Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 5/13/2004 11:25:47 AM EDT
[#1]
In a close range guns fight in daytime conditions, I'd put my money on the Su-35 instead the F-22. That 35' has vectoring capability in ALL directions about 40-50 degrees from it's line of flight. The -22 can match in on that plane, but no 22 can pull off a J-turn, hook, etc.

The F-15 actually did have thrust vectoring technology at one point, but only for a lucky few Eagles. They were called Streak Eagles, probably used the USAF and NASA. They demonstrated some incredible manuvers - the original concept was to make it able to operate out of damaged runways, but the whole thing got a little out of hand.

I'll also support the statement that the F-4 was outclassed completely by the MiG-25 when it came to brute speed, operational ceiling, etc. But that is one reason the Shah of Iran took the Tomcat over the Eagle in 79'.


I say stick a pair of thrust vectoring nozzles into the Tom', and watch it kick some serious ass... Again...
Link Posted: 5/13/2004 11:34:11 AM EDT
[#2]
The Russian 'Stealth Technology' is so good we aren't aware it even exist's!

When we sold Israel the F4's we did not give them 'all' of our technology that our planes contained.
To do so may be suicide for us.

Russian Mig's are very agile and capable planes but our pilot's are the best!

BigDozer66
Link Posted: 5/13/2004 11:36:41 AM EDT
[#3]

The Russians still look down upon G-suits. I can't see the pilot wearing one on that vid.


Aerobatic pilots don't as a rule because the inflation and deflation of the suit iterferes with precise control movements needed when flying in formations and doing precision manuevers. Our Blue Angels pilots don't wear G-suits either. There's a great read on this (the blue angels) in this month's MotorCyclist magazine.

Dave
Link Posted: 5/13/2004 11:40:48 AM EDT
[#4]
BzzzzT!
WRONG!!


Quoted:
The F-15 actually did have thrust vectoring technology at one point, but only for a lucky few Eagles. They were called Streak Eagles, probably used the USAF and NASA. They demonstrated some incredible manuvers - the original concept was to make it able to operate out of damaged runways, but the whole thing got a little out of hand.




The Streak Eagle was a specially modified F-15A Eagle, it  was able to outclimb a Saturn V Moon Rocket to almost 60,000 feet.
This same aircraft flew to 98,430 feet (30,000 meters) in 207.80 seconds (less than 3 minutes and 30 seconds).

During the winter of 1974-75, McDonnell modified F-15A serial number 72-0119 in an attempt to set world time-to-climb records. The project was given the name Operation Streak Eagle. In an effort to save weight, all non-mission critical systems were deleted, including the flap and the speed brake, the armament, the radar, and the fire control system. The paint was even stripped off, leaving a bare metal aircraft. It weighed 1800 pounds less than the stock F-15A. The record attempts were carried out during the winter at Grand Forks AFB in North Dakota to take advantage of the cold temperatures. During the record attempts, only enough fuel was carried to make the specific flight and return to base. The aircraft broke eight existing time-to-climb records previously held by the F-4B and the MiG-25:

Altitude       Time         Date               Pilot
--------       ----         ----               -----
3,000 meters   27.57 sec   January 16, 1975   Maj. R. Smith
6,000 meters   39.33 sec   January 16, 1975   Maj W. R. Macfarlane
9,000 meters   48.86 sec   January 16, 1975   Maj W. R. Macfarlane
12,000 meters   59.38 sec   January 16, 1975   Maj W. R. Macfarlane
15,000 meters   77.02 sec   January 16, 1975   Maj D. W. Peterson
20,000 meters  122.94 sec   January 19, 1975   Maj R. Smith
25,000 meters  161.02 sec   January 26, 1975   Maj D. W. Peterson
30,000 meters  207.80 sec   February 1, 1975   Maj R. Smith

The Streak Eagle is now on outdoor display at the USAF Museum at Wright Patterson AFB at Dayton, Ohio. Most of these records were later broken by the Soviet "P-42", which was a prototype for the Sukhoi Su-27 interceptor.

McDonnell Douglas and NASA built the NF-15B "Agile Eagle"


On October 3, 1984, the Flight Dynamics Laboratory of the Air Force's Aeronatical Systems Division awarded a contract to McDonnell Douglas for an advanced development Short Take-Off and Landing (STOL) Maneuvering Technology Demonstrator (MTD) experimental aircraft. The basic idea behind the program was to develop an aircraft that could land and take off from sections of wet, bomb-damaged runway under bad-weather conditions and under severe crosswinds and without active ground-based navigational assistance. The first two-seat F-15B (serial number 71-290) was selected for modification as the STOL/MTD demonstrator. The project was given the name Agile Eagle.

