User Panel
Posted: 9/7/2018 12:38:27 PM EDT
Finally stepped up and have one on the way, now I'm working on the rest of the bits and pieces and would like to pick up a decent IR laser without breaking the bank. While I understand "buy once, cry once", a MAWL simply isn't in the budget at the moment and even if it were, I'm not sure I need that level of performance.
The OTAL-C IR seems to be have solid reviews and with it being in the $300-$400 range, is entirely doable. I doubt I'm going to do much out past 200-300 yards, and from what I've seen, the OTAL-C should handle those distances without any issues. It looks like they are out of stock pretty much everywhere right now. Anyone know if these are released in "batches" and this is just a lull between productions? Is there a revised version about to drop that I should wait for? Any input or recommendations? Thanks! |
|
Steiner gets behind on stuff like this, very common occurrence. This dry spot in OTALs has lasted a little longer than normal however.
Great unit, very basic but works well. Put battery in, remove lens cover, push pad to activate. No way to accidentally hit the visible laser- there is none. Something to think about in regards to ND's of light/laser at the wrong time. As always the answer is training, but you may be under stress, have not trained with your gear as much as you should have, or it might be in use by a family member that isn't the super trooper you may be. Also, AA battery which is more common than CR123s In short, lots of reasons to like the OTAL-C |
|
Like to point out...In a few months many will see something that will be HUGELY cost effective and serve the needs of the IR community. More to come.....
|
|
Quoted:
Like to point out...In a few months many will see something that will be HUGELY cost effective and serve the needs of the IR community. More to come..... View Quote I've liked my OTAL-C so far. I eventually want to get a better unit down the road - but it has served its use so far. |
|
|
Quoted:
interested in hearing more.... big improvement over the OTAL-C? I've liked my OTAL-C so far. I eventually want to get a better unit down the road - but it has served its use so far. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Like to point out...In a few months many will see something that will be HUGELY cost effective and serve the needs of the IR community. More to come..... I've liked my OTAL-C so far. I eventually want to get a better unit down the road - but it has served its use so far. |
|
|
Quoted:
Steiner gets behind on stuff like this, very common occurrence. This dry spot in OTALs has lasted a little longer than normal however. Great unit, very basic but works well. Put battery in, remove lens cover, push pad to activate. No way to accidentally hit the visible laser- there is none. Something to think about in regards to ND's of light/laser at the wrong time. As always the answer is training, but you may be under stress, have not trained with your gear as much as you should have, or it might be in use by a family member that isn't the super trooper you may be. Also, AA battery which is more common than CR123s In short, lots of reasons to like the OTAL-C View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Steiner gets behind on stuff like this, very common occurrence. This dry spot in OTALs has lasted a little longer than normal however. Great unit, very basic but works well. Put battery in, remove lens cover, push pad to activate. No way to accidentally hit the visible laser- there is none. Something to think about in regards to ND's of light/laser at the wrong time. As always the answer is training, but you may be under stress, have not trained with your gear as much as you should have, or it might be in use by a family member that isn't the super trooper you may be. Also, AA battery which is more common than CR123s In short, lots of reasons to like the OTAL-C Thanks! Quoted:
Like to point out...In a few months many will see something that will be HUGELY cost effective and serve the needs of the IR community. More to come..... |
|
|
|
I just bought a Streamlight 69166. IR illuminator and IR laser. Just played with it a little bit so far but it ought to be fine for what I want it for. I am going to put it on my suppressed 15-22 SBR.
Anyone tried one of these? |
|
Quoted:
I just bought a Streamlight 69166. IR illuminator and IR laser. Just played with it a little bit so far but it ought to be fine for what I want it for. I am going to put it on my suppressed 15-22 SBR. Anyone tried one of these? View Quote |
|
|
I ran an OTAL for a couple of years, and then ponied up the money for the single spectrum DBAL i2. It was REALLY nice having the illuminator and laser activated by the same button. I still have it on my primary 5.56 gun, but my hunting rig now wears a DBAL D2 which is just absolutely fantastic. The slaved visible laser makes sighting in a breeze, and the illuminator on the D2 runs circles around the illuminator on the i2.
