User Panel
Looks like more #FakeNews
Why do people throw out all these fake headlines |
|
Quoted:
3 groups. yeah sailors for now but that much firepower tends to involve Soldiers, Airmen, and Marines too. Maybe not right away but soon enough. looks like Trump wants to get it on. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Stay safe, soldiers. Stay safe. Sailors. yeah sailors for now but that much firepower tends to involve Soldiers, Airmen, and Marines too. Maybe not right away but soon enough. looks like Trump wants to get it on. Hence why they bring the Marines with them |
|
Quoted:
So whats the gameplan if it actually comes to itshappening.gif? Insanely large coordinated barrage of cruise missiles from every ship and sub in the area to disable as much anti-air as possible immediately followed by a massive air bombing campaign on all known nork arty positions and strategic targets. Land invasion? View Quote |
|
I wonder if someone is trying to saber rattle for Trump. I only ask because I haven't seen a mainstream source, not like that would make a difference these days. Its all noise, fakes news, and selective reporting.
That's just a whole lotta boom in one area. Maybe it'll just be a float by. Keep one group there and the others just roll on by waving at FatBoy. Bet that makes him shit his Hillaries. |
|
Just saw this... Doesn't say much but it mentions "fleet of US aircraft carriers heading to North Korean waters"
Article |
|
What at least 1 tico, and 2 or 3 burkes in each group...maybe an ssgn tagging along...thats a lot of TLAMs. Like multiple hundreds. Then toss in what...9 squadrons of fixed wing...sheeeeeeit. lil Kim needs to pick up the phone and start talking nice before he ends up in a ditch with a broom handle crammed up his ass by his own people.
|
|
|
|
Is the Sea of Japan confined enough to be a dangerous place for a large portion of US fleet?
|
|
Quoted:
Yes but how many ESGs are in the area? I'd think that'd be a bigger indication of something about to kick off. View Quote ESG's with their landing ships and ship-to-shore-connectors do. How many Marines floating around out there? One ESG as part of each CSG? Are there 3,000 trigger pullers out there? Enough to take a major port and a major airfield and hold them pursuant to offloading and landing heavy equipment and Army troops. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Just saw this... Doesn't say much but it mentions "fleet of US aircraft carriers heading to North Korean waters" Article View Quote It's sensationalist bullshit. |
|
Quoted:
My first thought, last I heard there were several carriers confined to port for service or was I misinformed? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
After the last 8 years, we have 3 functional groups?? |
|
If true, that's going to put a new definition to shock and awe.
|
|
From another forum:
At Sea (fwd deploy)
Vinson + CSG: Off North Korea Reagan + CSG: Yokosuka – just finished a Selected Restricted Availability getting ready for sea as of 11 Apr. Bush + CSG: MED Cruise – was in the Persian Gulf until 11 Apr now at sea (where - ?) At Sea (training) Ike + CSG: off the Carolinas on a SUSTEX (exercising optimized fleet response plan) Nimitz +CSG: off SOCAL on COMPUTEX (composite trainex for deployment) Available for surge Roosevelt: was on TSTA/FEP off SOCAL returned to North Island 11 April Washington was conducting FRS carquals off Emerald Isle returned to Norfolk (When - ?) The question marks appear because the Navy quit updating open source ship positions on 11 April. View Quote |
|
How does that command system work if it was true?
Three carrier groups would be the equivalent of a field army? A theatre? Who commands the carriers working together? |
|
IN before low quality Nork movie depicting the sinking of three Imperialist carrier battle groups.
TC |
|
|
|
If fake news should be criminal. Yellow Journalism at its finest
|
|
Quoted:
How does that command system work if it was true? Three carrier groups would be the equivalent of a field army? A theatre? Who commands the carriers working together? View Quote Beyond that, there's the entire command that incorporates the other branches. In this case it's the Pacific Command. |
|
Wasn't the Vinson diverted from their port call?
Maybe they're just being relieved... |
|
Unconfirmed ?
