Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 8/23/2021 9:35:22 PM EDT
Sharing this from silencer student:

guess maybe it's time to make this announcement.  Dinoprecision , straightsix tactical , sauceco, shrimpgang, quelltech, wtt rearden will all be discontinuing 1.372 od cups in favor of 1.355 as well as more future stuff for 1.625 and 1.75 od. Straight six and mav are only 2 providing tubes and eventually they will phase them out.  That also means no more 1.4375x24 threads. In favor of 1.4375x20. Also 1.625 od tubes will be threaded a more standard thread call out in the future. 1-9/16x24 (thank you eccomachine for the help here) fron these same places.  Hopefully this helps ease confusion and mean larger inventories. Ppa will continue 1.372 so there is some to service what remains.
Edit- to clarify asr bravo tubes would be 1.375x24 mount 1.360 standard d cell Id and 1.4375x20 endcap - exactly like wtt and quell and shrimp already make

Non asr d tubes would remain 1.4375x20 both ends aka an sdtactical or std or mag light tube pattern
View Quote
Thought many of you here would want to know this.
Link Posted: 8/24/2021 10:36:52 AM EDT
[#1]
PPA will still have 1.372 cups.
Link Posted: 8/24/2021 11:14:32 PM EDT
[#2]
Link Posted: 8/26/2021 11:57:57 AM EDT
[#3]
I guess if you want cheaper, thicker, heavier tubes with variable from-the-mill bore one can get away with courser threads that hog out a deeper thread form, but also deliver less mechanical advantage when tightening and compressing the stack.  

This is likely driven by market demographics and sales volume and a desire to mix and match test configurations among existing stamps.  Saving $20 in a tube only to have to fit internals or more likely have sloppier fit is a likely trade off.

When cones were mostly skirtless sanding to fit isn’t as big a deal but skirted cones will likely have to be produced for more fit allowance to preclude hand fitting. Centering/nesting features from the blast chamber spacer to the front cap can remediate that concern. But carbon builds up where gasses have places to leak into, so a tighter stack to tube fit that one gets from a bored tube and tight-tolerance cones is still preferable.

Profit and the one-eyed shall be king.
Link Posted: 8/31/2021 11:11:17 AM EDT
[#4]
I for one am glad for the change, and having same, common thread on both ends, and a common ID make's it simple for those of us who aren't building cans every other week.
Link Posted: 8/31/2021 3:45:25 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I guess if you want cheaper, thicker, heavier tubes with variable from-the-mill bore one can get away with courser threads that hog out a deeper thread form, but also deliver less mechanical advantage when tightening and compressing the stack.  

This is likely driven by market demographics and sales volume and a desire to mix and match test configurations among existing stamps.  Saving $20 in a tube only to have to fit internals or more likely have sloppier fit is a likely trade off.

When cones were mostly skirtless sanding to fit isn’t as big a deal but skirted cones will likely have to be produced for more fit allowance to preclude hand fitting. Centering/nesting features from the blast chamber spacer to the front cap can remediate that concern. But carbon builds up where gasses have places to leak into, so a tighter stack to tube fit that one gets from a bored tube and tight-tolerance cones is still preferable.

Profit and the one-eyed shall be king.
View Quote


This. This is a dumb move. I’m surprised Mav is going this route.
Link Posted: 8/31/2021 5:33:08 PM EDT
[#6]
Well this is idiotic.
Link Posted: 9/10/2021 12:31:11 AM EDT
[#7]
I’ve been bitching for a while about how there’s two standards and that we’ve got mouth breathers who insist on 1.355” ID cans...


Guess the mouth breathers use their wallets more often.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top