User Panel
Posted: 12/12/2019 10:28:40 AM EDT
Received this with no indication of the original author.
Passing it forward. ----------------------- [Note: I received the following over the weekend. It is long, but well worth the read if you want to really understand the program there, how Navy leadership failed those who were injured and killed in this Islamic terror attack, and the real scope of who was involved. Much of this runs contrary to the official government/media narrative, which should come as no surprise to any informed person. I have added some bolding for emphasis.] From: A Veteran with 20+ years of service, a Naval Aviator who flew combat missions in Iraq, had 15+ years in counter-terrorism and served as a flight instructor at NAS Pensacola. I reported to Building 633 at Naval Air Station Pensacola in October of 2002. Checking in to flight school is a point in time for each future aviator that is never forgotten. Nobody becomes a Naval Aviator by accident. Setting foot on the quarterdeck and dropping your orders to get stamped at Naval Aviation Schools Command is the culmination of years of applications, college, physical training, aptitude screenings, FBI background checks, and performance well above your peer group who had also been competing for the coveted pilot spot . If you get there via the Naval Academy, ROTC, or Officer Candidate School, when you get to Pensacola, you have made it, but you are also just starting. Instructors and staff refer to the entirety of the training program as The Pipeline . The start of The Pipeline is the front desk at Building 633 in Pensacola. This is where the first reality check for future aviators sets in, as class and flights don't start the next day. There are only a certain number of seats for each API (Aviation Preflight Indoctrination) class, and there is a waiting list. A-Pool is where you wait (a pool of people, not of water). Building 633 is where A-Pool is administered, and where the weekly Friday morning muster takes place, and where the next weeks class up list is announced. This is where the terrorist attack took place. The Naval Aviation Training Pipeline at a glance: -A Pool. Pensacola. -Aviation Preflight Indoctrination (API), 4 weeks of academic classes and water survival courses. Pensacola. -Primary Flight Training (150ish hours in a T-6 Texan). Pensacola or Corpus [Christi] -Advanced Flight Training (Jets, Props, Helicopters). Wings are earned at completion of Advanced. Pensacola (Helicopters), Corpus (Props), Kingsville & Meridian (Jets) -Fleet Replacement Squadron. (Learning your fleet aircraft). Navy, Marine, and Coast Guard aviators all go through the same training pipeline through Advanced. It was just after 0700 last Friday when my phone starting ringing. A relative's best friend called her in a panic because her husband wasn't responding, and she wanted to know if I knew anything. Luckily, he is a doctor at the hospital at Corry Station, about 3 miles away and nowhere near the shooting and I was able to put them at ease for his safety. I had a group chat with about 20 officers still in the area. Friends and co-workers were exchanging information, all of them aviators, many still on lock down. Some of them were directly in charge of the response and involved in the investigation. All of this is available now in open media, but this is what I know. The Saudi terrorist checked in on Monday and seemed normal . He held the dinner party on Thursday night with more than 10 Royal Saudi Air Force Officers in attendance. At this party, they watched videos of mass shootings, mostly Islamic propaganda. The next morning, Friday, he systematically attacked building 633 while one of his fellow officers followed and filmed, several other Saudis waited and observed the attack from a car. The attacker started at the Quarterdeck (front desk), and the 3 killed were on duty at the time. Ensign Watson was the duty officer, was shot 5 times and still managed to call first responders and evacuate the building and personally direct them to the location of the shooter prior to dying of his wounds. The other 2 killed were also in the immediate vicinity of the quarterdeck. Many of the wounded were as well, some being wounded as they tried to climb out of windows. Per Navy policy, none had weapons to defend themselves. The first responders that confronted the shooter were from the local sheriff's department. Two were wounded in the gun battle, and the terrorist was killed. Three active duty Americans were dead, 8 more wounded, 2 deputies wounded. Many of the wounded were shot through the doors of classrooms on multiple floors of building 633. Most of the base remained on lockdown well into the afternoon as the base was systematically searched for the missing Saudi terrorists officers. By days end, 6 additional Saudi Arabian officers were in FBI custody, and several were at large in the community and a man-hunt is still underway. So, over a 5 day span, the terrorist checked in, acquired a handgun with 4 extended magazines and ammunition, posted a manifesto online condemning