Quote History Quoted:
Half a pound is a serious improvement. How much did the work cost?
I'm leery of cutting a bunch of metal off the internal bits affecting durability. The FN SCAR purposely developed around a heavy carrier to slow the cyclic rate and increase reliability, and the ACR design seems similar. I know competitive shooters reduce carrier mass for less muzzle movement, but they also correspondingly reduce gas with adjustable gas blocks. Even still they run on the ragged edge of reliability having to adjust gas settings for different loads and environmental conditions.
Also, my ACR SBR already needs a ton of extractor pressure to run (extra power extractor spring and 0-ring), so I'd be worried about decreased dwell time with a lighter carrier.
View Quote
Are you shooting m193 ammo? None of my rifles require anything g special done to the bolt to run good.
As far as the reliability on the bolts. The acr comes with a 6.8mm bolt carrier so the added mass isn’t needed for 5.56 and 300blk. To be 100% honest, during testing I expected for the blemished bolt I was cutting down to fail.
Once I shot it and did the initial tests I ended up cutting a good one for myself because I liked it so much. The bolts show no signs of being overgassed versus a full weight bolt and have the same reliability.
As far as a heavy carrier being needed for reliability, I’ve shot with a rifle caked in salt (worse than sand since it dissolves and gets deeper into the rifle). Not only did it erode any parkerized finish but it required me to completely tear the rifle down to small parts. The acr functioned 100% with a 10 ounce bolt in 5.56. We shot probably 100 rounds or so after that. The bolt catch actually failed before the rifle did.