User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:07:25 PM EDT
[#1]
Anyone else notice the comments on the facebook page supporting the thieves are almost exclusively women?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:08:04 PM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:
"No Charges Filed" https://scontent.fhsv1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/17884376_1466219300086991_1612091016624022835_n.jpg?oh=e6bbc8c0db5c83d91f72a4f19c39fdee&oe=5982A286 https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1466219473420307&id=172140726161528 https://scontent.fhsv1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-1/p50x50/14732270_1241580689217521_4547750418611202650_n.jpg?oh=1f50827fe4d2316def2dc91170b0d37a&oe=597E8C95
Cohasset Police Department, Cohasset MA · April 14 at 4:57pm · PRESS RELEASE: Cohasset Police detectives executed a search warrant on Doane Street at approximately 2pm today. The search warrant was issued by a Clerk Magistrate of the Quincy District Court after police received a credible report that the occupant of 50 Doane Street had numerous unsecured rifles and shotguns strewn about his house. While officers were conducting the search, they located more than 2-dozen unsecured long guns and 5-large military grade ordinance shells. When the military shells were found, officers backed out of the home and notified the Massachusetts State Police Bomb Squad. Members of the bomb squad arrived, assessed the shells, notified the United States Navy, and requested that they respond to take custody of the items. It is not known if the shells are live or not. The occupant of the home is a 65-year old male who lives alone. Detectives are still interviewing him and no charges have been filed at this point. The man does have a license to possess riffles and shotguns, which was revoked by the Cohasset Police Chief today. All of his weapons have been seized. This case remains under investigation by the Cohasset Police. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:08:36 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Everyone who owns an AR15 in that state is already a felon, once AG Healy re-interpreted the AWB this year. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:09:33 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What does "unsecured rifles and shotguns" mean here? Is there a law in Mass ordering gun owners to lock up their guns?  Attached File"But I saw all the scary rifles LAYING AROUND and HAD to do muh civic duty!!" |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:10:13 PM EDT
[#5]
Officer looks like he's deciding which guns are going to suddenly become "unaccounted for".
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:11:21 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: FMass. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:13:03 PM EDT
[#7]
bet he was turned in by visiting angels or similar care group
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:14:05 PM EDT
[#8]
What a crock.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:14:46 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Oh yes. Big time. Firearms and ammo stored separately as well. "We must also address the District’s requirement (as applied to respondent’s handgun) that firearms in the home be rendered and kept inoperable at all times. This makes it impossible for citizens to use them for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional. The District argues that we should interpret this element of the statute to contain an exception for self-defense. See Brief for Petitioners 56–57. But we think that is precluded by the unequivocal text, and by the presence of certain other enumerated exceptions: “Except for law enforcement personnel … , each registrant shall keep any firearm in his possession unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock or similar device unless such firearm is kept at his place of business, or while being used for lawful recreational purposes within the District of Columbia.” D. C. Code §7–2507.02. The nonexistence of a self-defense exception is also suggested by the D. C. Court of Appeals’ statement that the statute forbids residents to use firearms to stop intruders, see McIntosh v. Washington, 395 A. 2d 744, 755–756 (1978).28" |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:14:54 PM EDT
[#10]
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Oh wait.... |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:15:31 PM EDT
[#11]
Boston Strong.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:17:33 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Anyone else notice the comments on the facebook page supporting the thieves are almost exclusively women? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:20:25 PM EDT
[#13]
They deleted my comment too
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:21:09 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What's the date on that law? I suspect Heller would invalidate it. "We must also address the District’s requirement (as applied to respondent’s handgun) that firearms in the home be rendered and kept inoperable at all times. This makes it impossible for citizens to use them for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional. The District argues that we should interpret this element of the statute to contain an exception for self-defense. See Brief for Petitioners 56–57. But we think that is precluded by the unequivocal text, and by the presence of certain other enumerated exceptions: “Except for law enforcement personnel … , each registrant shall keep any firearm in his possession unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock or similar device unless such firearm is kept at his place of business, or while being used for lawful recreational purposes within the District of Columbia.” D. C. Code §7–2507.02. The nonexistence of a self-defense exception is also suggested by the D. C. Court of Appeals’ statement that the statute forbids residents to use firearms to stop intruders, see McIntosh v. Washington, 395 A. 2d 744, 755–756 (1978).28" 1. Search and the confiscation was a violation of the (recently) incorporated constitutional jurisprudence. 2. Whoever authorized and executed the warrant violated their oaths as police officers. 3. Firearm collection was most likely damaged in the way it the items were transported. I see the taxpayers writing a hefty check for the agency's fuck up on this one. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:25:49 PM EDT
[#15]
Comments are now locked. All my comments were deleted.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:26:14 PM EDT
[#16]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:26:15 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Comments are now locked. All my comments were deleted. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:27:45 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Comments are now locked. All my comments were deleted. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:28:39 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They deleted my comment too |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:29:17 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They are not locked, they deleted your comments and banned you Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Comments are now locked. All my comments were deleted. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:37:40 PM EDT
[#21]
They deleted my comment and banned me oh no lol
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:38:03 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
1) post again 2) take a screenshot 3) wait for them to delete your comment 4) submit a notarized FOIA request for comments, including yours 5) sue the ever-loving shit out of them for destroying public records |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:38:07 PM EDT
[#23]
The man does have a license to possess riffles and shotguns, which was revoked by the Cohasset Police Chief today. 