the US as a nation of evil along Islamist and anti-Semitic lines, planned and executed his attack with at least 3 accomplices. At least 10 Saudi Military Officers knew of the plan, and either participated or did nothing to stop it. Each one of these individuals had passed the screening process to come train in the United States. That brief recount of the chain of events begs a series of questions, some of which are easier to answer than others. Here are some of the most obvious questions, and my best effort to answer them. Was this terrorism? Absolutely. Much has been made of the lack of a formal declaration by the Military or other Federal Authority, but I understand the delay. Not only is a long term alliance involved (more on that later), but there are several members of the Royal Saudi delegation still at large within the United States. If you declare all of them terrorists, it makes the possibility of an orderly surrender virtually zero. On the off chance that these guys were at Waffle House at the time of the attack and are freaked out and hiding, it's appropriate to not label them terrorists, yet. Congressman Gaetz has appropriately called this terrorism and called for a review of entire program. Why are we training Saudis in Pensacola? While the brightest light is on the Saudis in the program, we train aviators from multiple nations in Pensacola. Germany, Sweden, and Singapore also have a large volume of students train in Pensacola. The obvious comparison to this incident is to the fact that the majority of the 9-11 hijackers trained in Florida. It is an important distinction to note that all of those individuals were civilians and had no interaction with any military training program. It is equally important to note that 10+ members of the Royal Saudi Air Force knew of a planned mass murder of American military, and either participated in it or agreed in principal to allow it to happen. Saudi Arabia is currently our strongest ally in the Middle East. We base troops there, we stage equipment there, we get our fuel for operations from there. If we are going to be involved in the Middle East, we need an ally like Saudi Arabia. We were also allies with Iran, until the Islamic Revolution there resulted in the famous hostage situation. Then were the allies with Iraq, until Saddam fired on the USS Stark (killing 37 sailors) and subsequently invaded Kuwait. So for now, we are allied with Saudi Arabia. What is it like training an international student? Each nation is different, and it was interesting to see some stereotypes play out and interact with different cultures. The Swedish and Norwegians were your typical vikings. The Germans were often humorless, focused, and smart. The Singaporeans were incredibly disciplined, and this group of students policed itself in an impressive manner. Any Sing who did poorly on a flight or test would have the other students ensure they did well the next time around. I’d gladly fight alongside any of these guys any day of the week. I stay in touch with several of my students as their careers advance. The Saudi students have an entirely different reputation and structure to their training. While all of the other nations employ a form of meritocracy to be in the flight program, the Saudi students are typically the child of a Saudi sheik, politician, or member of a rich/important Saudi family. They all drive luxury vehicles, and flaunt their wealth to the other students and instructors. It isn't unusual to see a Saudi student wearing designer shoes that cost thousands of dollars with their uniforms instead of their issued shoes or boots. The Saudis do not stand any of the squadron watches (Like assistant OOD (Officer of the Deck), where the flight schedule is executed), while other nations participate fully in squadron functions. The Saudis also have a cadre of senior officers in Pensacola, ostensibly to monitor and aid the progress of the students. They employ a number of former/retired (US) Navy pilots to serve as tutors to the Saudis, and also to provide instruction on how to properly interact with their US instructors and inside of American society. The retired officers also act as a liaison to the American command structure. Our instructors are told that we can only instruct the Saudis in flying. Issues regarding disciple, respect, or military bearing, etc all have to be referred to the liaisons. Those issues are rampant among the Saudi contingent, and are well known among the chain of command. While there are certainly some Saudi students who have been respectful and disciplined, the norm is an aloof, arrogant child who seemingly feels superior to his instructor. American and non-Saudi international students are expected to show up to the pre-flight briefs ready to explain all of the concepts required in the flight to the instructor (proof they study and paid attention in class). Saudi students often show up to briefs unprepared to meet that standard, and expect the material to be presented to them anew. The norm for the Saudis is to pass the student regardless of performance, unless