I call BS too.
When a magazine tests a bike like one of the current Speed kings (of which Honda doesn't run with) like a Hayabuse or ZX-12R, they do it by folding mirrors back, messing with tire pressures, lowering the bike etc. The best top speeds you will find are in the 184mph range, and that's all they will do, down hill with a gale force wind at sea level on the right temperature day etc. etc. This has been the case for several years as the Japanese manufacturers were threatened with EU sanctions if they didn't control the power wars. The straw that broke the camel's back was an ad on German TV where a Hayabusa blows past a BMW who has it flat out at 155mph. The germans threw a tissy and got together with the other Surrender Monkeys and laid it all out. This is not a new thing, despite rumors that Euro-spec bikes are faster, most of them are not. France for instance has a 100hp limit on their bikes, the Hayabuse makes about 166, stock.
Why I call BS: It's not hard to get a sport bike to do 175mph on a long road with 135-150hp at the back wheel. With a more purpose-built-for-speed bike like a Hayabusa you'll manage to hit low 190's. To get ANY sport bike to break 200 mph reliably, you'll have to have HUGE horsepower to overcome the drag. Despite their curvy shape, there is NOTHING aerodynamic about a motorcycle, and that's before you drop a rider on top of it. The horsepower requirement goes up exponentially to speed. Breaking 200mph with all we have available today is still a major achievement. Most guys do it with a turbo kit, and the resulting animals are so far removed from the host bike that you really couldn't call it a Honda or Suzuki etc.
So, yeah. Unless this is a $30,000 hand grenade, it won't do 200mph.
Dave