Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
9/18/2026 6:04:52 PM EDT
Toying with the idea of a 7" barrel AR PDW.

PDW stock, 7" barrel upper.  10" MLok handguard to "bury" a suppressor.  Suppressor like a Griffin Recce (no barrel length restriction).  FRT.  Red dot sight.  Light.

Thoughts?
Et quant au repos ? Le Caliphate doit être essuyé de la terre.
9/18/2026 6:21:06 PM EDT
[#1]
No reason not too 🤷‍♂️
9/18/2026 6:33:09 PM EDT
[#2]
I've got one with a LAW folder. It's neat.
9/18/2026 6:39:43 PM EDT
[#3]


But in 300blk

9/18/2026 6:47:25 PM EDT
[#4]
I bought an 8.5" barrel yesterday for the same reason.  
Stolen Firearm: Colt AR15, Serial # SP342380, 16" carbine. Stolen in California by Kevin Ayres, and taken to Missouri.
9/18/2026 8:18:10 PM EDT
[Last Edit: PieterCoetzee][Edited] [#5]
First decide on a cartridge.  IF youre fixated on a AR based gun, Id go with 300 Blackout BUT you should consider other platforms, especially if you want a real PDW.

Then decide what you think a PDW is and how it will fit your needs.

Suppressors are cool but they dont fit my idea of a PDW.  I want a PDW to be small enough to conceal and a suppressor complicates that.  Also once the gun is in action, quite is the last thing Im concerned about.

The HK MP5PDW  (MP5K based) is a great PDW, especially with the newer B&T stock.  The US just adopted the B&T APC9 SMG for executive protection teams because it could be concealed until necessary.

Im a fan of the P90 (PS90 SBR).  Its a great PDW and 50 round mags are a huge plus once its time to go LOUD.

Id look seriously at the FLUX and other chassis systems (Strike Industries, Recover 2020).  

All those are better suggestions for a PDW than an AR based gun.  Build what you want but calling a AR a PDW is like calling an apple cart a good option for a spare car
9/18/2026 8:28:19 PM EDT
[Last Edit: stiglitz_actual][Edited] [#6]
Quote History
Originally Posted By PieterCoetzee:
First decide on a cartridge.  IF youre fixated on a AR based gun, Id go with 300 Blackout BUT you should consider other platforms, especially if you want a real PDW.

Then decide what you think a PDW is and how it will fit your needs.

Suppressors are cool but they dont fit my idea of a PDW.  I want a PDW to be small enough to conceal and a suppressor complicates that.  Also once the gun is in action, quite is the last thing Im concerned about.

The HK MP5PDW  (MP5K based) is a great PDW, especially with the newer B&T stock.  The US just adopted the B&T APC9 SMG for executive protection teams because it could be concealed until necessary.

Im a fan of the P90 (PS90 SBR).  Its a great PDW and 50 round mags are a huge plus once its time to go LOUD.

Id look seriously at the FLUX and other chassis systems (Strike Industries, Recover 2020).  

All those are better suggestions for a PDW than an AR based gun.  Build what you want but calling a AR a PDW is like calling an apple cart a good option for a spare car
View Quote


Personally not a fan of the flux-style setups over an mp5k or SBR AR but lots of people do like them
I’ll link the big pdw thread, lots of discussion on the topic and inspiration builds
https://ar15.com/forums/general/A-mostly-peaceful-election-year-Let-s-talk-PDWs-v2-0/5-2730988/
9/18/2026 10:06:33 PM EDT
[Last Edit: PieterCoetzee][Edited] [#7]
Quote History
Originally Posted By stiglitz_actual:


Personally not a fan of the flux-style setups over an mp5k or SBR AR but lots of people do like them
I’ll link the big pdw thread, lots of discussion on the topic and inspiration builds
https://ar15.com/forums/general/A-mostly-peaceful-election-year-Let-s-talk-PDWs-v2-0/5-2730988/
View Quote