I was under the impression that the Bill of Rights was our license to possess firearms. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:39:36 PM EDT
[#24]
Assholechusetts at it again, eh?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:39:42 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I was under the impression that the Bill of Rights was our license to possess firearms. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:40:19 PM EDT
[#26]
Sounds like a case that should go to the Supreme Court!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:41:07 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Aclu sued the governor of MD for this very reason |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:41:37 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Sounds like a case that should go to the Supreme Court! |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:41:51 PM EDT
[#29]
Sooooo glad I got out of that state 22 years ago.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:42:13 PM EDT
[#30]
I have said it before and I will say it again, fuck the Northeast. A beautiful part of the country that is ruined by large cities dictating how those in the country should live.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:44:25 PM EDT
[#31]
I spent about an hour yesterday giving the state police the make, model and serial numbers of all My handguns.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:44:58 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I have said it before and I will say it again, fuck the Northeast. A beautiful part of the country that is ruined by large cities dictating how those in the country should live. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:45:53 PM EDT
[#33]
Those fuckers just took down the ability to post pictures, they must not have liked the memes I posted
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:47:12 PM EDT
[#34]
This is a perfect case of how confiscation will eventually come to every state. Somebody will dime you out. Not door to door.
Don't store all your eggs in one basket, either. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:47:23 PM EDT
[#35]
1st post!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:47:32 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I feel so much safer.
Coming to a state near you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:47:57 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Great maple syrup though! |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:49:11 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Sooooo glad I got out of that state 22 years ago. Escaped first to New Hampshire and then to the Midwest. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:49:54 PM EDT
[#39]
So his license was revoked, and because he had a license they knew he had guns, so they went and took them?
Thats a perfect example of everything wrong with licensing and registration.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:50:51 PM EDT
[#40]
Fuck every one of those oath breaking "I'm just following orders" assholes.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:51:08 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I spent about an hour yesterday giving the state police the make, model and serial numbers of all My handguns.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:51:58 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I spent about an hour yesterday giving the state police the make, model and serial numbers of all My handguns. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:52:31 PM EDT
[#43]
f**king liberals.
If he lived in a red state no one would have gave two s**ts |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:54:55 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Keep fighting the good fight there officer fatshit. Thank you for your service Remember, in Massachusetts, in order to become a sworn police officer, you must first meet the very stringent requirement of having your Dad, Uncle, or Brother In Law be a high ranking officer of the department in the city or town you are applying for. These are ELITE of nepotism we are talking here! |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:56:37 PM EDT
[#45]
Had a bunch of feral hogs come through my yard last night,,,tore it up pretty good,,I didn`t see if they were fat or had beards or not
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:57:53 PM EDT
[#46]
Gun confiscation by the king's men in Massachusetts is how this country got started.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:59:16 PM EDT
[#47]
Who notified the Stasi?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 4:59:28 PM EDT
[#48]
Wrong on so many levels. Whoever posted the Officer Fatty comment made me laugh though. If I had a facebook account I would post the instructions.
1) post again 2) take a screenshot 3) wait for them to delete your comment 4) submit a notarized FOIA request for comments, including yours 5) sue the ever-loving shit out of them for destroying public records |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 5:00:14 PM EDT
[#49]
The scratches and dings on them from piling them up like that alone would make me livid.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/17/2017 5:02:55 PM EDT
[#50]
I'll be mailing these traitors a picture of my balls since it's obvious none of them have any.
Thankfully my boss has stated, on record, he would use the agency MRAP to defend the gunowners should it ever come to that. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
