User Panel
Yes, 2 3/4 slug. Prolly 75 yards. I did some testing on a 6" thick board at about 6 feet using Federal Tactical slugs and wasn't that impressed with the "almight 12 gauge". |
|
|
see, you guys are putting way to many stipulations on this scenario. making it real hard for me to post a smart ass answer.
|
|
You couldn't be more right. Just this last fall I shot two ~200lb doe with 130grain .270. One as close as 50 yards, the other at about 175yards. Both of them ran 50 yards before they dropped and both of them had a nice small hole right behind the front leg and right out the other side. After gutting them both had their hearts split right in half by the round. Granted, a .270 isn't a 30-06 or a .300 win mag, but it does tell you that just because a round hits a deer and might destroy the heart doesn't mean that they will fly back or crumple on the spot. Ask anyone who lives around grizzlys if they'd shoot for the heart to try to stop one attacking them. If you want to drop an animal or a person as fast as possible the best way to do that is to shoot at the nervous system, not the circulatory system. |
|
|
The likely reason-- I am a bow hunter too, and I do my own butchering (have a commercial grinder, etc.), and I shoot all my deer (if possible) by hitting them behind the front shoulder, in the rib cage, same as with an arrow. Each front shoulder has about five pounds of burger meat in it, so I do not want to waste them. Not to sound like a know-it-all, but I've shot enough deer that I'm beyond the "I just want to knock him down" phase (as you likely are also, if you've analyzed things to this extent ), and am thinking beyond just getting him killed. Once I started to bow hunt, I noticed the rib cage shot deer are SO much nicer to butcher, so I adopted that method for hunting with firearms too. If the deer's attention is fixed on something I prefer to head shoot them, for obvious reasons, rarely take a front-on shot (any projectile travelling full-length makes a nasty mess in the guts), and usually wait for a nice "double lung" broadside shot. The .30-06 does a good job, now that I've switched to Sierra soft point bullets. I was using Winchester Fail Safe Talons (Black Talons for rifles) and they were the same as using fmj when hitting the rib cage--they SUCKED, and the last buck I shot went 500+ yards, after a perfect "bow shot" through both lungs, and was very nearly the first deer I shot and didn't recover. I've had no problem since switching to soft points. Sorry for the hijack, as little of this is relevant to the thread. |
||
|
i've only taken one deer with a slug, and it went down quickly, probably stumbled around for about 20 yards and dropped. all other's i've taken with 7 mm mags and .270s, and they run off like carl lewis on meth. but like someone else said, every shooting is like a snowflake
|
|
A rifled slug shot through a smooth bore barrel does not have spin imparted to it. The "rifled" part--actually just ridges at an angle (Foster and Brenneke slugs)--is there to allow it to pass through the choke contained in most barrels. The slug maintains its nose-on flight characteristic by being heavier in front, like a badminton birdie. A rifled barrel on a shotgun, shooting saboted slugs, is, by definition, a "rifle"--but not by legal description, in most states. It was likely a typo in the vest mfr.'s description. |
||
|
"Listen! And understand! That Slug is out there. It can't be bargained with! It can't be reasoned with! It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead!" "You still don't get it, do you? The Slug will find her. That's what he does. That's all he does! You can't stop him! He'll wade through you, reach down her throat, and pull her fucking heart out!" |
|
|
Hell, you couldn't even spell 'dying' right before. And you discount what other people with actual working knowledge have to say because of they transposed two letters. Really, you should learn about the subject matter before you post baseless opinions that fly in the face of established fact. You're just making yourself look foolish. |
|
|
12 gauge slug: The magic round. Will kill anyone at any range, no matter how much armor they're wearing. Hell, they could be in a tank and the slug would go through the tank, defeat the armor plate, the vest, and then go through the person, out the other side of the vest, though the other side of the tank, and then find the engine block of an oldsmobile 442 and go straight through it like butter! Screw it, I'm selling every gun I own and buying only 12 gauge shotguns from now. Nothing can stop it. |
||
|
Yeah, just like when you SHOOT a shotgun.. Come on folks. Simple physics here. Is the trauma to your shoulder when firing a 12ga unbearable? Imagine that same force spread out over a MUCH LARGER area... Scott |
|
|
Really Bastiat, I think you're giving that tank, body armor, and olds 442 WAY too much credit! This is a 12 gauge slug we're talking about here, not a bb gun. I would think there'd be at least a mushroom cloud. |
|||
|
I am no expert, but I doubt the recoil force is the same as the muzzle force. If it was then no round would ever kill anything. |
|
|
correct |
||
|
Wow, you really are "no expert"--not even a novice. "For every action there is an equal, and opposite, reaction." Period--EVERY action, including shooting a projectile from a firearm. You live by this law whether you are aware of it or not. |
||
|
If I drop a bowling ball from 6 feet will it penetrate your skin ? If I drop a broad head arrow from the same distance will it penetrate your skin. |
||
|
I came out to 80877 ft/lb from here : http://www.eatel.net/~amptech/elecdisc/kineticenergy.swf 2000 lbs = 14,000,000 grains Remington gives 2,361 ft/lb of energy for a 12ga 1oz slug So getting hit by a VW going 35 MPH delivers 34x more energy then a 12ga slug. In order for it to deliver the same amount of energy the VW would have to be going .... 8.5 fps or 5.8 MPH |
|
|
I shot a 12 gauge 3 inch slug through a used level II vest from about 10 yards.
