[ARCHIVED THREAD] - How Wolves Change Rivers (Page 2 of 2)
|
Quoted: Serious question, why the need to reintroduce a predator when humans are more than adequate at predation? Allow hunting there, or up the tag limit if it's already allowed. ETA: I used the word "predation"; your argument is invalid. For tourists pictures, anti-hunting reasons from outsiders, and other feel good stuff. Wolves were eradicated in Wyoming for a century, and the ecosystem managed along just fine.
|
|
Quoted:
For tourists pictures, anti-hunting reasons from outsiders, and other feel good stuff. Wolves were eradicated in Wyoming for a century, and the ecosystem managed along just fine. Quoted:
Quoted:
Serious question, why the need to reintroduce a predator when humans are more than adequate at predation? Allow hunting there, or up the tag limit if it's already allowed. ETA: I used the word "predation"; your argument is invalid. For tourists pictures, anti-hunting reasons from outsiders, and other feel good stuff. Wolves were eradicated in Wyoming for a century, and the ecosystem managed along just fine. No it didn't. Without the wolves the rivers just ran wild. It was fucking bedlam. |
|
Quoted: No it didn't. Without the wolves the rivers just ran wild. It was fucking bedlam. Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Serious question, why the need to reintroduce a predator when humans are more than adequate at predation? Allow hunting there, or up the tag limit if it's already allowed. ETA: I used the word "predation"; your argument is invalid. For tourists pictures, anti-hunting reasons from outsiders, and other feel good stuff. Wolves were eradicated in Wyoming for a century, and the ecosystem managed along just fine. No it didn't. Without the wolves the rivers just ran wild. It was fucking bedlam. It was pandemonium!
|