they are simply a danger to themselves, then they get referred back through the liaisons. We are paid to move them through the pipeline and deliver them having completed the syllabus. We can't make them study. One friend had a Saudi student refuse to recover an aircraft from a spin, and simply threw up his hands and stated If Allah wills it, it will recover. This was during out-of-control flight, with the aircraft falling several thousand feet per minute. The instructor took the controls, recovered from the spin, and returned to base. That student eventually graduated. I have had conversations over the last 3 days with at least a dozen current or former Navy flight instructors. Unanimously, the sentiment is that Saudis should be expelled from training in our program. Not only is there legitimate concern for personal safety and national security, there is a general feeling that they won't be able to put their feeling aside and provide proper training. Why did the Sheriff Department have to stop the shooting and not active duty watch-standers or military police? In short, because the Sailors at NAS Pensacola were failed by their leadership. After the Naval Reserve Center in Chattanooga was attacked by a Muslim terrorist, then Candidate Trump was critical of the policy of military members being disarmed while on duty. The only reason that the Chattanooga body count wasn't higher, was because the Navy Commanding Officer (an aviator) had disregarded policy and had his personal handgun with him in his office and he confronted the attacker and returned fire. He would later say that he disregarded policy because the safety of his command was his ultimate responsibility. He defended his command that day, and saved lives. The next iteration of the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) included provisions to allow commanders the discretion to allow CHL holders to bring their personal weapons onto base to defend themselves in similar instances. Tragically, no US commander has had the guts to implement the allowances granted by law. We didn't learn our lessons with the Fort Hood shooting, The Navy Yard Shooting, The Chattanooga shooting, so now we have this. Will we finally recognize the threat and allow those who have sworn to defend the constitution of the United States the ability to defend themselves while at work on US soil? I doubt it. Sadly, I think it will take an action similar to what President Trump took with Chief Gallagher to make stubborn and stupid Navy leadership do what is the obvious and correct course of action. Should we have seen this coming? Absolutely. When I told my father (a retired Naval Aviator) that a foreign student was responsible, he responded I'll bet it was a Saudi. A brother is a veteran Naval Flight Officer who trained in Pensacola. His response, It's probably a Saudi. My neighbor from Pensacola who now flies for an airline Mother F***, you know it was a Saudi!†For some reason, there is a political push to excuse these attacks as one-off, or that the perpetrator was radical . The news is already saying There is no direct link to a terrorist organization, as if ISIS gives out membership IDs and T-Shirts. The Politically Correct folks tell us to not judge an entire religion or culture by the actions of a single individual. The Factually Correct among us look at this chain of events and see no coincidences. The fact that such a large portion of the Saudi contingent knew of the impending attack and chose to participate, and none chose to stop it show the truth that many have long known but few in leadership will acknowledge. The actions taken by this Royal Saudi Officer were not at all extremist . His views and actions were well in line with the mainstream Saudi Officer in the unit. Defenders of Islam will say that it is a Religion of Peace and only extremists join the terror groups. With sad irony, many critics of Islamic terrorism have observed the rise of ISIS with their pool of men and resources flowing largely from Sunni Saudi Arabia have said said that it's the extremist Muslim who is actually fighting, but the peaceful Muslim is the majority.they just write the checks. The example in Pensacola shows us that it's the minority extremist shooting his classmates, it's the peaceful Muslim standing alongside filming. Students of history will know that these terror attacks are not random nor motivated by extreme thinking. It is an American tendency to think that history started in 1776, or maybe 1492 at the earliest. Our schools teach world history and battles that took place in Europe as being between empires like the Romans and Ottomans . They leave the parts out where it was the HOLY Roman Empire that defeated the ISLAMIC Caliphate in Vienna, September 11th 1683. This military defeat and it's date is etched into the cultural identity of every Muslim just like the Alamo and San Jacinto are taught to kids in Texas. The only difference is that Texas school children don't have a religious document telling them that the conquest continues and it is their life-long Jihad to install islam