User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 2:21:47 AM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The great state of California produced this tard |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 2:23:22 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryWe should all spam her with letters demanding her resignation for violating her oath of office. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 2:24:55 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
 Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Nice quote... from two DECADES ago... Nice try, NeverTrumper  
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 2:31:33 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Never pass the senate. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 2:36:51 AM EDT
[#5]
CUNT!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 2:38:00 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
CUNT! |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 2:40:07 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Bay Area Bitch... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 2:40:45 AM EDT
[#8]
Fuck you bitch. Ban em and burn.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 2:41:46 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: By name, that is sure easy to avoid... I'm going to just name my AR "Fred"... |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 2:48:21 AM EDT
[#10]
The senate needs something like 4chan where if you make the same post (or in this case propose the same bill) too many times it auto bans you for spam
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 2:55:55 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No, they have it worded like this on purpose. Existing guns are grandfathered, so many say, "Hey I get to keep mine, so it's not that bad". But, they can not be transferred and when the owner dies they must be turned in for destruction. So in a relatively short amount of time, they are all removed. Simple. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 2:57:42 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I cannot comply. I will pop a bottle of champagne when she fucking dies. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 2:58:22 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Uh Oh! @Aimless ain't gonna like that! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:08:12 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Kamala Harris, Newsome, Pelosi and Feinstein.... all San Francisco 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:19:48 AM EDT
[#15]
When does the panic buying start...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:23:07 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Nobody likes my idea to name rifles “the Pelosi” “The Feinstein” “the Schumer” I think it would be hilarious to make them demand a ban of their own name |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:29:58 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Duracoat had the bright colored line called the Bloomberg collection. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:31:00 AM EDT
[#18]
lol
Not complying with that either. Fuck you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:31:54 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Good, this should re-energize our base and put the fear of non re-election into the Rino’s. Time to back on the offensive. Use this issue to split of th3 red dog Democrats. 18Z50....time to establish the G base and begin the confidence patrols of the new generation of gun owners! |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:32:23 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I want her to live long enough to see the Trump-packed scotus fuck gun control raw. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:34:00 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You are aware of his SCOTUS pics, right?  Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: Why would you think Trump would "fuck gun control raw" Cuz MAGA.....naw, he made it clear with the bump stock ban where he stands Change my mind. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:35:11 AM EDT
[#22]
Fucking WW2 technology SKS on there but no O or N Pap or did I miss that?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:35:21 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't think that there is any fear of non re-election for the Rino's. What are the other WINNABLE options for the right? Vote Dem to "show them"? Vote 3rd party and effectively give the election away with all of the new purple states according to this last election? We need to find away to light a new or different kind of fire. I don't know that that is but I think they know that we can not afford to risk either voting for or voting in a manor that results in a Democrat win. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Good, this should re-energize our base and put the fear of non re-election into the Rino’s. Time to back on the offensive. Use this issue to split of th3 red dog Democrats. 18Z50....time to establish the G base and begin the confidence patrols of the new generation of gun owners! What are the other WINNABLE options for the right? Vote Dem to "show them"? Vote 3rd party and effectively give the election away with all of the new purple states according to this last election? We need to find away to light a new or different kind of fire. I don't know that that is but I think they know that we can not afford to risk either voting for or voting in a manor that results in a Democrat win. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:36:21 AM EDT
[#24]
Well they are sure continuing to work very hard to build a very large army of partisans.
No compliance from this sector. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:37:18 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
In 20 years he did what? Added bump stock ban to his list of things he supports? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: Nice quote... from two DECADES ago... Nice try, NeverTrumper |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:37:35 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Two more John Roberts style conservatives. Change my mind. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:37:55 AM EDT
[#27]
Ain't gonna be any AWB. It's just grandstanding and a good way to waste their time and our money.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:39:34 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
one good thing about democrats in control of one house, the republicans make it appear like they fight like hell when they can't exercise real power to keep drawing a check. when republicans are in control, they fuck us. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:39:57 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Gorsuch? I see the doubts about Kavanaugh in GD but I haven’t seen much negativity on Gorsuch in threads Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: Two more John Roberts style conservatives. Change my mind. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:40:19 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Obama had a 60 vote Senate and majority in the house fir 2 years. No AWB then. Feinstein filed it too. Every year. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Yeah, until we lose that in 2020. HPA and reciprocity didn't. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:40:56 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Sometimes I wonder why they even bother TBH
If you don't like our Constitution why not try to push your BS somewhere else where it would be easier, and leave this fine country alone
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:41:52 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Time will tell I suppose but I don’t expect SCOTUS to hear any 2A cases in the next decade. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:45:05 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Would you drop your nonsense already? You post this garbage every chance you get. The wall is being built, and has been under construction for months now. Completely new sections in many places where there was NO wall to begin with. It's all being built from prefab steel panels lifted in place by track-hoe. Concreted in place. There's drone footage of it under construction on Youtube. OR, you know, just keep trying to make what you think are clever retorts online while accomplishing and contributing absolutely nothing to society except for your ridiculous opinions... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:47:02 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Gorsuch? I see the doubts about Kavanaugh in GD but I haven’t seen much negativity on Gorsuch in threads Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: Two more John Roberts style conservatives. Change my mind. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:48:19 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's literally a picture from Trump's Twitter account with a dinosaur added.
