User Panel
Quoted: http://www.onenewsnow.com/perspectives/bryan-fischer/2014/06/17/the-latest-in-scientific-research-there-is-no-gay-gene#.VLrx4MZSJpc View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: No, no one with half a brain will say its a choice. You might, because hey, maybe I could convince you to suck a dick. Thats on you, though. No one's judging. |
|
Quoted: Many people have the same opinion of religion. Should we ban that as well? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Who cares? Should we ban that as well? |
|
No the will be asked to rule on whether the Bible is hate speech or not.
|
|
Quoted:
http://www.onenewsnow.com/perspectives/bryan-fischer/2014/06/17/the-latest-in-scientific-research-there-is-no-gay-gene#.VLrx4MZSJpc View Quote You'd have to actually read that, incredibly biased, article to figure out that even from the cherry picked data they are using, no scientist is reaching a conclusion. Try again. |
|
Quoted: And now its time for government enforcement of your cultural peccadilloes. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The salad days of government legitimization of your cultural peccadilloes are done. And now its time for government enforcement of your cultural peccadilloes. I wish, since my cultural peccadillo is for the government to leave people alone. It's not my fault that you're addicted to the feelz Uncle Sugar gives you. |
|
Quoted:
A church cannot teach or refuse homosexual marriage or leadership. It NOW becomes a constitutionally supported right. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Lets face it, if the US Supreme courts say marriage is unequal, then our whole society will change forever. 36 states already allow for same sex marriage (that's the majority of them if math is hard), and society hasn't descended into chaos yet... apparently, you still have yet to make the link of what a US constitutional/supreme court verdict would mean to religious organizations of religious beliefs. What has it meant thus far? That's not even an English sentence. Try again, please. |
|
Quoted: No one has ever said this. NO ONE. Human Behavior is HARD/SOFT Science. You are hard pressed to find 100% of people doing anything for the same reason. I DO KNOW that increase violence in those who have no empathy/predisposition to aggression will resort to violence before peaceful resolution/problem solving. Just look at the criminal pop. Anyways, behavior is mostly learned and if this is the case, we are now telling children whose sexuality is developing, that it is NOW a choice. Is that so hard to understand? View Quote |
|
Quoted: You'd have to actually read that, incredibly biased, article to figure out that even from the cherry picked data they are using, no scientist is reaching a conclusion. Try again. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: http://www.onenewsnow.com/perspectives/bryan-fischer/2014/06/17/the-latest-in-scientific-research-there-is-no-gay-gene#.VLrx4MZSJpc You'd have to actually read that, incredibly biased, article to figure out that even from the cherry picked data they are using, no scientist is reaching a conclusion. Try again. |
|
|
Quoted: There's some evidence that it could be related to hormone exposure in the womb. It doesn't have to be genetic to be present at birth. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No, no one with half a brain will say its a choice. You might, because hey, maybe I could convince you to suck a dick. Thats on you, though. No one's judging. http://www.onenewsnow.com/perspectives/bryan-fischer/2014/06/17/the-latest-in-scientific-research-there-is-no-gay-gene#.VLrx4MZSJpc There's some evidence that it could be related to hormone exposure in the womb. It doesn't have to be genetic to be present at birth. Epigenetics. It scares them to contemplate that a small environmental change would have them catching for the other team. |
|
Quoted:
So many more important things to be focusing on..... and people get hung up on these "distractions". Why does OP care about who marries who? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Who cares? So many more important things to be focusing on..... and people get hung up on these "distractions". Why does OP care about who marries who? The Supreme Court cares therefore I cate. |
|
Quoted: Really? Then why did McCain and Lieberman try to form a commission to study whether video games and youth violence are connected? How about all the preachers that have called rap and rock n roll were the instruments of the devil? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: No one has ever said this. NO ONE. Human Behavior is HARD/SOFT Science. You are hard pressed to find 100% of people doing anything for the same reason. I DO KNOW that increase violence in those who have no empathy/predisposition to aggression will resort to violence before peaceful resolution/problem solving. Just look at the criminal pop. Anyways, behavior is mostly learned and if this is the case, we are now telling children whose sexuality is developing, that it is NOW a choice. Is that so hard to understand? |
|
Quoted: I care. I do not agree with it and developmentally to a child, it is dangerous. We are now saying that it is a "choice". View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Who cares? |
|
Quoted:
Lets face it, if the US Supreme courts say marriage is unequal, then our whole society will change forever. How long before Disney makes teen movies with gays loving gays? View Quote As long as they don't show negro queers mixing with white queers I guess it's ok. |
|
Quoted: So all it would take was for you to watch a Disney show before you would want suck a cock? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Who cares? |
|
Quoted: View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No one has ever said this. NO ONE. Human Behavior is HARD/SOFT Science. You are hard pressed to find 100% of people doing anything for the same reason. I DO KNOW that increase violence in those who have no empathy/predisposition to aggression will resort to violence before peaceful resolution/problem solving. Just look at the criminal pop. Anyways, behavior is mostly learned and if this is the case, we are now telling children whose sexuality is developing, that it is NOW a choice. Is that so hard to understand? |
|
Another gay thread in GD. CLEARLY the fault of the forum's homonazi elite.
