Quote History Quoted:
I hope you are right.
The way I see it is the RNC has an amazing ability to snatch defeat from the arms of victory.
Loosing the Senate, a Biden "nomination is an appointment. Sure there is the UN charter to work around, but Who would've thought this shitstain with a false Bio, would be re-elected, now holding meetings of felons with ankle bracelets going off in the whitehouse, as Europe inundates itself with terrorists, 15 years after 9/11 we have open boarders importing them here, after paying Iran $150 Billion to develop nukes and missiles.
You assure me once again in this backwards land that we exist in today that its not plausible.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
He tells Lynch to indite HildaWitch, the DNC nominates Biden, the RNC doesn't run Trump, Ryan, Kaisch, Romney, or whomever looses to Biden...
Biden
appoints nominates Barry Sotero UN Secretary General,
the Senate holds hearings but doesn't act, the UN Security Counsel laughs, and thousands of suckers in GD who have bought this whole distraction are left feeling vaguely confused, as if they were trolled.
I swear I need to install Greasemonkey just to filter all the posts with this retarded "Obama as Secretary General/New World Order Dictator For Life" crap.
I hope you are right.
The way I see it is the RNC has an amazing ability to snatch defeat from the arms of victory.
Loosing the Senate, a Biden "nomination is an appointment. Sure there is the UN charter to work around, but Who would've thought this shitstain with a false Bio, would be re-elected, now holding meetings of felons with ankle bracelets going off in the whitehouse, as Europe inundates itself with terrorists, 15 years after 9/11 we have open boarders importing them here, after paying Iran $150 Billion to develop nukes and missiles.
You assure me once again in this backwards land that we exist in today that its not plausible.
No, it is not "plausible." The UN Charter specifically requires unanimous approval of a Secretary General nominee by all members of the security council. By longstanding arrangement the SG does not come from the 5 permanent members - I thought it was in the charter, but I was wrong. So, there are 2 issues:
1) Why would the other 4 permanent members agree to break that tradition? Sure, we could promise to support THEIR candidates in the future, but even if the Cult of Obama could get the REST of the UN to go with it for him, why would they support an SG from the other 4? Ever?
2) Even if we could get them to agree to an SG from the US, why do you think they would agree to him in particular? He's managed to insult all of them, starting with removing Churchill's bust, through the James Taylor apology, etc. Everyone in the world, except the Democrats in the US, knows that he is a foreign policy disaster.
So, plausible? No. Possible? Sure - *anything* is possible. It's possible the sun won't rise tomorrow. It's possible the Cubans will drop from hijacked airliners. But I'm not betting that way. There is SO MUCH MORE LIKELY problems for the future than the exceedingly remote possibility of Obama taking a job at one of the most ineffectual international organizations in existence.