All that being said, the OTAL is a fine piece of gear. |
|
IMHO a D2 is the best bang for your buck at the moment. Used I've seen them for as low as 850. It has the same reach as the MAWL C1+. The main difference is the MAWL has faster switching between near and far illuminator and the illuminator is laser based. If that's worth 1,650.00 more go for it. The OTAL-C is a great unit but the lack of an illuminator is not an option IMHO. I paired my OTAL with a SureFire M622V and run tape switches at 12:00 and 3:00 on a thin profile rail. It allows me to activate either simultaneously or independently. The M622V has both IR and white light with a twist of the head. For hunting it works ok, but if you need white light in a hurry then you may want a different alternative or run a separate white light or illuminatior.
|
|
Quoted: It looks like they are out of stock pretty much everywhere right now. Anyone know if these are released in "batches" and this is just a lull between productions? View Quote |
|
I have a few of these lasers (OTALs). My 2 cents;
- Lack of a visible laser isn't a big deal as long as you have a NV compatible red dot to use along with it. Zero the dot during the day, adjust laser to match the dot at night while pointing at something ~500-800 yards away. The laser adjustments are somewhat coarse, so dot/laser convergence as far as you can see them and a perfect parallel zero are typically the exact same adjustment. - I prefer laser units with a visible laser for really short SBRs; you can ditch irons altogether and use the visible laser as a backup, or use something like the Railscales LEAF. This saves valuable space. - Switches for illumination are the big problem for the OTAL-C. The effective ways to fix this tend to be expensive (Steiner lights with IR capability + OEM Y-cables, dual lead switches with Surefire IR lights, etc) which sort of negates the point of having a less expensive IR laser in the first place. This is important because the IR pointer is visible for hundreds of yards (minimum), but you can have trouble spotting a target even as close as 50 yards. Hard to aim at stuff you can't see, especially when the OTAL-C doesn't have a "low" setting for the pointer. Illumination helps keep the laser dot from blooming. ... - If you can hold out to see what TNVC is hinting at (I have no idea what it is), it's possible to take an NV compatible red dot and an IR LED light and be good to go for recreational shooting immediately - just sight through the red dot and use the IR light for illumination with whatever switch/tailcap works for you. It's not ideal for some uses but it most certainly works. |
|
|
Thanks for all the recommendations and info - I really appreciate it. Still not exactly sure if I want to jump on an OTAL-C, spring for a DBAL, or wait and see what shows up in the next couple of months, but it sounds like none of those options would be a mistake.
I will need some type of illumination as well, so that's something else to consider. Thanks again! |
|
I am not much of a fan of lasers for long distance hunting shots.