OP, is there something you want to tell us? |
|
Quoted:
Not interested in meeting your burden of proof. I have this feeling you will continue denying shit. I would like to know if you have ANY understanding of human development THEN I will continue or else arguing shit with someone who knows nothing about something they are arguing becomes a waste of time. Oh hell, I'll start. I have 3 degrees and working on a PHD in Mental health/human behavior. You? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
http://www.onenewsnow.com/perspectives/bryan-fischer/2014/06/17/the-latest-in-scientific-research-there-is-no-gay-gene#.VLrx4MZSJpc You'd have to actually read that, incredibly biased, article to figure out that even from the cherry picked data they are using, no scientist is reaching a conclusion. Try again. What areas of mental health and human behavior have studied? What is your area of study for your PHD? Having degrees in a science as vast and varied as "mental health" or "human behavior" isn't much of an endorsement when we're discussing something actual scientists have been keenly following and investigating for 3 decades with no real conclusions. |
|
Quoted:
A church cannot teach or refuse homosexual marriage or leadership. It NOW becomes a constitutionally supported right. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Lets face it, if the US Supreme courts say marriage is unequal, then our whole society will change forever. 36 states already allow for same sex marriage (that's the majority of them if math is hard), and society hasn't descended into chaos yet... apparently, you still have yet to make the link of what a US constitutional/supreme court verdict would mean to religious organizations of religious beliefs. What has it meant thus far? No church can be forced to marry two people. Try getting married in a Catholic church and you're not Catholic. |
|
Quoted:
Many gays will say it is a choice. The bigger problem is if it is NOT a choice, then we are NORMALIZING a sickness. Those who enjoy and are turned on by children claim it is NOT a choice as well. We are fucked and those who say not are fucked by claiming they need research and void of common sense. Do me a favor, don't be parents. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Who cares? No one with half a brain is saying that. I'm a parent and I have a question for you. What will you do if your child tells you that he/she is gay? |
|
I can't believe how many "straight" guys here spend endless hours thinking about all the possible ways they may be "offended" by someone else being gay.
|
|
Anyone saying that being gay is a choice is admitting they would put a cock in their mouth no problem, but simply choose not to.
Me? I couldnt ever. Not attracted in any way. Im born straight. Just the way I am. Cant help what Im attracted to. Ergo; not a choice.