as the law of the entire world. The events in Pensacola last Friday are minuscule in the scope of world history. It is, however, a perfect illustration of the war of cultures (and yes, religions) that we currently find ourselves in as participants. While the Politically Correct in Washington will likely downplay the details and work to wipe the event from the headlines to preserve an alliance, the Factually Correct among us are still walking the streets with Saudi terrorists at large. Those in our military will follow the orders they gave their oaths to follow, though we strongly disagree with them. We will likely continue to risk our lives and work to train people that hate us, and would kill us if given the opportunity. The King of Saudi Arabia can say that the actions don't reflect those in his Kingdom. The facts make him a liar. Where do we go from here? 1. Immediately allow all Commissioned Officers and senior NCOs (E-7+) who are qualified (military or CHL) to carry a military equivalent or issued weapon while on duty. 2. All Saudi personnel in the US should be restricted to base, and have their quarters searched for weapons. If they had no knowledge, they should be expelled. If they did have knowledge or participated, they should be executed. 3. Suspend training Saudi personnel indefinitely. Only resume the program when the FBI can conduct background checks for each student and officer. Once screened and admitted, Saudi students should be restricted to base and not allowed into the community. 4. Evaluate the alliance between the US and Saudi Arabia beyond the fact that they are a client nation buying billions of dollars in weapons and training. Is our strategic relationship with the Saudi government worth the cost inflicted on us by a Saudi population which clearly hates us and continues to do us harm. Do the officers that we train for combat ever actually participate in conflict in a meaningful way that supports US interests or relieve demand on US forces. If not, disband the program forever. 5. Be better students of history. Value reality above wishful thinking. Judge cultures and religions by what they do, rather than what they want you to think. Take political blinders off and build and execute policy based on reality rather than wishful thinking. That is all. |
|
Post 9/11, why are we hosting Saudi Pilots, or any Saudi military personnel period? I'm guessing $$$$ and oil?
How many foreign nationals receiving military training have "disappeared" while over here in the last 20 years? |
|
He's spot-on in every point except for limiting on-base carry to officers and senior NCO's only.
|
|
Quoted:
Post 9/11, why are we hosting Saudi Pilots, or any Saudi military personnel period? I'm guessing $$$$ and oil? How many foreign nationals receiving military training have "disappeared" while over here in the last 20 years? View Quote We had some Saudis ass rape an American rotary wing student a few years back. When they weren't handing out expensive ink pens and other gifts, driving around in a Ferrari or skipping class for a week to tour the country. Failing them is never an option, a Prince doesn't fail. |
|
|
A long read but worth it. I learned a lot and agree with the conclusions.
|
|
|
A small part of that excellent read brought up a point that needs to be emphasized: Has a Saudi pilot ever engaged in a meaningful way in the defense of their country or the coalition of "friendly nations".
Bottom line: If they are not going back home and standing station in defense of their homeland, the whole program needs to be scuttled. |
|
Quoted:
A small part of that excellent read brought up a point that needs to be emphasized: Has a Saudi pilot ever engaged in a meaningful way in the defense of their country or the coalition of "friendly nations". Bottom line: If they are not going back home and standing station in defense of their homeland, the whole program needs to be scuttled. View Quote |
|
Supposedly the sum they pay the Navy for this is insane.
If this is to continue, the price should go up as well. By a factor of about ten, along with the suggestion of keeping them under lock and key for every single minute they are here. |
|
I'm sure the argument would be regarding Saudi military training in CONUS (and military sales in general) is that if we do not do it, the Russians surely will.
|
|
Stop training them here, period! What stops the next one from stealing a jet and making a suicide run into a large metro area?
On a side note, I would be more concerned with the ones that are disciplined and paying attention. The obnoxious ones throwing their money around and partying are probably not the ones thinking about making a suicide run. They are the ones that make sure the family of the attacker is well taken care of. |
|
Quite interesting
It is posts like this that make GD worth checking out |
|
That's an act of war not terrorism. Have the Saudis rounded up and executed their family's yet? If not fuck em we don't need allies there anymore.
|
|
The whole thing has the ring of truth to it, and is quite accurate to my experience.
