Quoted: If you can wait until tomorrow, yes I can prove it. I don't have my old textbooks at work, since I usually don't need them there.
|
I'll agree with you to the point that - if given a choice - you'd want to eat liver from a yougner animal as opposed to an older one, because I'm sure some accumulation of various chemicals in the liver might make it taste less good. That's not a problem, since most liver you buy is from young animals (calf livver, chicken livers, etc). However, the fact remains that liver is generally considered one of the most nutrituous parts of the body to eat, rich in protein, vitamins and iron.
However, if you want to "prove" it, please do not come back with medical cites explaining how the liver works - (I think most of us understand that) and then claim that it IMPLIES we should not eat liver.
What I would like to see is a reputable medical text or journal EXPLICITLY saying that eating liver is dangerous. I know that some people claim that the potential accumulation of chemicals in older animals' livers might offset the nutrituional value of liver, but I've NEVER heard of a medical opinion that liver is actually dangerous to eat.
Ultimately, I don't really care - because I intend to keep eating liver. If you already do not eat liver, then it probably makes little difference to you either.
So please don't go out of your way or spend a lot of time.
If you prove liver is bad (or gross) - can I still eat blood sausage?