[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Bring back the old format? (Page 2 of 5)
|
It's like Obama care at this point. It sucks and everyone knows it sucks but there's too much work put into it for them to scrap it. |
|
Quoted:
The old was much easier for me to read, and fit more info on a screen. I don't know whey they wan't so much blank space. I also don't know why the new font sucks. OLD: http://i.imgur.com/209HFIp.jpg NEW: http://i.imgur.com/qIW3ujU.png OLD: http://i.imgur.com/sWB7d11.jpg NEW: http://i.imgur.com/OmFGq24.jpg |
|
Quoted:
The old was much easier for me to read, and fit more info on a screen. I don't know whey they wan't so much blank space. I also don't know why the new font sucks. OLD: http://i.imgur.com/209HFIp.jpg NEW: http://i.imgur.com/qIW3ujU.png OLD: http://i.imgur.com/sWB7d11.jpg NEW: http://i.imgur.com/OmFGq24.jpg This. I can sit on the other side of the room and still read the text on my monitor.
|
|
Quoted:
The old was much easier for me to read, and fit more info on a screen. I don't know whey they want so much blank space. I also don't know why the new font sucks. OLD: http://i.imgur.com/209HFIp.jpg NEW: http://i.imgur.com/qIW3ujU.png OLD: http://i.imgur.com/sWB7d11.jpg NEW: http://i.imgur.com/OmFGq24.jpg This, so much this. They new layout looks horrible, is hard to read like some crappy app. your layout is bad and you should feel bad. |
|
Quoted:
Everything just seems out of proportion compared to the old site I had that, then went into profile and changed font setting to "Default". After that, it was better, but everything still doesn't scale. If I zoom to make one thing look OK, I hork the rest, on pretty much anything. |
|
Quoted:
Goatboy said that's not happening. And I'd doubt they'd show weakness and go back on that
But the changes need some changes. I like some of the new options but the layout and overall look just feels cheap like a kid in high school made it for a class project |
Ugh this new site is horrendously bloated and slow. Seems like people are saying it works great on iPads and iPhones, but it is clearly not working so well on my PC. I was planning to obtain membership at the beginning of next year, but, why?
Ugh, and I hope they fix the issue where I click on "Reply" and it assumes I want a "New Topic" instead. I intentionally place the mouse on the "Reply" button, but it seems those two buttons in the top right are crossed somehow. I guess they are still working out the issues. |
|
Quoted:
I like some of the new options but the layout and overall look just feels cheap like a kid in high school made it for a class project It's like the website was built by harbor freight. Now I'm going to go back to page one so I can see the poll numbers because apparently that's a thing now. |
|
Give it a rest and learn to use the other 99% of your brain to adapt. Half or more of the members would die instantly if there were an active form of intellectual Darwinism that caused death for people who can't function if you move a menu button or change a table color.
The old site isn't coming back. This one is better in every way and will continue to get better as they run through change/fix iterations. In 3 months no one will care and in six everyone will like it. That's the general rule of software development. |
|
Quoted:
if you approved of this botched abortion of a site "upgrade" you deserve to be banned. Tablets now outnumber PC's. It is 2016. A whole lot has happened since 1996. And two different site's code bases to maintain is stupid. No other word for it. If I can handle this change at the pleasant age of 61, then you can handle it too. |







WHY!???!?!?!?