If you’re on a watch in any branch of service, you should be armed. And Saudis do not belong in our training, period. Plenty of other ME nations have good troops, we should toss them out for this. Actions have consequences. Executing Saudis is a little much but I understand the point he’s making. 9.5/10 |
|
Quoted:
Supposedly the sum they pay the Navy for this is insane. If this is to continue, the price should go up as well. By a factor of about ten, along with the suggestion of keeping them under lock and key for every single minute they are here. View Quote |
|
Hes not wrong
Bases should allow chl and we shouldn't be training saudis here when we have a base in the kingdom |
|
All complete and total common sense.
It is illogical that military personnel should be restricted from carrying weapons, at least in many situations. It is government politics and general incompetence at the root of many of these scenarios. There should be accountability for bad decision making and people should be fired. |
|
Jesus, reading that really pissed me off. And most of those dirty goat fuckers will simply be sent home...
|
|
Quoted:
That's an act of war not terrorism. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Who gives a shit what they do? Threaten them. With friends like that who needs enemies? The kingdom is a huge sponsor of terrorism. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
A small part of that excellent read brought up a point that needs to be emphasized: Has a Saudi pilot ever engaged in a meaningful way in the defense of their country or the coalition of "friendly nations". Bottom line: If they are not going back home and standing station in defense of their homeland, the whole program needs to be scuttled. |
|
Quoted: Yep, if you are standing watch, you should be armed. View Quote We pay for armed security instead, because they're not burdened by our weapons policies. CHL/CCW could work, but now you're at the mercy of state laws. The majority of military personnel are overseas or in blue states (probably 60% of the Navy is in California and Hawaii), and even if they're not, you're still under federal pressure that makes it difficult to get a handgun unless you're 21 (which, a good portion of the military is not). And that's only just scratching the surface of all the hurdles. It's much easier to do nothing, which is what we're likely to do. BUT, if I were to propose a compromise, the simplest and fastest thing to do is to simply bring back officers' sidearms. Back in the day, a handgun (and before it, a sword), had both a practical and decorative function. It was a mark of status/authority, a component of the uniform, and also, of course, a practical weapon. A relatively easy thing would be to simply make it part of the uniform again. You'd need some standards to be written, of course. Say, it has to be capable of firing the current service ammo, you need a holster of a certain quality and construction, only certain belts and other equipment are acceptable, and so on. And it would make sense that you'd need to qualify with your actual handgun, if not take a specific training course. The list goes on. this is only "relatively easy," in actuality it would still be a nightmare of bureaucracy. But by tying it to the uniform, you solve a number of problems. Who buys it, how it's worn, when you're allowed to wear it, etc. Much easier than linking it to watchstanding status or anything job-related. |
|
Quoted: The logistics of that is simply untenable. You can't do it with military weapons. Those need to be in a logbook, stored in an armory, chain of custody, etc, etc. Every watchstander in a building separate from the armory, or out in town (eg NOSC Chattanooga), and so forth, they're going to need to draw weapons, then travel, there and back again... the time suck alone will be huge, and that's even if you can get enough weapons out to enough armories. We pay for armed security instead, because they're not burdened by our weapons policies. CHL/CCW could work, but now you're at the mercy of state laws. The majority of military personnel are overseas or in blue states (probably 60% of the Navy is in California and Hawaii), and even if they're not, you're still under federal pressure that makes it difficult to get a handgun unless you're 21 (which, a good portion of the military is not). And that's only just scratching the surface of all the hurdles. It's much easier to do nothing, which is what we're likely to do. BUT, if I were to propose a compromise, the simplest and fastest thing to do is to simply bring back officers' sidearms. Back in the day, a handgun (and before it, a sword), had both a practical and decorative function. It was a mark of status/authority, a component of the uniform, and also, of course, a practical weapon. A relatively easy thing would be to simply make it part of the uniform again. You'd need some standards to be written, of course. Say, it has to be capable of firing the current service ammo, you need a holster of a certain quality and construction, only certain belts and other equipment are acceptable, and so on. And it would make sense that you'd need to qualify with your actual handgun, if not take a specific training course. The list goes on. this is only "relatively easy," in actuality it would still be a nightmare of bureaucracy. But by tying it to the uniform, you solve a number of problems. Who buys it, how it's worn, when you're allowed to wear it, etc. Much easier than linking it to watchstanding status or anything job-related. View Quote Selling the idea could include the notion that for command, it opens up a huge array of possibilities for exacting harsh discipline on them. They will love that part of it. New ways to fuck with people are always welcome by an O-6 and up. |
|
Also, and I hate to be a Debbie Downer on this one, but if you want to arm military personnel on the regular, you've got to actually solve the suicide problem first.
