User Panel
If slavery were legal and affordable, then yes, I would own a slave. I'd also treat any slave I owned like a fucking human being instead of property or cheap labor. It'd be more of a social contract, like an indentured servant (which are still legal, incidentally) than actual slavery though.
"You're a slave and I might buy you, but I'm going to treat you like person. Here's the deal: you keep the place clean, make the lawn look nice, etc. and I'll provide for you and give you the same quality of life as me. If you can eventually be freed legally, then that's what I'll do for you, regardless of whether you're helpful or an insolent asshole. I'll protect you and make you as free as you can be under the system. Deal?" Any slave I owned would probably be female as well. Less inclined to be rebellious (especially since they're getting a better deal than they would otherwise, living as a slave) and frankly the concept of a male slave getting Stockholm Syndrome would creep me out. Long story short, I would own slaves for the sole purpose of freeing them (if possible) or at least giving the opportunity to have a real life as a real human being. No one in my family ever owned slaves, but a friend of the family did prior to the Civil War. He gave his slaves a social contract like the one I stated; they worked for him willingly because he treated them like people. When slavery was abolished, they all stayed at his farm and kept working there. They weren't his slaves; they were his adopted family. |
|
At first I thought you were som efreedom hating troll..but you have apoint here, but how much fun will it be to watch Kerry and Kennedy fight to the death? I mean really Unless Kerry wears pantyhose or Teddy a loincloth? MMM now Hillary might put up a better fight....OH MY G*D her and fienswine in a cat fight, that would be disgusting! |
|
|
I see posts talk about the moral aspect of slavery. Please tell me in the Bible where it states slavery is IMmoral? Jesus said if you are a slave that you must be held to the same standrads as anyone else, not that it was wrong.
I'm not taking the Pro-slavery side. Just asking. Personally I wouldn't own a slave. |
|
Planning a trip to where the Lone Ranger takes his trash? (To the dump to the dump to the dump, dump dump.) |
|
|
Good luck getting liberal to do any amount of decent work! |
|
|
for all of you who seriously said yes, because it would be ok if you treated them right, you are lousy pieces of shit. I mean that with the utmost contempt.
|
|
Please dont make judgements with these guys. Most are having fun and posting stuff for entertainment. Besides I really doubt any of these guys would have a slave unless she had some serious boobies. |
|
|
How much are really cute ones?
While sex slaves would definitely be appealing I'd probably just end up with 5 or 6 girlfriends who I technically owned. I don't feel the need to be dominant over others (especially females) unless we are role playing. |
|
Maybe.......But I tell you one thing I wouldn't mind being a slave to the women on this sight.
But then they would just have me do the wrong type of grunt work. |
|
Nope. I would worry about them killing me to get their freedom.
Plus I would rather buy guns than human beings. |
|
|
|
|
eta PWN3D! |
||
|
I :::checks over shoulders::: do own one, my lovely wife! |
|
|
Eh, why not? I truly thing, that living in a society such as early America, I would have offered any potential slaves a "social contract" like that above. Hell, I treat my cats like people, can you IMAGINE what I'd do to actual people? They'd eat better than me!
|
|
Um... You might try rereading that (just what you wrote, even) and then telling me what's wrong with it.
I prefer more expensive hired labor to slaves; they're more reliable workers. Of course, few would be stupid enough to put their lives at risk on behalf of mine since you have to be alive to spend your paycheck. That's why I'll have male slaves raised from birth and heavily indoctrinated/brainwashed into being loyal bodyguards from cradle to grave, with no purpose but to ensure that I have the same amount of blood in my body at the end of the day that I started out with. Janissaries were a very well thought out concept and I see little reason why such a program would not work today. The harem, of course, presents problems. Again, it's best if you get them while they're young so there's plenty of time to warp their little minds into perfect, obedient concubines, but that takes forever before you can enjoy the fruits of your labor. No, if you want concubines who can get to work on the first day on the job, you'll have to buy them from a reputable slaver and these days it's so hard to tell whether or not the goods have been spoiled prior to your purchasing them. Fortunately, concubines are like any other women: petty, jealous, and vindictive. Just play them off of each other so they're constantly fighting for your approval (maybe swap out your favorite pet every couple weeks or so) and they'll be far too busy to even think of treachery or running away. Now, of course, you've opted for a more traditional plantation-style enslavement. Automation would be cheaper in the long run than slave labor, but frankly it doesn't hold the same sort of satisfaction at the end of the day. You might consider spending a small investment on narcotics or alcohol to keep your slaves docile- keep them addicted or too drugged out to rebel, then have them pass out in a stupor in the evening. It worked for the Egyptians. |
|||
|
Assuming you needed to pay for food, shelter, and health, and completely ignoring the moral aspects (this IS ARFCOM) I'm not sure it would make economic sense to own a slave. The only thing you could use them for would be menial labor requiring zero initiative, and even then they'd have to be supervised by Mr. LeGree, you slave driver. Maybe you could make it work for stoop labor on the farm, but I doubt it, since that's seasonal. Perhaps you could make it work by renting out your slaves for odd jobs when you're not using them. Maybe household servants, but a lot of that work has been automated or can be outsourced to maid companies. Or maybe the minimum wage companies would be replaced by companies using slave labor. Say, a major hotel replaces its housekeeping staff with in-house slaves.