I will wait for this story to be confirmed before getting all uppity and excited about it. |
|
|
Quoted:
The carrier strike groups are part of bigger fleets (Third Fleet, Fourth Fleet, etc.), which are part of even bigger fleets (Pacific Fleet, Fleet Forces Command, etc.). Beyond that, there's the entire command that incorporates the other branches. In this case it's the Pacific Command. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
After the last 8 years, we have 3 functional groups?? View Quote https://news.usni.org/2015/12/22/uss-nimitz-to-remain-in-bremerton-until-2019-to-avoid-homeport-changes-between-maintenance-periods If they expedited repairs and put to sea, that should let you know everything you need to know. |
|
As much as I hate the thought shit probably needs to get done before Lil Kim really does get the ability.
|
|
No idea if this is a real news site, but this shows up in Google News.
https://sputniknews.com/asia/201704171052700019-three-us-aircraft-carriers-korean-peninsula/ |
|
Quoted:
From another forum: At Sea (fwd deploy)
Vinson + CSG: Off North Korea Reagan + CSG: Yokosuka – just finished a Selected Restricted Availability getting ready for sea as of 11 Apr. Bush + CSG: MED Cruise – was in the Persian Gulf until 11 Apr now at sea (where - ?) At Sea (training) Ike + CSG: off the Carolinas on a SUSTEX (exercising optimized fleet response plan) Nimitz +CSG: off SOCAL on COMPUTEX (composite trainex for deployment) Available for surge Roosevelt: was on TSTA/FEP off SOCAL returned to North Island 11 April Washington was conducting FRS carquals off Emerald Isle returned to Norfolk (When - ?) The question marks appear because the Navy quit updating open source ship positions on 11 April. 6 days is enough for any of those CSG's to have relocated almost 5000 miles by now. There's plenty of bullshit news out there, but in this case I'm a little concerned that it might be true. A decapitation strike against Pyongyang *might* work, but only if the Chinese were totally on board with it, and only if complete surprise was accomplished. NK isn't Iraq, if Trump thinks that parking off the coast and launching punitive F/A-18 sorties will make Kim's dick look small and send him home sobbing, the fallout could be cataclysmic. Seoul is the hostage, and if their command structure is left functional enough after a strike to issue orders, tens of thousands of SK citizens are dead. |
|
Quoted:
If that's not a red flag that something is brewing, I don't know what is. Anyone know how often the USN has stopped posting CSG positions before in the past, and for what reasons? 6 days is enough for any of those CSG's to have relocated almost 5000 miles by now. There's plenty of bullshit news out there, but in this case I'm a little concerned that it might be true. A decapitation strike against Pyongyang *might* work, but only if the Chinese were totally on board with it, and only if complete surprise was accomplished. NK isn't Iraq, if Trump thinks that parking off the coast and launching punitive F/A-18 sorties will make Kim's dick look small and send him home sobbing, the fallout could be cataclysmic. Seoul is the hostage, and if their command structure is left functional enough after a strike to issue orders, tens of thousands of SK citizens are dead. View Quote |
|
|
|
http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/politics/2017/04/16/0505000000AKR20170416049452014.HTML?template=2087
Google translate needed... According to a report by South Korea's primary news outlet, Yonhap, the Pentagon has directed a total of three US aircraft carriers toward the Korean Peninsula, citing a South Korean government source. Yonhap reports that in addition to the CVN-70 Carl Vinson, which is expected to arrive off the South Korean coast on April 25, the CVN-76 Ronald Reagan - currently in home port in Yokosuka, Japan - and the CVN-68 Nimitz carrier group - currently undergoing final pre-deployment assessment, Composite Training Unit Exercise off Oregon - will enter the Sea of Japan next week. According to the senior government official. the US and South Korea are discussing joint drills, which will include the three aircraft carriers and other ships. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-17/us-deploys-two-more-aircraft-carriers-toward-korean-peninsula-yonhap US Deploys Two More Aircraft Carriers Toward Korean Peninsula: Yonhap |
|
|
|
Trump Considering "Kinetic Military Action" On North Korea Including "Sudden Strike"
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-04-16/mcmaster-rules-nothing-out-as-trump-team-mulls-north-korea-moves |
|
|
|
This could be intended mostly as a warning to China to get N. Korea back in line.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.