User Panel
So, would you hit it? |
|
|
Just tell her, "Gee whiz, sweetie, if your brain worked as well as your uterus, they'd want that, too!" |
|
|
And it's someone else's body that she's having scraped out of hers before it's ready to go. What she does with her body is fine, but when she starts affecting the body of someone else, that's where it becomes problematic. |
|
|
Damn good argument there!
In other words, worry about the people inside your church/religion and leave the ones outside of it to God. It's none of your business. |
|||
|
My wife started on me about that last night.
I reiterated to her that I #1 believe that abortion is murder #2 vote solely on gun rights #3 can't believe she goes to a Catholic Church and believes women should be able to murder babies Luckily I have a comfortable couch. |
|
All you pro-choicers/pro-babymurder will probably burn in hell with all the rest of the people that use abortion for birthcontrol. All it takes for evil to prevail, is for good men to do nothing. So you know abortion is wrong and yet you do nothing, and really dont care?
A baby in the womb is a seprate life....you dont own it, so how can you justifiy killing it? |
|
Damn! And the popcorn is ready! |
|||||
|
I dislike Theocracies only a little less than I like the wanton murder of babies. |
|
|
Agreed. |
||||||||
|
Abortion is a good thing, one of the few things governments should do is to pay for abortions. Evil is bringing baby after baby into an uncaring world, leavingit to it's own devices, then punishing it when it breaks one of your rules. |
|
|
Better to kill it before it can? Before it can do anything? Hell, we worry more about treating a convicted murderer properly! |
||
|
So why dont you go to Africa and murder all the kids there that dont have it so good? Im sure youll enjoy that alot, knowing that your doing a good thing. Sick fuck. |
|
|
<lol>, no need, they are doing an admirable job of wiping themselves out. Give them 10 years and you won't have anything to worry about on the african continent. |
||
|
The lowest little child in Africa is a better person than you. Your eagerness to murded children puts you at about the level of Jeffery dommer if not lower. |
|
|
You smooth talker. |
|
|
Guess you think we should do something about homosexuals too? Am I the only one here that follows the Christian religion that understands 1 Cor. 5? |
|
|
Ok, but personally, the "lowest little child" in africa ain't here, and isn't eating my lunch, so we will never know. <lol>. |
||
|
Eternal Damnation! Double Tap! I am doing it for the chilluns!
|
|
The last shall be first. You take joy in the thought of children being murdered? Your one sick person. I dont know if your mentally ill, or just evil, but you need help in one form or another. |
|
|
1 Corinthians 5 Expel the Immoral Brother! 1 It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that does not occur even among pagans: A man has his father's wife. 2 And you are proud! Shouldn't you rather have been filled with grief and have put out of your fellowship the man who did this? 3 Even though I am not physically present, I am with you in spirit. And I have already passed judgment on the one who did this, just as if I were present. 4 When you are assembled in the name of our Lord Jesus and I am with you in spirit, and the power of our Lord Jesus is present, 5 hand this man over to Satan, so that the sinful nature[1] may be destroyed and his spirit saved on the day of the Lord. 6 Your boasting is not good. Don't you know that a little yeast works through the whole batch of dough? 7 Get rid of the old yeast that you may be a new batch without yeast--as you really are. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. 8 Therefore let us keep the Festival, not with the old yeast, the yeast of malice and wickedness, but with bread without yeast, the bread of sincerity and truth. 9 I have written you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people-- 10 not at all meaning the people of this world who are immoral, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters. In that case you would have to leave this world. 11 But now I am writing you that you must not associate with anyone who calls himself a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or a slanderer, a drunkard or a swindler. With such a man do not even eat. 12 What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? 13 God will judge those outside. "Expel the wicked man from among you."[2] Footnotes 5:5 Or that his body; or that the flesh 5:13 Deut. 17:7; 19:19; 21:21; 22:21,24; 24:7 Seems pretty clear to me. Not that I would like to see the slaughter of innocents to go on of course. |
||
|
Abortion is already illegal, why aren't we enforcing the laws?