Slaves would only be useful for the narrow range between the costs of slave upkeep and minimum wage. They'd probably be less productive than the minimum wage jockies even then. Unless Mr. LeGree was particularly good with the whip. It's hard to say, because much of the really low-productivity labor has been wiped out by minimum wage laws. |
|
yes, 5'11" Built like Elle McPhereson, brunette.. Oh wait, nevermind..
|
|
|
|
The problem comes when they want to sit in your lap to be petted. So make sure you only get female slaves. |
|
|
On a long enough timeline slavery doesnt work, but then there is marriage, which does work as long as you pay the light bill. Small price for cooking, cleaning, sex and a vessel for your offspring
|
|
Well, I sure could use the reliable help that a slave would provide but, if I had one I would let him know that he can leave anytime he wants and I would treat him as I would a friend/(loved) family member. If he wants to come back at any time, the 'job' is still here.
If it was a female slave.... It would likely be a beauty and the beast type of relationship, where I demand this and that, here and now but, as I become attached to her I feel guilt and allow her to leave if she wishes. |
|
The kind that wait for you to roll off them in a drunken stupor and then slit your throat while you sleep??? |
|
|
Yet another good reason to tie them to the headboard... |
|
|
I think were I to have one, mine would closely resemble SP1Grrl in a maid's outfit.
|
|
damn right. I'm married so, yea, I'd like to see the tables turned for once
|
|
Just make sure there's a little slack in the rope/chains. You don't want their head smacking against the headboard all night and give them a concussion or bloody their hair. That shit's expensive to take care of. |
||
|
You two are sick and twisted. I like those qualities in a person. |
|||
|
You're female, right? If yes, you interested in meeting for dinner and a hotel room? I'll bring the handcuffs. *goes straight to hell when he dies* |
||||
|
I would own hundreds. I would pontificate to them on a regular basis on the evils of slavery. I would arm them and then free them. I would then lead them on a holy crusade across the country to free all the slaves that all of you have. I would become a great historical figure. I would be worshipped. People would hang pictures of me in their living rooms. I would have my own national holiday.
|
|
I would own one and teach them to post on ARFCOM all day so I wouldn't have to read stupid threads about people who had a bad experience with service at Denny's. Then we could discuss the day's poll results and which caliber is better for zombies over a beer together at the end of the day.
|
|
*makes a note on his list of potentially dangerous people to eliminate before they spread their ideas* One John Brown was more than enough. |
|
|
until my band of holy warriors reached your little utopia and took your ARFCOM poster slave aside. After learning to sing kumbaya and being dazzled by my charisma he would turn on you like a malnourished pom and commence to take out his frustrations over your years of explotation. |
|
|
You've already been tarred, feathered, and burned at the stake. Most of your slaves have either been shipped to high security facilities to prevent the risk of further contamination; the ones deemed caught early enough to fix will receive intense indoctrination before being placed back on the market. So hush, you. |
||
|
Just finished "Day before midnight" so John Brown has been stuck in my head. I was reveling in the fact that I found a thread to reference him in. killjoy |
|||
|
Owning a human as a slave is completely wrong...
but with the genetics going the way that they are we may have non humans (chimera) as slaves in the future, but they would most likely be going to the "rich" people who can afford them. With having a slave you would have to have them conditioned so that they won't attack you when/if you make them angry. So in the future we may have organic creatures that will be doing our housework but then we may bypass all that and just have androids/robots/cyborgs doing our odds and end jobs. Me personally I would probably have a cyborg one who would repair and upgrade my vehicles, matain my armorments, matain my home and know how to cook. Also I would treat said 'slave' with respect. So in short, human slave no. Chimera slave, specifically designed/bred for said work then maybe. |
|
Kansas will thank me. |
||||
|
sarcasm.... guess it didn't come off well, did it? |
||
|
<looks down blouse> Holy SHIT!!! I'm a GIRL!!!!! <---Is going even straighter to hell because of that bitch Eve and her shenanigans..... |
|
|
w00t |
||
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.