|
|
Quoted:
No. Much more subtle. If it is constitutional, any refusal would be a legal issue and one's conscious in belief is now attacked. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Who cares? That's not how law works. You should stick to mental health. |
|
Quoted: Show me where I said I'm interested in exposing 5 year olds to sexuality. I'm not, whether it's hetero or homo. I may be wrong, but I'm not aware of any Disney shows involving sexuality at all. But if there's suddenly some new show where Billy has two mommies, it's not going to make kids turn out gay. If that were the case, wouldn't it stand to reason that exposure to heterosexuality would make them turn out straight? I guess gay people didn't have TVs as kids. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: As a young child, you can pretty much be talked into doing anything. Tell me, why are you so interested in 5 year old's being exposed to sexuality? Gay or not? It says a lot more about the gay-apologists than it doe's about those who oppose it. Show me where I said I'm interested in exposing 5 year olds to sexuality. I'm not, whether it's hetero or homo. I may be wrong, but I'm not aware of any Disney shows involving sexuality at all. But if there's suddenly some new show where Billy has two mommies, it's not going to make kids turn out gay. If that were the case, wouldn't it stand to reason that exposure to heterosexuality would make them turn out straight? I guess gay people didn't have TVs as kids. It forces the issue. Kids are used to seeing mommy and daddy - most don't ask questions about it consequently, and it's pretty easy to avoid, and if you can't avoid it, I can't think of any couple who would be mad if their kid was straight. Because gay couples have sex, they don't make babies, the choice and/or aberration raises questions and forces the issue of sexuality. Like it or not, not everyone is going to approve of the gay lifestyle, and those people should be allowed to defer its discussion until their kids reach an age of their choosing to discuss sexuality. Basically, society is insistent on group-raising our youth. CNN has a kids show they show in schools. Sex ed is age structured for the most developed, least-parented kids. Teachers make kids write papers on global warming and other bullshit. The gay agenda is another thing where, if the gay agenda wasn't so radical, they'd be wise not to force the issue on normal families because then normal families wouldn't care. But they do, which is why we have these butthurt threads. I'm like most people - don't give a shit what people do, but no, you don't get to foist your peculiarities on everyone through media. I don't care about gays one bit but for their insistence on "I'm here and I'm queer and you're going to like it." No, go the fuck away. That goes for vampires and all you piece of shit bronies and the rest of the fucking weirdos out there too. Seriously, half of the people who have beef would not give a shit if you would just shut the fuck up and do your thing without broadcasting your issues through demanding to be acknowledged and loved by society at large. But no. And Disney being the anti-gun, animal rights, global warming, rich-vilifying bastion of progressive undertones that it is, will more than happily pick up the gay agenda and tell parents "Your kids are going to receive this transmission and like it." |
|
Quoted:
I can't believe how many "straight" guys here spend endless hours thinking about all the possible ways they may be "offended" by someone else being gay. View Quote According to posters in several of these threads, the threads are entirely the fault of GD's "rabid gay liberal contingent". Therefore, OP must be gay. |
|
Quoted: Not interested in meeting your burden of proof. I have this feeling you will continue denying shit. I would like to know if you have ANY understanding of human development THEN I will continue or else arguing shit with someone who knows nothing about something they are arguing becomes a waste of time. Oh hell, I'll start. I have 3 degrees and working on a PHD in Mental health/human behavior. You? View Quote What religion-based college are you in?
|
|
Quoted: I say for some YES. If you are asserting or implying that humans are NOT IN THE LEAST impacted by social influences/violence then you are an imbecile. Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No one has ever said this. NO ONE. Human Behavior is HARD/SOFT Science. You are hard pressed to find 100% of people doing anything for the same reason. I DO KNOW that increase violence in those who have no empathy/predisposition to aggression will resort to violence before peaceful resolution/problem solving. Just look at the criminal pop. Anyways, behavior is mostly learned and if this is the case, we are now telling children whose sexuality is developing, that it is NOW a choice. Is that so hard to understand? |
|
|
Quoted: That's not how law works. You should stick to mental health. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Who cares? That's not how law works. You should stick to mental health. |
|
You mean they don't already?
Ya they dooooo http://www.amplifyingglass.com/disneys-first-openly-gay-animation/ |
|
|
ITT: Christians charged with the holy duty of being judgmental, intolerant assholes to others. Orders straight from the big man himself apparently.