I don't mean have a bunch of "training" and talk circles around the problem while never actually doing anything. I mean actually look at the causes of depression and suicide and make service-wide changes to how we treat our people. Also, when it comes to "that guy," you've got to start actually kicking them out instead of just letting them lounge around thinking up new and inventive ways to fuck shit up. You know what I'm talking about. The Private Mannings of the world. Probably change a few other things, too, while we're at it... |
|
|
|
Quoted:
While agree with everyone that the issues of personnel protection and foreign visitor vetting are serious, I fear your point is being lost. This was clearly planned far in advance. Saudi military logistics were utilized to coordinate that planning, placing the right people in the right place at the right time, and the attack was supported by multiple on-scene parties. With or without the knowledge/influence of the royal/ruling caste is irrelevant. This is fucking serious. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
That's an act of war not terrorism. |
|
Everything he stated regarding the Saudi attitude is correct and spot on.
|
|
Quoted:
So, over a 5 day span, the terrorist checked in, acquired a handgun with 4 extended magazines and ammunition, posted a manifesto online condemning the US as a nation of evil along Islamist and anti-Semitic lines, planned and executed his attack with at least 3 accomplices. At least 10 Saudi Military Officers knew of the plan, and either participated or did nothing to stop it. Each one of these individuals had passed the screening process to come train in the United States. That brief recount of th chain of events begs a series of questions, some of which are easier to answer than others. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Great read. How do we get the President to read this? View Quote Maintaining the monarchy is more important to US policy than the servicemen lost. You can be angry at this truth but it is not going to change as the only thing that can replace it is far worse. There may be a pause and the Saudis will claim there will be additional screening measures but I cannot see the US no longer accepting Saudis for training. |
|
Quoted: The terrorist had been in the US since 2017...curious as to when he acquired the firearm. Andddd, possibly embraced radical idealogy years prior based on social media accounts that apparently weren't discovered. View Quote This guy didn't believe or do one single thing that wasn't commanded of him in recognized doctrine according to the koran, surah, and hadiths. What I have a hard time reconciling, is that one of the victims has an obviously muslim name. I acknowledge it doesn't mean that's what he was. |
|
I have one issue and that is the fact that he didn't mention the two Enlisted students who were killed.
|
|
|
I'm very aware of that, as stated one of the victims here was a US Airman from St. Petersburg FL :
Airman Mohammed Hathaim, student, Naval Aviation Schools Command, 19, from St. Petersburg, Florida I'd expect that someone with the shooter's motivations would not deliberately target another muslim. It's just not typical. RIP to the three lives lost. |
|
Quoted:
The whole thing has the ring of truth to it, and is quite accurate to my experience. If you’re on a watch in any branch of service, you should be armed. And Saudis do not belong in our training, period. Plenty of other ME nations have good troops, we should toss them out for this. Actions have consequences. Executing Saudis is a little much but I understand the point he’s making. 9.5/10 View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I'm very aware of that, as stated one of the victims here was a US Airman from St. Petersburg FL. I'd expect that someone with the shooter's motivations would not deliberately another muslim. It's just not typical. View Quote They kill each other all the time. Allah will sort 'em out. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.