It went through the first side with no problems. |
|
Shows what you know. The facts have already been put out there. You choose to believe hollywood and the rumor-mill instead. |
|
|
Yes, I understand that Mike. But some of the recoil is absorbed various ways thru out the gun is it not? Where as all of the energy is released in the bullet. SGtar15 |
|||
|
You DO (mostly) understand it. You are exactly correct (except the part about "all of the energy is released in the bullet"--it's ALL released into the firearm too)--the energy required to overcome the inertia of a several pound firearm versus moving a MUCH lighter projectile uses up much of the energy involved. Also, as in the bowling ball and hunting arrow analogy above, the surface area/shape factors heavily also. The bottom line is that exactly the same kinetic energy is exerted both forward and backward--it just has different things to act upon in each direction, hence the ability to be effective on both ends. I am certainly no whiz at physics, but do understand the basics. |
|
|
I own a video tape that shows people getting killed.
One of these is of a Korean student in a riot. The cop/soldier shoots him point blank in the chest with a 12 gauge. He just stands there. Blood starts pouring out of the hole - pause for several seconds - He collapses from the blood loss. So, there we have a real life (and death) example of the mighty, nuclear 12 gauge. Didn't even really move the guy at all, and it took about 20 seconds to incapacitate him. |
|
(1) Two objects interacting feel the same (magnitude of) force in different directions. The gun and the slug feel the same force (transmitted through the expanding gas). Force is change in momentum per unit time. Since both the gun and the slug interact for the same period of time, they both gain the same momentum. Momentum is mass*speed. The gun, weighing hundreds of times more than the slug, is moving hundreds of times slower than the bullet (less than 10 fps). The vastly different speeds mean that the bullet has hundreds of times more energy (0.5*mass*speed*speed) than the gun. That's a big factor in the deadliness of the bullet. (2) Now...a little more about forces. What does "muzzle force" mean? Forces are relevant at two points, the firing of the gun and the impact with the person. The forces on the gun and slug at firing are certainly equal (assuming that the muzzle blast doesn't have a significant effect one way or the other). What are the forces on the shooter and the shootee? As stated above, force is the change in momentum per unit time. When the gun recoils against you, it is moving very slowly. Because it is moving slowly, your body (which has a lot of inertia) has time to move with it. That means that the momentum transfer is spread over a relatively long time, compared to the slug hitting the shootee. The slug is moving so fast that the shootee's inertia holds them in place, and they do not have time to react to the shot. Remember, both the gun and the slug are transferring about the same amount of momentum to the shooter/shootee. Since the time of transfer is so much shorter for the slug/shootee, the force is much greater. This emphasizes the point that forces are only conserved in interactions. The thing that's conserved for freely moving objects is momentum. What determines the force that that moving object exerts on another object during a second interaction is the time it takes to transfer the momentum. (3) Cyanide's post above raises another important point. Pressure (force/area) is very important, too. Not only is the force of the slug on the shooter much greater, the area is much smaller. Pressure translates roughly into penetration. Edited 'cause I kant kount 2 thre. |
||||
|
What the hell is this... the part in Monty Python's Holy Grail where they are arguing about whether or not the coconut got carried by the swallow? Funny stuff...
Anyways... all of you who have discounted the mighty 12 gauge slug might do well to remember that it is still one of the main weapons in hand when an Alaskan guide or park ranger needs to deal with an angry Brown bear. There are many reasons for that, but one of the main ones is that IT IS POWERFUL enough to do the job. Which would you rather have if faced at close range with a large Griz or Brown... a 7.62 or a 12 gauge with 1oz slugs? I'm sure some of you smartasses will prefer the rifle caliber, but I would have to go with the caliber chosen by those with experience in the field. Tell me how many of the Alaskan guides and rangers are using 7.62 as their bear defensive caliber... |
|
I don't know, are the bears wearing level III plates? |
|
|
This one time, at band camp . . . |
||
|
there was a cop that I read about who was shot with a 45-70. His vest stopped the bullet from penetrating, but he died anyway from the blunt trauma to the chest. His wife was trying to sue the company that made the vest.I dont have a link but somebody else might.