For the first phase of the program, the F-15 STOL/MTD aircraft was fitted with movable canard aerodynamic surfaces attached to the upper edges of the forward air intakes. The canards were mounted at 20 degree dihedral and could be operated either symmetrically or differentially. It was provided with a four-channel fly-by-wire integrated flight/propulsion control (IFPC) system, and an improved set of cockpit controls and displays (similar to those intended for the F-15E). In addition, the aircraft was fitted with a beefed-up undercarriage capable of handling rough field landings at high descent speeds. The APG-70 radar of the F-15B was provided with a high-resolution ground-mapping mode to enable the pilot to locate the airfield from a great distance, and a LANTIRN set was fitted to the aircraft to project an image of the airfield onto the HUD during the final landing approach.

The integrated flight/propulsion control (IFPC) system was developed by McDonnell Douglas and produced by General Electric. The IFPC manages all control parameters for the aircraft. It uses a new computer chip and employs high-level computer languages such as Ada. The system is intended to relieve the pilot of some of the more routine tasks of handling the aircraft. There are five modes of operation--conventional, short takeoff/approach, short landing, cruise and combat. Position sensors linked to the throttle, control stick and rudder pedals feed electrical signals to the IFPC system, and the computer converts them into a set of commands to the quadruply-redundant fly-by-wire activators to set the controls for the maneuvers required.

The modified 71-0290 flew for the first time on September 7, 1988, company test pilot Larry Walker being at the controls The aircraft was assigned the designation NF-15B, the N meaning that the modifications were sufficiently drastic that the aircraft was not expected to be returned to its original configuration. 43 test flights were carried out in this configuration.

In the second phase of the program, the standard circular dilating engine nozzles were replaced with rectangular two-dimensional thrust-vectoring, thrust-reversing nozzles. These nozzles were built by Pratt & Whitney out of chemically-milled, welded titanium honeycomb. They had flat upper and lower flaps that were independently driven and capable of adjusting the exhaust upwards or downwards by angles as much as 20 degrees. There were a set of vanes above and below the nozzle that made it possible for the thrust to be reversed.

The first flight with the thrust-vectoring nozzles took place on May 16, 1989. The plane was transferred to Edwards AFB for joint flight tests by the Air Force and McDonnell Douglas. The two-dimensional nozzles were first tested in flight on March 23, 1990. Test flights demonstrated that the thrust-vectoring features of the new nozzles worked as anticipated and validated the changes that had been made to the IFPC system software in order to accommodate the new thrust-vectoring nozzles. It turned out that thrust-vectoring resulted in a 25 percent reduction in takeoff roll. The thrust-reversing feature made it possible for the F-15 to land on just 1650 feet of runway. In addition, it was found possible to use thrust reversal during actual flight to produce rapid decelerations, a useful feature to have during close-in air-to-air combat. During its flying life, the F-15 STOL/MTD made numerous vectored takeoffs with rotation demonstrated at speeds as low as 42 mph. The shortest landing made by the plane took only 1366 feet, with a basic F-15 needing 7500 feet to land.

The program ended on August 15, 1991, having accomplished all of its flight objectives. The vectored thrust nozzles were returned to Pratt & Whitney.

Following the completion of the vectored thrust tests, the NF-15B was fitted with new thrust-vectoring nozzles. They are known as pitch/yaw balanced beam nozzles, and can deflect thrust up to 20 degrees in any direction. F100-PW-229 IPE engines. The program is known as ACTIVE (Advanced Control Technology for Integrated VEhicles). The goal of the program is to explore thrust vectoring in the supersonic regime, as well as to explore the possibility of using thrust vectoring to replace vertical tailfins. Initial flight trials begain in February of 1996. The first thrust vectoring flights took place shortly thereafter. The first supersonic thrust vectoring took place on April 24, 1996. On October 31, 1996, the aircraft demonstrated thrust vectoring at Mach 1.95.

The NF-15B has now received a NASA number of 837.


Link Posted: 5/13/2004 11:41:02 AM EDT
[#5]
The TU4 wasnt a "carbon copy". But it was a close as they could get. They had to convert the plane to the metric system, and the russians could not make the cyclone engine. It was too complicated for thier manufaturing abilities.

I would take an Air Force F-22 anyday over a russian bird due to one thing: Training. We train better pilots than anyone. The pilot in the seat is more important that the aircraft under him

Aerobatic pilots do not wear G suits for this reason. They are expensive, complicated, and 12g turns take place for half a second. This is waaaay different than a Hornet pilot in a 400kt sustained 7g turn. Extremely fast G loads can be handled with training. Extremly long G loads need a G suit, preferably one of those new water filled ones
Link Posted: 5/13/2004 4:41:50 PM EDT
[#6]
Screw it what we really need are some of these!




Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Top Top