Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 4/29/2011 1:49:46 PM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
Quoted:
My dog eats his own shit....


Good point.


Link Posted: 4/29/2011 1:50:53 PM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:
My dog eats his own shit....


I had a pet that did that.  But then she aint other shit too.
Link Posted: 4/29/2011 1:51:23 PM EDT
[#3]
Petsmart is about to be sued?
Link Posted: 4/29/2011 2:00:27 PM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
The entity in question is a companion if the two of us can talk about hockey, 80s hardcore bands and the relative merits of double maduros, Irish whiskeys and Penelope Cruz vs Salma Hayek. If the entity would prefer to lick its own ass and chase a green dot from a laser pointer around the room, it's a pet.


OK. I'm a pet. You feel good about yourself now, Mr. High and Mighty? "Irish whiskey" reminds me: I know for a  fact you'd lick your ass if you could. From the horse's mouth, as it were. Don't even try to act like you wouldn't.

Link Posted: 4/29/2011 2:01:49 PM EDT
[#5]
So what do I call my corals?
Link Posted: 4/29/2011 2:11:33 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
Quoted:
The entity in question is a companion if the two of us can talk about hockey, 80s hardcore bands and the relative merits of double maduros, Irish whiskeys and Penelope Cruz vs Salma Hayek. If the entity would prefer to lick its own ass and chase a green dot from a laser pointer around the room, it's a pet.


Salma Hayek: companion
Penelope Cruz: pet

And Penelope wouldn't even have to lick her own ass, I'll handle that.



Link Posted: 4/29/2011 2:13:46 PM EDT
[#7]
the first thing that came to my mind when you said you couldn't say the word "Pet" was Penthouse Pets (the ladies) followed by

Polyethylene terephthalate








Quoted:


http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/04/29/animal-academics-using-the-word-pet-insults-your-pet-er-companion/






Animal Academics: Using the Word 'Pet' Insults Your Pet, er, Companion







Here's a frightening thought: The cat ladies are right. Kitties (and their doggie counterparts) are companions, not pets, and calling them otherwise is just plain offensive.




According to a report published in the Journal of Animal Ethics, using "derogatory" terms such as "critters," "beasts," and — you guessed it — "pets" when referring to animals of any kind can affect the way they are treated.




(More on TIME.com: See pictures of surfing dogs)




In other words, a note for animal caretakers (don't even mutter the word "owners" — that's even worse than "pets") everywhere: You're doing it wrong.




We know what you're thinking: What kind of far-out piece of academic research are you alluding to here? But in all seriousness, researchers from the Oxford Center for Animal Ethics, along with the University of Illinois and Penn State University, suggest that using these words to describe animals degrades the relationship that exists between humans and these... friends. (Is that term allowed? We just don't know anymore!). Instead of referring to animals as "wild" and "vermin," which dates back to times when animals were treated unkindly, we should be cultivating a language that shows mutually respectful relationships between humans and the animals that live among us.







"Our existing language about animals is the language of past thought – and the crucial point is that the past is littered with derogatory terminology," the report states. "We shall not be able to think clearly unless we discipline ourselves to use less than partial adjectives in our exploration of animals and our moral relations with them."




So there you have it. Your cat or dog is now your companion, the rats you see on the subway are "free-living" and those pesky pigeons? You know, they're just free-roaming, ready to fly at your face at any moment.




But for what it's worth, we're pretty sure that you dog doesn't mind being called a "pet" just as long as you keep up with the tasty food, belly scratches and long walks around the neighborhood.











 
Link Posted: 4/29/2011 2:34:01 PM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:

Quoted:
I agree.  Positron Emission Tomography doesn't measure positron emission but rather positron reaction with electrons and the resultant emission of gamma twins which are the quantified and localized emission.

I propose the new term to be Positron Reaction Gamma Emission to describe the medical imaging modality.  PET is out.  PRGE is the new accepted acronym.


http://i263.photobucket.com/albums/ii140/roomie21/8fba3fa8.jpg
 




Well played!
Link Posted: 4/29/2011 2:40:52 PM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:

Link Posted: 4/29/2011 2:48:45 PM EDT
[#10]
"Get over here you damn dog!"



"Stupid cat."




Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top