User Panel
We'll know in 2016 whether we have any chance of surviving this as a nation.
If a republican president begins pushing HARD (like Gov. Walker in Wisconsin) to repeal a bunch of O's laws and EO's and eliminate the new CFPB department AND repeal the patriot act and others then we may stand a chance. If they push to just "fix" the worst of O's laws then we're screwed. If Hillary wins then we're screwed and she'll blame evil capitalists for destroying the nation and the press will back her up. |
|
Yet when people talk of GTFO of this country GD heckles them to death.
America as we knew it is over - it's a different game now and we all know where it's headed. |
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Not going to be the last either, Bundesbank and zee Germans are tired of bailing out the other EU countries - we'll see what happens next time Greece needs a bailout. Bundesbank said on Monday that countries about to go bankrupt should draw on the private wealth of their citizens through a one-off capital levy before asking other states for help. Bundesbank Bail-In Statement |
|
Quoted:
We'll know in 2016 whether we have any chance of surviving this as a nation. If a republican president begins pushing HARD (like Gov. Walker in Wisconsin) to repeal a bunch of O's laws and EO's and eliminate the new CFPB department AND repeal the patriot act and others then we may stand a chance. If they push to just "fix" the worst of O's laws then we're screwed. If Hillary wins then we're screwed and she'll blame evil capitalists for destroying the nation and the press will back her up. View Quote The US doesn't do anything gradually, or to fix anything. It has always been Bubble and Burst, Peak and Valley, sudden failure that are catastrophic. Its the American way. |
|
I can hear it now
" if you like your retirement, you can keep your retirement plan". |
|
you can already buy US govt securities in an IRA. If your broker doesn't offer it, go to one that does. Any broker worth their salt will offer them. The mark up on gov't securities to buy from a broker is so fucking small that no one should bitch about the commission. Basically the government is going to be the custodian of the IRA in which the govt securities will be bought/placed. at first, it will work as advertised, then you can bet your ass the govt will figure out some kind of way to use the money for other shit. Do some research on what a custodian does for a qualified account and then get back to me.
|
|
any surprise this is happening?
Obamacare passed in 2009. the elite DC class needs another step towards socialism, and what better a way than this? |
|
|
|
|
|
Allow me to don my tinfoil hat for a moment. Ahem.
The next step is to engineer a HUGE market crash, even worse than 2008. Something that totally wipes out the middle class. Then they can go, okay, we'll help you out. We'll take whatever money you had BEFORE the crash and give it all back to you, but it will be in one of these funds. See, this Treasury Bond is safe from crashes because it's the government. And the people will eat it up. Oh! we gets our monies back! |
|
|
|
Quoted:
No passport here, just have to travel Mexican-style... see a border, jump a border. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
My passport is current. Thank God. No passport here, just have to travel Mexican-style... see a border, jump a border. A seaworthy boat might be the best investment a man can make today. |
|
Quoted: Allow me to don my tinfoil hat for a moment. Ahem. The next step is to engineer a HUGE market crash, even worse than 2008. Something that totally wipes out the middle class. Then they can go, okay, we'll help you out. We'll take whatever money you had BEFORE the crash and give it all back to you, but it will be in one of these funds. See, this Treasury Bond is safe from crashes because it's the government. And the people will eat it up. Oh! we gets our monies back! View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Next step: MANDATORY buying of T-bonds. And if you don't buy them - they will TAKE your traditional holdings in IRAs, 401(k)'s and pensions and give you T-bonds in their place. Just like mandatory health insurance was sold on the idea that "everyone is gonna need health care at some point" - this one will be sold on the idea that "everyone is gonna need retirement/savings at some point". View Quote That was always my underlying concern about the SCOTUS ruling on the ACA. Once it was established that the government can force you to buy something you don't want, government bonds were clearly the next possible case. Then again, the government already forces you to pay into SS, just by virtue of having a job, so it's not really so unprecedented. |
|
Quoted: That was always my underlying concern about the SCOTUS ruling on the ACA. Once it was established that the government can force you to buy something you don't want, government bonds were clearly the next possible case. Then again, the government already forces you to pay into SS, just by virtue of having a job, so it's not really so unprecedented. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Next step: MANDATORY buying of T-bonds. And if you don't buy them - they will TAKE your traditional holdings in IRAs, 401(k)'s and pensions and give you T-bonds in their place. Just like mandatory health insurance was sold on the idea that "everyone is gonna need health care at some point" - this one will be sold on the idea that "everyone is gonna need retirement/savings at some point". That was always my underlying concern about the SCOTUS ruling on the ACA. Once it was established that the government can force you to buy something you don't want, government bonds were clearly the next possible case. Then again, the government already forces you to pay into SS, just by virtue of having a job, so it's not really so unprecedented. Which is why I can see the current SCOTUS holding such a thing up. That is scary as fuck. |
|
Quoted:
While forced loans to governments have a long history, I wouldn't worry too much. Many people who are wealthy, important and powerful make a lot of money managing the assets in retirement funds. If the government were to try and cut off their access to that income, or even reduce that access, they would be unhappy. Politicians do not risk making wealthy, important and powerful people unhappy. View Quote No they give them a waiver and fuck the rest if us. |
|
|
Fuck that. I'll take every cent out of everything and burn it first
|
|
|
Quoted:
That was always my underlying concern about the SCOTUS ruling on the ACA. Once it was established that the government can force you to buy something you don't want, government bonds were clearly the next possible case. Then again, the government already forces you to pay into SS, just by virtue of having a job, so it's not really so unprecedented. View Quote They won't even have to force you to do it- they only have to force your fund manager to in most cases. It will be the same thing with single payer- anyone who has private insurance will simply be mailed a healthcare.gov card after their insurer is appropriated. |
|
Quoted:
Next step: MANDATORY buying of T-bonds. And if you don't buy them - they will TAKE your traditional holdings in IRAs, 401(k)'s and pensions and give you T-bonds in their place. Just like mandatory health insurance was sold on the idea that "everyone is gonna need health care at some point" - this one will be sold on the idea that "everyone is gonna need retirement/savings at some point". ALL wealth belongs to the gov't. View Quote Yep. |
|
All of those IRAs are safe in the Lockbox. We can't touch it. Until we need it. For something that may or maynot be important. But then there will be IOUs. And uh... Lockbox.