Around here, the biggest critter I would ordinarily shoot is a coyote, and I don't get a kick out of wounding them. My Steiner and Laser Devices DBAL lasers diverge to a few inches in 100 yards or so. Fairly round dots about 3" across. At 200 or 300 yards the beam would be much larger than the quick kill zone, and at those distances with a 1X PVS-14 I know that I would, at best, be able to see only that the dot and the coyote were pretty close to each other. Not good enough for me. So, for precision shots, I aim through the EOTech and use that nice, precise, 1 mil dot. Sometimes, looking through the EOTech dims the view enough that I want a little illumination boost. Else, if I am in a stand, I might put the magnifier on my helmet mounted PVS-14 so I can see the laser dot and target with far better definition. I have decided to use laser aiming pretty much only for close engagements and fast action engagements (Pretty much just at ranges where I could use the red laser on my snub-nosed revolver). I do all my other shooting through the EOTech. Using extra powerful illumination to help reduce laser blooming never appealed to me. I see the comments suggesting it all the time. To my way of thinking, if you need illumination to see the target, you need illumination. But if you need to reduce laser glare/blooming/"splash", then you need a $15 neutral density filter (or two) for the laser. If you need both, you are out-driving your headlights and need to reassess your NV sighting equipment needs. Night vision is cool. Lasers are cool. But when being covert is not critical clear through until after the shooting is over with, many of my most challenging night shots on animals have been much better and more wisely solved with an accurate scoped rifle and a spotlight. There's no nice way to say it in the NV Forum, but it's a fact, that where amplified IR NV is concerned, even the best gear won't match what your eyeballs can do if you toss in adequate visible light, and the best IR converting magnified scopes are no match for standard optical rifle scopes in terms of available features and flexibility. Thermal, of course, tosses in a whole new layer of magic, but presents problems of its own. Using visible light for the shot can certainly be far more efficient if you have NV or thermal to first locate the critter and know just where to light it up. I have thermal, standard NV, and visible light shooting gear and a few kinds of experience with them all. Just one man's considered opinions. I know and have read many opinions in opposition. Choose from any you like, that's what we do. |
|
I ordered an OTAL-C around March. When I got it the adjustment caps were switched...ie...The "up/down" label was actually on the "left/right" knob. Confused the hell out of me for a while! Sent to Steiner and they fixed it up no hassle.
The unit is small, lightweight and perfect for just that....A small, lightweight IR laser. That said, its not nearly as bright as I would like. I've seen mention of 500 yards here....Not with my unit you damn sure wouldnt. Much past 100 and its very, very faint. I'm wanting to try a different IR unit simply because this one is so anemic. |
|
Quoted:
I ordered an OTAL-C around March. When I got it the adjustment caps were switched...ie...The "up/down" label was actually on the "left/right" knob. Confused the hell out of me for a while! Sent to Steiner and they fixed it up no hassle. The unit is small, lightweight and perfect for just that....A small, lightweight IR laser. That said, its not nearly as bright as I would like. I've seen mention of 500 yards here....Not with my unit you damn sure wouldnt. Much past 100 and its very, very faint. I'm wanting to try a different IR unit simply because this one is so anemic. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
I ordered an OTAL-C around March. When I got it the adjustment caps were switched...ie...The "up/down" label was actually on the "left/right" knob. Confused the hell out of me for a while! Sent to Steiner and they fixed it up no hassle. The unit is small, lightweight and perfect for just that....A small, lightweight IR laser. That said, its not nearly as bright as I would like. I've seen mention of 500 yards here....Not with my unit you damn sure wouldnt. Much past 100 and its very, very faint. I'm wanting to try a different IR unit simply because this one is so anemic. View Quote My poor-mans solution is using an OTAL-C along with a Vampire light. Both switches are on a vertical grip. I can chose laser, IR illumination, or both. I practice while out walking trails at night and it works (for me). |
|
Quoted:
Like to point out...In a few months many will see something that will be HUGELY cost effective and serve the needs of the IR community. More to come..... View Quote By the way, I like the idea of the new Night Optics device https://www.nightoptics.com/product/NC50.htm I’ll have to break down and grab one soon. |
|
Quoted:
Like to point out...In a few months many will see something that will be HUGELY cost effective and serve the needs of the IR community. More to come..... View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I am not much of a fan of lasers for long distance hunting shots. Around here, the biggest critter I would ordinarily shoot is a coyote, and I don't get a kick out of wounding them. My Steiner and Laser Devices DBAL lasers diverge to a few inches in 100 yards or so. Fairly round dots about 3" across. At 200 or 300 yards the beam would be much larger than the quick kill zone, and at those distances with a 1X PVS-14 I know that I would, at best, be able to see only that the dot and the coyote were pretty close to each other. Not good enough for me. So, for precision shots, I aim through the EOTech and use that nice, precise, 1 mil dot. Sometimes, looking through the EOTech dims the view enough that I want a little illumination boost. Else, if I am in a stand, I might put the magnifier on my helmet mounted PVS-14 so I can see the laser dot and target with far better definition. I have decided to use laser aiming pretty much only for close engagements and fast action engagements (Pretty much just at ranges where I could use the red laser on my snub-nosed revolver). I do all my other shooting through the EOTech. Using extra powerful illumination to help reduce laser blooming never appealed to me. I see the comments suggesting it all the time. To my way of thinking, if you need illumination to see the target, you need illumination. But if you need to reduce laser glare/blooming/"splash", then you need a $15 neutral density filter (or two) for the laser. If you need both, you are out-driving your headlights and need to reassess your NV sighting equipment needs. Night vision is cool. Lasers are cool. But when being covert is not critical clear through until after the shooting is over with, many of my most challenging night shots on animals have been much better and more wisely solved with an accurate scoped rifle and a spotlight. There's no nice way to say it in the NV Forum, but it's a fact, that where amplified IR NV is concerned, even the best gear won't match what your eyeballs can do if you toss in adequate visible light, and the best IR converting magnified scopes are no match for standard optical rifle scopes in terms of available features and flexibility. Thermal, of course, tosses in a whole new layer of magic, but presents problems of its own. Using visible light for the shot can certainly be far more efficient if you have NV or thermal to first locate the critter and know just where to light it up. I have thermal, standard NV, and visible light shooting gear and a few kinds of experience with them all. Just one man's considered opinions. I know and have read many opinions in opposition. Choose from any you like, that's what we do. View Quote My D740 is far and away the clearest NOD I own, probably due to the 100mm objective lens. It’s awesome enough that I’ve seriously considered selling my Flir 640 50mm Thermal to partially fund some Binos. ETA: there is a Gen 3 SIMRAD NOD clipon in the EE for $1650. Yeah, it’s a pig, but it’s a pig because the lens is massive. |
|
|
Yeah this? Any news?
|
|
ITS NOVEMBER! @TNVC
|
|
Quoted:
https://media3.giphy.com/media/KBx7fQoLxuV7G/giphy.gif By the way, I like the idea of the new Night Optics device https://www.nightoptics.com/product/NC50.htm I’ll have to break down and grab one soon. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Holy shit that's awesome. Fit and finish from the picture looks like LDI quality....... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
https://media3.giphy.com/media/KBx7fQoLxuV7G/giphy.gif By the way, I like the idea of the new Night Optics device https://www.nightoptics.com/product/NC50.htm I’ll have to break down and grab one soon. |
|
|
Quoted:
Like to point out...In a few months many will see something that will be HUGELY cost effective and serve the needs of the IR community. More to come..... View Quote @TNVC Unrealistic wish list: - smaller and lighter than D2 - illuminator doesn’t have to be as powerful but don’t make it suck like the i2 and a3......make it like half if the D2 - sit low on rail - special introductory price as to where I can get two for a grand or a tad more I’d buy at least two, probably three......maaaayyyyybe four right now. Edit: oh, and fucking have fde availability from the damn get go! |
|
@TNVC it’s already November! Stop the torture. I’m in for 2!!
Small, light, laser and illuminater for 200m, center pressure switch on top, with external pressure pad option. |
|
Quoted:
Is that currently available? Does it have a pressure switch built in or does it take some sort of external pressure switch like the OTAL? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://media3.giphy.com/media/KBx7fQoLxuV7G/giphy.gif By the way, I like the idea of the new Night Optics device https://www.nightoptics.com/product/NC50.htm I’ll have to break down and grab one soon. |
|
|
Quoted:
IMHO, yes in many ways Sir. We will show and tell in November. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Like to point out...In a few months many will see something that will be HUGELY cost effective and serve the needs of the IR community. More to come..... I've liked my OTAL-C so far. I eventually want to get a better unit down the road - but it has served its use so far. |
|
|
Quoted:
Status report please! It’s late November View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Like to point out...In a few months many will see something that will be HUGELY cost effective and serve the needs of the IR community. More to come..... I've liked my OTAL-C so far. I eventually want to get a better unit down the road - but it has served its use so far. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.