No one shall be deprived of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. |
|
And your a doctor also? I thought you were just a bad speller! |
||
|
No one shall be deprived of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, unless that person happens to be a woman, who is carrying a fetus she does not want. Hey, sounds reasonable... (to someone, maybe...) |
|
|
All you have referenced with Deut. concerns people with the religion of Judaism or living in the land ruled by the Hebrews. No where does it say anything making the rest of the world obey there laws. It only concerns what their laws are in their lands. 1 Cor. 5 says don't concern yourself with people outside the church but judge the people in the church and punish them accordingly, e.g., kick them out. |
|||
|
News to me. |
|
|
Dude .... that is WAY screwed up. Infant is being deprived of life. Woman ALREADY pursued "happiness." Hopefully she had an orgasm. Futher, she is NOT guaranteed happiness - only the pursuit of it. She had her pursuit, now its time to live with the consequences. If happiness were jumping off a cliff for her, she DOES NOT get to suspend the laws of gravity. |
|
|
For the record - NO WAY I Cor 5, or ANY Scripture could be used to say Christians should NOT preach thetruth to ALL men - inside or outside the church. We agree, right?? |
|
|
So her freedom to pursue (not having pursued, but pursue) happiness is dependant on what you think, as opposed to what she thinks? |
||
|
Dude, I am on your side. I didn't write the cross references, I just pasted them out of an online Bible. I didn't bother to look them up. Sorry!!! And I agree with Garandman. Just because they know not the Christian God doesn't mean that we shouldn't try to educate them does it? Be a light in the world and all that? |
||||
|
No. Now pay attention, cuz what I am about to tell you is the ENTIRE basis of our legal system, and even preceeding that, tge English Common Law our legal system originated from. YOu payin' attention??? She has the right to PURSUE happiness UNTIL she deprives someone else of life. She screwed. She doesn't get to deprive another of Constitutionalyl guaranteed RIGHT to life in order to continue her pursuit of happiness. "The right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins..." - Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes This has NOTHIGN to do with my opinion. This has to do with the rule of law, and a legal system that provides EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW. Its what makes your rights of equal import to everyone elses. What you have just read SHOULD be enuf for you to change you opinion, and shun abortion. Somehow I doubt you will. But you could surprise me... |
|
|
That's not the argument. The argument is do we have the right to force them to believe and obey it. I see nothing wrong with preaching the truth to anyone. However, when they reject it or tell you they don't want to hear it, leave them alone and let God judge them the way he sees fit. Matthew 10:14 -"And whoever will not receive nor hear your words, when you depart from that house or city, shake off the dust from your feet." |
||
|
Ooops! Took it the wrong way. No need for you to say sorry. My bad! |
|||||
|
No problem! |
||||||
|
From a legal point of view, Can you get a Social Security Number for a fetus? Can you claim it as a dependent on your taxes? If not, I don't think you use the legality argument. |
||
|
Sorry, but as a fetus is not a human yet, it does not enjoy the same legal protections as you and I. As abortion is perfectly legal, no one is being harmed. Simple, and I didn't have to talk down to you either. |
||
|
Exactly! |
|||
|
You aren't seriously using the IRS code and Soc Secuity laws, all of which came about in the last 100 years, to attempt to define the Bill of Rights, US Constitution, and Declaration of Independence, all of which are over 200 years old, are you?? If the Congress passes a law that says gun owners have to pay a $5,000 year tax to own guns, you are not then gonna define 2A in that context are you?? I'm speaking of natural law as represented in English Common law initially , and then our Founding Docs. IRS / Soc Sec need to brought in compliance with the Constitution et al, not the other way around. |
|
|
I talk down to you as a post such as this shows ABYSMAL ignorance of natural law as recognized by our Constitution. Then take your statement " As abortion is perfectly legal, no one is being harmed" Substitute "murder" or "rape" for abortion. Does the fact that something is "legal" make it not harmful?? Dude.... |
|
|
Actually, it was a serious question. Really not sure if you can do that or not. My point being is that the government does not recognize the fetus as a human capable of Life, Liberty or the Pursuit of Happiness. If the government doesn't recognize that, I don't see the connection with "the ENTIRE basis of our legal system," argument. |
||
|
As I mentioned earlier, murder, or rape, of a human that is outside the womb is a different matter all together. I'm in no danger of being murdered, or raped, as a fetus. Again, do I think it's wrong? Yes. Do I have the right to make a woman do something she doesn't want to do because she doesn't believe what I do? No. If it's our God's law, then let him deal with the person that has the abortion. If they don't want to listen to me there's nothing I can do to stop it even if a law was passed to prohibit it. It's her body and she's going to do with it what she pleases. Nothing you can do about it short of putting a gun to her head and threatening not only her life but the fetus also. Doesn't make sense. Gotta run. Be back later tonight or tomorrow. |
||
|
You mean like when our laws indicated blacks are 3/5 of a person?? Or when they were barred from owning firearms?? The fact that something is codified as law DOES NOT mean its Constitutional. That our legal system does not recognize the life, liberty and pursuit of happiness of the preborn is a FLAW in the law. The basis of our law (natural law, as recognized in English common law, and then our Founding docuemnts) remains firm. In fact, we HAVE made progress in this area. Scott Peterson IS being prosecuted for TWO murders - the mother AND the unborn child. |
|
|
I seem to remember a similar version of this statement to read: 'Actually, it was a serious question. Really not sure if you can do that or not. My point being is that the government does not recognize the BLACK MAN as a human capable of Life, Liberty or the Pursuit of Happiness. If the government doesn't recognize that, I don't see the connection with "the ENTIRE basis of our legal system," argument.' I don't use the Government as a reliable judge of what is and is not a human being. If you prefer to be led... good for you. -LS |
|
|
|
No, you do not. If you did, you would know life begins at conception. |
|||
|
The Scott Peterson defense agrees with you. However the law does NOT. |
|
|
"All The Republicans Want Is My Uterus" - yes, I heard they go well with fava beans and a fine Chianti.
|
|
I agree with this, however the brooding masses have many an unwanted birth. That being said what ever is not "flushed" is our next generation of welfare needing, potentially to be incarcerated and certainly to be medicated indigenous species - all of which the taxpaying public will carry the burden of.... |
|
|
Hmmm, During the founding fathers time and for many thousands of years before them, there has always been abortion, as well as being legal (just a herb after all), it was relatively safe. Only people against were the christian church types. And even then, they were often the users of those same herbs. I gather it all depends on whose ox is being gored at the time as to who shoudl have a right and who shouldn't. |
||
|
It may or may not, depending on who is beining murdered or raped. Also, Murder, being a legal term takes this out of your actual purview, as you are trying to argue this on a theological arguement. Murder by it's legal nature is against the law. Rape? Would you think forcing a woman to carry someones seed, against her will could be considered rape? |
||
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.