|
|
I could see that weasel fuck getting the financial transaction tax that the libs have been pining for and waiving it for Treasury IRAs.
|
|
Quoted:
Oh my God! People buying Treasury Bonds! The horror! View Quote People that choose to do so are free to buy them now. What value does Federal Government involvement and inevitably coercion add? Tax deferment? Will this wind up another forced benefit akin to Obamacare? If you aren't buying health insurance saving for your retirement you will be come a drain on the system, therefore the .gov will see to it you comply or pay the fine. President Obama (may fuck be upon him) is the embodiment of "I'm from the government and I'm here to help you fuck your life up". He is going to pimp an investment that loses money (return vs inflation), and do it to help us? Is everybody from Ames a lefty or government apologist because of the damn University there? Everybody I know from Ames is a commie. |
|
Quoted:
That was always my underlying concern about the SCOTUS ruling on the ACA. Once it was established that the government can force you to buy something you don't want, government bonds were clearly the next possible case. Then again, the government already forces you to pay into SS, just by virtue of having a job, so it's not really so unprecedented. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Next step: MANDATORY buying of T-bonds. And if you don't buy them - they will TAKE your traditional holdings in IRAs, 401(k)'s and pensions and give you T-bonds in their place. Just like mandatory health insurance was sold on the idea that "everyone is gonna need health care at some point" - this one will be sold on the idea that "everyone is gonna need retirement/savings at some point". That was always my underlying concern about the SCOTUS ruling on the ACA. Once it was established that the government can force you to buy something you don't want, government bonds were clearly the next possible case. Then again, the government already forces you to pay into SS, just by virtue of having a job, so it's not really so unprecedented. I honestly wish that I had the foresight to have thought of that. |
|
Quoted:
The trouble is that with Quantitative Easing, no one is buying US Treasuries except the Federal Reserve. The Chinese slowed down their buying and then sold more than they bought. I don't think they're buying any at all now and have been divesting themselves of dollar designated assets for tangibles (mineral rights, mines, farms, land, buildings) in their exit of the dollar. The US government wants to get more buyers and read that federal employees have had their 401Ks diverted to treasury bonds without their consent. In short, it's the sh*tz and when the world dumps the petro-dollar, you don't want to be left holding the bag. Get your 3 B's in order. View Quote What are the 3 B's? |
|
Quoted:
Next step: MANDATORY buying of T-bonds. And if you don't buy them - they will TAKE your traditional holdings in IRAs, 401(k)'s and pensions and give you T-bonds in their place. Just like mandatory health insurance was sold on the idea that "everyone is gonna need health care at some point" - this one will be sold on the idea that "everyone is gonna need retirement/savings at some point". ALL wealth belongs to the gov't. View Quote Bingo, Bingo, We have a winner Ladies and Gentlemen! |
|
I think he should start with a trial run - move the retirement accounts of all unionized Federal workers, employees of the Executive Branch (excepting the Department of Defense), and Congressional staffs into Treasury Bond IRAs first, and see how it works.