I believe that if you got shot in the chest with a 12guage slug, without trauma plates you might die you might not, probably has to do with specific areas and organs, and how fast you might get medical treatment. Heck I have heard of batters getting hit with a baseball in the chest and dying. |
|
Is that an African or European shotgun? |
|
|
i've seen this footage and you're exactly right. isn't it kind of ruthless how the copper just stands over him and racks the slide, basically ejecting the empty shell right on him while he bleeds to death (didn't take long by the looks of it)? i also thought it was a little excessive since the kid wasn't armed and was trying to run away. |
|
|
BEEEP... WRONG,,,, Try Again.... Energy = 1/2 mass x velocity squared E= .5 * 2000/32.2 * 51^2 = 215,646,290 ft lbs (we divide 2000 lbs (weight) by the acceleration of gravity (32.2) to get mass) Therefore the VW has 91,336 times more energy than the 12 gauge slug. So the slug will have a similar effect as getting hit by a car... NOT!!! One of the reasons I think many people are having trouble here is the lack of understanding of the law of the conservation of momentum. Mass #1 * Velocity #1 = Mass #2 * Velocity #2 1 oz * 1560 fps = 120 oz (7.5 lb shotgun) * V#2 (I ignored dividing by 32.2 because both side of the equation are divided by the same 32.2 making this step not required) Solve for V#2 and get 13 fps. (Not too much damage to your shouder) Solve for V when the body armor weights 4 lbs =24 fps ( I've been hit by softballs going faster with less suface area... All I got was a bruise. Some of you must be real pansies if you think that will explode your heart) Physics is our friend. It isn't magic. Kent |
||
|
Dang! I should have read further to get to the Fizzasists post. Oh well at least you have some numbers to compare now.
Kent |
|
I'm glad someone read it. It gets hairy when people start using force, energy, impulse, action, pressure and momentum interchangably. |
|
|
Yep, and I've shot 7.62 clear through 6" planks. It's Velocity people, slow slug - fast bullet. If I take a one ounce stone and throw it at you it will hurt. But if I take a much smaller stone and fire it at you with a catapult it going to cut you open and hurt like hell. Andy |
|
|
and a grain of sand at 25,000 mph will blow through a couple inches of aluminum armor but the Whipple Shield looks pretty good. |
||
|
Dang lost my post when it crashed
You have conservation of momentum and conservation of energy working. Sigma (total) Momentum before = Sigma Momentum After Sigma Kinetic Energy Before = Sigma Kinetic Energy After + Work Work is defined as energy converted to heat, etc. My figures came out to about the target would be accelerated to about .3 f/s, assuming no energy lost. You start absorbing energy via plates, and the target giving some by bending and he likely ain't gonna go anywhere but to the liniment locker. You spread impact area and time of event out and you can see the reasons. And if you can absorb/convert that energy outside the chest cavity you win. Compare it to a nurse sticking yer arm with a hypo using the same force in the same area hitting with a plank. Force = MassxAcceleration =PressurexArea Acceleration = Change in Velocity/time Unfortunately the world unlike theoretical physics doesn't exist in a vacumn, so although the projectiles might have the same momentum and energy when leaving the barrel, a slug designed to expend all it's energy in close and not worrying about friction inflicts less pressure but over a greater area but friction will slow it rapidly, a rifle bullet will not have near as much friction and will travel much farther but it's area is much much less and up close because of it's construction might not expand to shed energy and fully penetrate barriers before expending most of it's energy, or the converse be traveling so fast it sheds it's energy extremely quickly and "explodes" before it penetrates enough to do damage. A 40 grn varmint .223 on a grizzly bear skull or ballistic plate, might penetrate a pistol proof vest, a .223 fmj will probably bounce of the grizzly skull and will off many plates. A slug with same energy, might actually penetrate the skull, likely break it or concuss the bear, bounce off the plate Vests and plates are designed to slow the decelleration and or spread the area to defeat the desired energy transfer and bullets are designed to maximze energy transfer on specific types of targets. |
|
Level III and IV vests WILL stop 12 ga. rifled slugs, as well as high-powered rifles using standard ammunition.
The level IV will even stop 166 grain 30.06 armor piercing ammo. |
|
But a .45/70 rifle is also the same weight and velocity as a 12ga slug. Diameter and bullet construction are as big a consideration as velocity. A .458/500gr Solid at 1500fps will also go through several boards or the skull of a Kodiak or Polar bear. But a .719/437gr at 1500fps will flatten out and break up. |
||
|
Well what will go thru it? FMJ or tungsten core .300 Mag? Surely the "proper" African rounds, especially the tungsten core ones. Would a .30-06 or .270 with FMJ? If the 7.62x54R steel core wont... |
||
|
The level IV will stop a .270 no problem.
It will stop up to a 166 grain 30.06 armor piercing round. |
|
As my instructor shouted..."VEST!"
Failure drill AKA "Zipper" Uh - huh. |
|
Ok... shoulder fire a weapon the shoots a VW.... I dare ya! |
||
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.