 8 year old to start graphing out stuff to scale. Seeing as there are no fractions, 1 would be assumed. (It is third grade math, they don’t try to trick you until 4th ) |
|
[#3]
Can too!
|
|
[#5]
|
|
[#8]
Quoted:
Yes, but the question is, find the area of the shape. So measure all dimensions and give the the actual correct answer. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No ruler or tape measure in the house? |
|
[#9]
|
|
[#10]
|
|
[#11]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No ruler or tape measure in the house? Draw some right triangles, do the math and you can find all missing measurements |
|
[#13]
Quoted:
Sure it does https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/3097/BC69418B-00C2-47BF-9FD9-8621B37D91E4-884878.jpg View Quote |
|
[#14]
|
|
[#15]
|
|
[#16]
I like how everyone is in here using engineering degrees to figure out what the answer “should” be when it’s third grade math.
The answer is...the teacher fucked up. |
|
[#17]
Quoted: Until it doesn't... https://www.dropbox.com/s/tgzip8adw7oby6v/4FE703A6-B81A-47D4-B622-2F934ED8C416-884852.jpg?raw=1 View Quote |
|
[#18]
Quoted:
Sure it does https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/3097/BC69418B-00C2-47BF-9FD9-8621B37D91E4-884878.jpg View Quote |
|
[#19]
Bad drawing. It would not fly at a basic engineering level. Why should a 3rd grader be tasked to solve this? This is what mid level engineers are paid to solve.
|
|
[#20]
|
|
[#21]
Quoted:
It's not to scale, so what makes you think the top right portion makes a perfect square other that assuming? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
It's not to scale, so what makes you think the top right portion makes a perfect square other that assuming? Like OP said, teacher fucked up by assigning an incomplete and poorly drawn problem. Edit: sorry, wrong quote |
|
[#22]
|
|
[#24]
Quoted:
He clearly knows how to solve it WHEN the dimensions are available. He’s already figured out the area of the two larger areas but without the height dimension he can’t figure it out. And I think it’s fair to say we don’t expect an 8 year old to start graphing out stuff to scale. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It's missing a dimension. Have the kid draw a dimension on the center part. Call it A. Then calculate the total area by summing all the parts, 4X2 + 4X3 + 4A = 20 + 4A. And I think it’s fair to say we don’t expect an 8 year old to start graphing out stuff to scale. Graphing has nothing to do with the solution. Or algebra. It's still a simple rectangular area problem we just have to fill in the blanks to get a solution so we'll add a dimension called A, instead of some number such as 7. Let's say the missing dimension is 1.7. Writing 1.7X4 is no different than writing AX4, we're simply using the language of arithmetic, albeit a part that is not familiar to 3rd graders. On the other hand, there's no reason it shouldn't be familiar. Working the problem this way, causing both of you to puzzle out the problem, is more interesting and might cause the kid to discover that he likes math and solving engineering problems. Instead of going through the simple motions after an answer he already knows. |
|
[#26]
|
|
[#28]
Quoted:
24 square inches the bottom piece is 1x4 use the length of the 3 inch side as a scale by reflecting it across the diagonal https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/3097/4FE703A6-B81A-47D4-B622-2F934ED8C416-884852.jpg View Quote |
|
[#29]
|
|
[#30]
Quoted:
He's comparing the center section to the height which are clearly different length and yet have the same dimension. Like OP said, teacher fucked up by assigning an incomplete and poorly drawn problem. Edit: sorry, wrong quote View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It's not to scale, so what makes you think the top right portion makes a perfect square other that assuming? Like OP said, teacher fucked up by assigning an incomplete and poorly drawn problem. Edit: sorry, wrong quote That leaves 1 |
|
[#31]
|
|
[#33]
Hopefully, by morning there aren't guys still trying to figure this incomplete problem out.
|
|
[#34]
|
|
[#35]
Send it back like this but in your kid's handwriting.
Area = 4(x)+20 |
|
[#36]
Quoted:
How many trips to home depot does it take to repair 1 faucet? How many nails does it take to build a dog house? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So now we are teaching 3rd graders that math is not an exact science? How many nails does it take to build a dog house? Edit: if you have correct dimensions |
|
[#37]
Quoted:
Quoted:
24 square inches the bottom piece is 1x4 use the length of the 3 inch side as a scale by reflecting it across the diagonal https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/3097/4FE703A6-B81A-47D4-B622-2F934ED8C416-884852.jpg |
|
[#41]
|
|
[#42]
I think it's missing a dimension as well, but if this is from common core, I would assume the left over middle portion is 1 x 4 and total is 24.
|
|
[#43]
|
|
[#44]
You should circle the areas where the dimension is missing and write "Problem unsolvable without missing dimension". Then print out all the responses here on GD and staple them to the paper for your child to turn in to the teacher, courtesy of yourself. Make him or her feel like a proper idiot with all the advanced mathematicians here pointing out the obvious. Cheers.
|
|
[#46]
Speaking as someone who was a surveying draftsman for years and used to drawing things from notes:
That diagram cannot be reproduced without making assumptions. You'd have to assume some kind of scale to 100 percent say what is what. There's no amount of drawing diagonals or anything else that makes that truly 100 percent able to be drawn. |
|
[#47]
Maybe that's part of the problem.
The answer is that it's not possible to answer due to missing dimension |
|
[#50]
Quoted:
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQhQfqUEsDLnid_5v-o7j5RA5LXLNyIKuQXfOCwWSRzYNP9fc2N It's missing the front sight. View Quote You score an 87. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.