Ya know what?
It very well may be BS!
But the fact is, a very compelling story was presented there in such a way that it left to ambiguities when it comes time to check it's voracity.
Dullards who mindlessly bleat "BS" or, vise versa, who mindlessly support something without checking the facts, are just that. Dullards.
I am open to the fact that it's a possibility. Give the actions at Waco, Ruby Ridge and the like, these people have shown themselves as assholes on more than one occasion.
The same people blindly calling "BS" here would have been the same ones calling "BS" about the facts of Ruby Ridge before Gerry Spense took it to trial and opened the books.
They’re calling BS not because of what they “know”; they’re calling BS because it helps them continue on with what they choose to believe.
None of us were there, none of us know anything for sure.
The only thing that is "for sure" is that there is the typical coterie of retards who will accept or refute things based on their own preconceptions, rather than the possibilities of truths that might exist.
The dunces are in confederacy here, as is usual.