|
|
Quoted: What areas of mental health and human behavior have studied? What is your area of study for your PHD? Having degrees in a science as vast and varied as "mental health" or "human behavior" isn't much of an endorsement when we're discussing something actual scientists have been keenly following and investigating for 3 decades with no real conclusions. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: http://www.onenewsnow.com/perspectives/bryan-fischer/2014/06/17/the-latest-in-scientific-research-there-is-no-gay-gene#.VLrx4MZSJpc You'd have to actually read that, incredibly biased, article to figure out that even from the cherry picked data they are using, no scientist is reaching a conclusion. Try again. What areas of mental health and human behavior have studied? What is your area of study for your PHD? Having degrees in a science as vast and varied as "mental health" or "human behavior" isn't much of an endorsement when we're discussing something actual scientists have been keenly following and investigating for 3 decades with no real conclusions. |
|
|
Quoted:
Show me where I said I'm interested in exposing 5 year olds to sexuality. I'm not, whether it's hetero or homo. I may be wrong, but I'm not aware of any Disney shows involving sexuality at all. But if there's suddenly some new show where Billy has two mommies, it's not going to make kids turn out gay. If that were the case, wouldn't it stand to reason that exposure to heterosexuality would make them turn out straight? I guess gay people didn't have TVs as kids. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
As a young child, you can pretty much be talked into doing anything. Tell me, why are you so interested in 5 year old's being exposed to sexuality? Gay or not? It says a lot more about the gay-apologists than it doe's about those who oppose it. Show me where I said I'm interested in exposing 5 year olds to sexuality. I'm not, whether it's hetero or homo. I may be wrong, but I'm not aware of any Disney shows involving sexuality at all. But if there's suddenly some new show where Billy has two mommies, it's not going to make kids turn out gay. If that were the case, wouldn't it stand to reason that exposure to heterosexuality would make them turn out straight? I guess gay people didn't have TVs as kids. Disney's target audience is pre-pubescent children. Yes? You were making an argument that kids couldn't be "talked into sucking dicks if you saw gays on TV". The OP was asking if more homosexuality would be shown to said pre-pubescent children as a result of a Supreme Court decision. I would argue that they could be talked into it, since young children are impressionable, and you showed an indifference to that actually happening. Which is disgusting and immoral. Or are you not aware of what this thread is about? |
|
Quoted:
Too late, the cock smokers already have a week at Disney........ http://www.lasplash.com/uploads//d1d4/4e715a1d1ccf9-gay-days-disneyland-resort-anaheim-1.jpg View Quote As a kid we would go to Disney every year, it just so happened it was always for gay pride week. Knowing my dad rooms were cheaper that week Being a 6-7 year old kid and seeing that, I thought that was odd to see, but it didn't make me want to hold a guys hand or kiss him. Hell as kids the princess falls in love with a frog, beast etc that doesn't mean girls are going to want to marry their pets all of a sudden |
|
No church can be forced to marry two people. Try getting married in a Catholic church and you're not Catholic. View Quote |
|
Quoted: That's not how law works. You should stick to mental health. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Who cares? That's not how law works. You should stick to mental health. |
|
Quoted:
I always like to point out to people who use that logic that every gay person walking the earth was created by a heterosexual couple. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
As a young child, you can pretty much be talked into doing anything. Tell me, why are you so interested in 5 year old's being exposed to sexuality? Gay or not? It says a lot more about the gay-apologists than it doe's about those who oppose it. Show me where I said I'm interested in exposing 5 year olds to sexuality. I'm not, whether it's hetero or homo. I may be wrong, but I'm not aware of any Disney shows involving sexuality at all. But if there's suddenly some new show where Billy has two mommies, it's not going to make kids turn out gay. If that were the case, wouldn't it stand to reason that exposure to heterosexuality would make them turn out straight? I guess gay people didn't have TVs as kids. I always like to point out to people who use that logic that every gay person walking the earth was created by a heterosexual couple. Technically no, IUI could occur where all parties are gay |
|
Quoted: ITT: Christians charged with the holy duty of being judgmental, intolerant assholes to others. Orders straight from the big man himself apparently. View Quote Well, if they can be talked into believing something as incredible as... Then they could surely be talked into su... Nevermind.
|
|
Quoted:
EXACTLY, and now the highest court in the land is concluding on what is normal human behavior. Whats next? I am a clinical counselor and have worked with children and families for 20 years in practice. View Quote Have you found that praying the gay away is a successful counseling technique? |
|
Quoted:
It's about the gays getting married leading to the downfall of society. Or, more accurately: http://theholbornmag.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/anxious-nervous-woman-wringing-handkerchief-in-her-hands.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
It's about the gays getting married leading to the downfall of society. Or, more accurately: http://theholbornmag.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/anxious-nervous-woman-wringing-handkerchief-in-her-hands.jpg The question at hand... Quoted:
Lets face it, if the US Supreme courts say marriage is unequal, then our whole society will change forever. How long before Disney makes teen movies with gays loving gays? |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.