https://i.imgur.com/T33sSIO.png Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: Would you drop your nonsense already? You post this garbage every chance you get. The wall is being built, and has been under construction for months now. Completely new sections in many places where there was NO wall to begin with. It's all being built from prefab steel panels lifted in place by track-hoe. Concreted in place. There's drone footage of it under construction on Youtube. OR, you know, just keep trying to make what you think are clever retorts online while accomplishing and contributing absolutely nothing to society except for your ridiculous opinions...
https://i.imgur.com/T33sSIO.png |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:49:29 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Gorsuch? I see the doubts about Kavanaugh in GD but I haven't seen much negativity on Gorsuch in threads Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: Two more John Roberts style conservatives. Change my mind. The rumor was that Kennedy was the hold up and one of the main reasons 2A jurisprudence basically stopped dead in its tracks after Heller and McDonald. Stevens all but confirmed this rumor to be true and that would explain why the court has been reluctant to take 2A cases. With Kennedy's departure I am cautiously optimistic. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:50:34 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I want her to live long enough to see the Trump-packed scotus fuck gun control raw. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:55:45 AM EDT
[#38]
I would wish she would have a heart attack already.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 3:58:52 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Time will tell I suppose but I don’t expect SCOTUS to hear any 2A cases in the next decade. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Two more John Roberts style conservatives. Change my mind. If Idiocracy had been a book written in 1789, it would have a scene where modern folks described how they were looking to the judiciary as saviors of the Second Amendment. [note: no criticism of quoted posters intended, only quoted for context] |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 4:07:50 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Gorsuch is solid on 2A issues and is far from a "John Roberts style conservative." Kavanaugh looks good on 2A issues but we will find out if he is solid really soon. Roberts has been solid on 2A issues on the 2A cases SCOTUS has taken. The rumor was that Kennedy was the hold up and one of the main reasons 2A jurisprudence basically stopped dead in its tracks after Heller and McDonald. Stevens all but confirmed this rumor to be true and that would explain why the court has been reluctant to take 2A cases. With Kennedy's departure I am cautiously optimistic. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 4:13:47 AM EDT
[#41]
Groundhog Day!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 4:16:36 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
None of these "conservative" guys have a record on guns, because non-lib districts don't generate many lib gun laws to challenge. Lib lawschools don't generate many non-lib lawyers, either. Deck is heavily stacked, so even K's lip service to us is encouraging. Time will tell if he's more than another Fudd. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 4:22:04 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I know she does this every session but still  |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 4:22:35 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I know she does this every session but still After 2020, we could have a problem. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 4:22:45 AM EDT
[#45]
How does the Speaker of the House introduce legislation in the Senate?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 4:24:36 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
When does the panic buying start... 
Everyone is already sold out of everything, but I have some pmags I'll let you have for 50 each. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 4:24:45 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You are aware of his SCOTUS pics, right? I fully expect if the USSC hears any of these cases we talk about, they will probably go anti gun. I hope I am wrong, but thats just how I see it. Maybe if Trump gets two more justices, then possibly we'd be OK. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 4:26:33 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Sounds like they're planning a grandfather clause, but without the ability to sell or bequeath to anyone. Is that even legal? What, are your kids just supposed to turn everything in for shredding after you die? Shit, if that's what's going down the panic is going to get real this time. I don't find it legal under my view of the second amendment, but under current precedent its completely legal. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 4:28:17 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How does the Speaker of the House introduce legislation in the Senate?
Feinswine is in the Senate..... Pillosi is the Speaker of the House |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/10/2019 4:28:59 AM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Legal shit is way out of my lane. I can read and I have some common sense but I mostly lurk in the RBG or SCOTUS threads. I still haven't finished reading the "no new 2A cases prove me wrong thread" so I just read what the general consensus is or what Nolo and company post. I really feel like 2A has gotten the shit end of the stick for too long but don't want to spread much defeatism or negativity in the threads so I keep shit to myself 90% of the time. I pray your opportunism is warranted. The state level gun control in too many blue states has gone full retard and I don't want to see Virginia, Colorado, Nevada or Florida become like California If Kennedy was the weak link, and Stevens all but said he was, then it makes sense if one or more jurists were trying to keep 2A cases away from SCOTUS for fear they could go the wrong way (it's better to have horrible lower court opinions stand than bad SCOTUS dicta). Alito, Thomas, and Scalia (now Gorsuch) are solid on 2A issues and it takes four votes at conference to hear a case so that means either Roberts or Kennedy were spiking cases (my guess is Roberts and/or possibly others spiked cases they thought Kennedy would taint). If Roberts or Kavanaugh, or both, are wishy-washy on 2A issues, then we will get more of the same and the lower courts will continue to dismantle the 2A. The problem I have is Roberts has a history on 2A cases and it's pretty strong. Likewise Kavanaugh has a record at the lower level and he seems pretty strong. He's not Sammy "Machine gun" Alito, Thomas, or Scalia strong but he's strong enough to get rid of some pretty bad things. So just from a cursory view, we're looking pretty good so I don't get the defeatism I see here. On top of that, Kennedy just retired and Kavanaugh was only just seated so we now get to see what's going to happen. SCOTUS has already denied cert to at least one 2A case but that wasn't a strong case (for a lot of reasons). TL;DR: we're going to find out really soon where we stand. Again, I am cautiously optimistic. |
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