If it provides as wildly popular as the Socialists assume, then we can open enrollment to the rest of the public. |
|
Quoted:
No they give them a waiver and fuck the rest if us. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
While forced loans to governments have a long history, I wouldn't worry too much. Many people who are wealthy, important and powerful make a lot of money managing the assets in retirement funds. If the government were to try and cut off their access to that income, or even reduce that access, they would be unhappy. Politicians do not risk making wealthy, important and powerful people unhappy. No they give them a waiver and fuck the rest if us. LOL How would a "waiver" help? The wealthy, important and powerful are making that money from managing the funds owned by the "...rest of us.". |
|
Quoted:
That was always my underlying concern about the SCOTUS ruling on the ACA. Once it was established that the government can force you to buy something you don't want, government bonds were clearly the next possible case. Then again, the government already forces you to pay into SS, just by virtue of having a job, so it's not really so unprecedented. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Next step: MANDATORY buying of T-bonds. And if you don't buy them - they will TAKE your traditional holdings in IRAs, 401(k)'s and pensions and give you T-bonds in their place. Just like mandatory health insurance was sold on the idea that "everyone is gonna need health care at some point" - this one will be sold on the idea that "everyone is gonna need retirement/savings at some point". That was always my underlying concern about the SCOTUS ruling on the ACA. Once it was established that the government can force you to buy something you don't want, government bonds were clearly the next possible case. Then again, the government already forces you to pay into SS, just by virtue of having a job, so it's not really so unprecedented. Nah. Those are all just taxes. John Roberts says so. He's from the gov't, BTW. |
|
Quoted:
People that choose to do so are free to buy them now. What value does Federal Government involvement and inevitably coercion add? Tax deferment? Will this wind up another forced benefit akin to Obamacare? If you aren't buying health insurance saving for your retirement you will be come a drain on the system, therefore the .gov will see to it you comply or pay the fine. President Obama (may fuck be upon him) is the embodiment of "I'm from the government and I'm here to help you fuck your life up". He is going to pimp an investment that loses money (return vs inflation), and do it to help us? Is everybody from Ames a lefty or government apologist because of the damn University there? Everybody I know from Ames is a commie. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Oh my God! People buying Treasury Bonds! The horror! People that choose to do so are free to buy them now. What value does Federal Government involvement and inevitably coercion add? Tax deferment? Will this wind up another forced benefit akin to Obamacare? If you aren't buying health insurance saving for your retirement you will be come a drain on the system, therefore the .gov will see to it you comply or pay the fine. President Obama (may fuck be upon him) is the embodiment of "I'm from the government and I'm here to help you fuck your life up". He is going to pimp an investment that loses money (return vs inflation), and do it to help us? Is everybody from Ames a lefty or government apologist because of the damn University there? Everybody I know from Ames is a commie. Class of ISU, 1995 here. But yeah, everyone I went to school with pretty much is a commie. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
The trouble is that with Quantitative Easing, no one is buying US Treasuries except the Federal Reserve. The Chinese slowed down their buying and then sold more than they bought. I don't think they're buying any at all now and have been divesting themselves of dollar designated assets for tangibles (mineral rights, mines, farms, land, buildings) in their exit of the dollar. The US government wants to get more buyers and read that federal employees have had their 401Ks diverted to treasury bonds without their consent. In short, it's the sh*tz and when the world dumps the petro-dollar, you don't want to be left holding the bag. Get your 3 B's in order. What are the 3 B's? Beans, Bullets, and Bullion. |
|
Now all the obungo loving tards can put their money where their mouth is with their fervent faith in dear leader Hussein.
|
|
Quoted:
Not forever. Study what happened in Nazi Germany. At first, the Nazis worked with the large industrialists. Once they grew powerful enough that they didn't need the captains of industry, they discarded them, too. Much like the health insurance industry was hoodwinked and co-opted to pass Obamacare, the financial services industry will be taken in with promises of continued fees. Anyone who gets in bed with a tyrant deserves to get screwed. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
While forced loans to governments have a long history, I wouldn't worry too much. Many people who are wealthy, important and powerful make a lot of money managing the assets in retirement funds. If the government were to try and cut off their access to that income, or even reduce that access, they would be unhappy. Politicians do not risk making wealthy, important and powerful people unhappy. Not forever. Study what happened in Nazi Germany. At first, the Nazis worked with the large industrialists. Once they grew powerful enough that they didn't need the captains of industry, they discarded them, too. Much like the health insurance industry was hoodwinked and co-opted to pass Obamacare, the financial services industry will be taken in with promises of continued fees. Anyone who gets in bed with a tyrant deserves to get screwed. I've been saying since before the 2012 election results that there WILL be a Hitler'ish genocide in this country before I reach middle age, if I make it that far. Everyone keeps calling me crazy because admitting that I'm right would force them to admit certain things that they don't want to. This is one of the few occasions where I will take no satisfaction in being right. But I am right, it's coming. There won't be an alternative. There will be too many useless mouths on the governments teats so the .gov will need to thin the herd so to speak. Start preparing with your friends now folks. Start thinking like criminals because before long you will have no choice but to. |
|
I am off work tomorrow, and have a feeling I'm either going to pass out from bourbon consumption or stroke out during this sotu.
|
|
|
Now think about how many people on here were talking about Erik Prince taking his money and going somewhere else. They're really going out of their way to make this place less and less attractive.........
|
|
I'm going to watch this thread to see if any of the usual crowd shows up.
If they have the courage to do so. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
In his defense guys, we can't just keep printing more money but we CAN stop spending it. The Members of Congress CANNOT STOP SPENDING MONEY. In August 2011 Congress and the President agreed on modest reductions to the rate of annual increase in spending. Late last year, the Congress and the President agreed to abandon those modest reductions in the rate of increase. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.