User Panel
I don't know what's more disturbing.......
The low self esteem of a woman who let 919 guys plow her like a piece of useless meat..... .....or the poster here who took the time and mathematically worked out the liquid volume equation of jizz the woman received. |
|
Heard a photographer on a radio show talking about The Houston 500 or some such. His job was taking photos for posterity.
Had to have been twenty years ago or so. Sounded unhygienic. |
|
919 PENETRATIONS, not 919 participants.
It was more like 10-15 guys 919 times, at 30 seconds per contact. IIRC the rules actually said it needed to be in there 30-60 seconds to count, 61 seconds would not count towards the total. Once her lead over the Brazilian was too great to be overcome in the remaining time, she quit and so did the Brazilian. |
|
|
Quoted: I know I’m going to regret this, but where do you draw the line? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I do not mind going down on some sweet vijayjay. But i would have to pass there, especially if I was number 920. I know I’m going to regret this, but where do you draw the line? Pretty gross, gotta draw the line after like 5 right? A man has to have standards. |
|
Quoted: https://unrealfacts.com/a-woman-had-sex-with-919-men-in-a-day/ On October 16, 2004, in Warsaw, Poland, porn actress Lisa Sparks (Lisa Sparxxx in 2004) set a new world record for having sex with the most men in a single day. She achieved this record by having sex with 919 men over a period of 12 hours. That would mean she spent only 45 seconds having sex with each man, which is about 13.5 seconds longer than is often necessary. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b4/Lisa_Sparxxx_2.jpg View Quote |
|
|
I remember reading that article somewhere else. There was only about 15 men but they counted as extra because they had a merry-go-round system set up.
Give it about 10 pumps and get back in line. |
|
|
|
A riddle:
We’ve all heard of sloppy seconds and even terrible thirds, but what do you call number 917 of 919? Scroll down for answer… . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Keep scrolling…. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fucking disgusting fucking. |
|
"only 45 seconds having sex with each man, which is about 13.5 seconds longer than is often necessary."
My wife would argue even 31.5 seconds is 31.5 seconds longer than necessary. Kharn |
|
|
If they made it a double she could have got home in time to cook the boyfriends dinner.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Three comments... 1) how tf did they find 919 men willing to have sex with the same woman on the same day 2) no way they got to finish, that's 1838 blue balls 3) it would have really sucked to be #919 View Quote Did occur to you that he may have been the only one to actually get a shot on goal? |
|
So when it’s says she “Had Sex” with that many men, was it intercourse with each, or was she three holing it, and using both hands for 5 at a time?
|
|
|
|
You know how if you had gum or candy in school, you could get in trouble for not having enough to share with the whole class?
I guess one way to reduce the workplace drama of employees having affairs would be to just bang ALL of the employees on the first day. |
|
I can't imagine why anyone would want to participate in that sort of thing.
|
|
I've said it before and I'll say it again. The one thing this country still manufactures, and manufactures well, are whores.
|
|
Only surprising thing about it these days was she did it in 1 day, while most skanks take 20 years to rack up 900 sex partners.
|
|
Quoted: It was a competition at the world gangbang conference. (Yeah, we both read that right) Second place was 900. It’s a video event im sure. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Pic of the 919 men, for reference purposes? It was a competition at the world gangbang conference. (Yeah, we both read that right) Second place was 900. It’s a video event im sure. And no one remembers the name of the woman who came in second. YOLO. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: If Chic-fil-a was running it, she could have been nailed by 1,800 or so. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Three comments... 1) how tf did they find 919 men willing to have sex with the same woman on the same day 2) no way they got to finish, that's 1838 blue balls 3) it would have really sucked to be #919 If Chic-fil-a was running it, she could have been nailed by 1,800 or so. |
|
I seem to remember this story and they had pics of a long line of dudes and a group of women 'fluffers" that helped speed the process.
Gross |
|
|
Quoted:
919 PENETRATIONS, not 919 participants. It was more like 10-15 guys 919 times, at 30 seconds per contact. IIRC the rules actually said it needed to be in there 30-60 seconds to count, 61 seconds would not count towards the total. Once her lead over the Brazilian was too great to be overcome in the remaining time, she quit and so did the Brazilian. View Quote |
|
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Did they all finish? She's full. https://nairobinewsnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/EvQR4eAXUAcZTOq-1.jpg |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.