Brother you should go whatever route you want but Id suggest that a AR doesnt come close to a PDW.  I say that because of the size.  Making it in 556 or 300BO only futher confounds the problem.  IF you opt for a AR in 9mm you can reduce the size somewhat but it still wont be small enough to conceal without a bag or some such.  Dont get me wrong I like ARs and AR SMGs; but I wouldnt call them a PDW

If we go back to the original PDW concept from the late 1980s, concealment wasnt an issue BUT a small size that would be carried rather than leaning on something when the primary duties of non combat soldiers were being done.  Something with more power and with a greater range than a handgun.  Today I would suggest the greater power is of lesser importance, now being replaced by the ability to be carried out of view being primary.  Considering that a SMG (semi) with a stock or brace should be capable of engaging 100m threats that seems like a good window for a civilian PDW/ If you feel the need for more power/range, then I might lean toward something in 10mm.  For that the Kriss Vector comes to mind.  Its small "snag free" with the 15 round magazine and can of course use larger mags.  It blocky shape makes it easier to "hide" in a Laptop bag.  No AR can be that small

Using the Honey Badger as a concept model, its still 20(+) inches long collapsed.  Thats pretty hard to hide under a jacket and even too large to fit assembled in a typical backpack.  The P90 is 20 inches but ready to fire and with a 50 round mag.  Im not holding my breath for availability but the MP7 (SP7) is only 16" collapsed and able to be fired in the mode.

Again decide what you want a PDW to do for you; but you might even consider the VZ61 (original) Skorpion is micro small at 10" and very easy to carry in the kydex holster from Code 4 Defense.  The 32acp cartridge is enhanced with the TUI (Tumble Upon Impact) ammo.  The stock does take some getting used to; but it is useable.

Im saying all this because PDW has become a flexible term; but there are limits and calling an AR a PDW seems a real stretch
9/19/2026 1:27:14 AM EDT
[#8]
I would say it comes down to how much money you have to throw at it and parts support you have access to.

After that, get what you want.

I have all the parts to turn an AR into a 9mm shooter.  It is fun but I am looking to get a dedicated lower for the 9mm setup.

But man I wish I had the $3K + + to get some version of an MP5 with all the parts to have fun with that.
9/19/2026 1:50:11 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote History

Imagine that in .308!
The “Three Stupid” Rule: “Do not go to stupid places, with stupid people, and do stupid things”

Religion is a handy device for keeping the philosophically deficient in line.
9/19/2026 8:19:13 AM EDT
[Last Edit: PieterCoetzee][Edited] [#10]
Quote History
Originally Posted By JellyBelly:

Imagine that in .308!
View Quote


I have a G3K clone and a AR10 based 12" version they are cool guns but not something Id call a PDW

I think the real question at this point is What is a PDW?  I suppose it could have different meanings to different folks but the farther we drift from the original meaning the less the term means anything
9/19/2026 10:55:33 AM EDT
[#11]
300BO and Maxim Defense are your friends in this journey!
9/20/2026 2:05:13 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote History
Originally Posted By M15A2CLE:
300BO and Maxim Defense are your friends in this journey!
View Quote

I took half your advice, I just picked up a Maxim and the 9mm buffer
9/20/2026 2:14:46 PM EDT
[#13]
Originally Posted By ODA_564:
Toying with the idea of a 7" barrel AR PDW.

PDW stock, 7" barrel upper.  10" MLok handguard to "bury" a suppressor.  Suppressor like a Griffin Recce (no barrel length restriction).  FRT.  Red dot sight.  Light.

Thoughts?
View Quote


Bought a Geissele Gfw upper on here. 7” handguard with an 8” barrel 556.

Not a great pic but the lower has an a5 tube. Have another lower with a KAK mini buffer tube and it is tiny with it.

It’s comically small. I love it.

Attached File
9/20/2026 2:51:18 PM EDT
[#14]
7.0" 300blk with a sico omega 9k under a 8.5" URX4 handguard and a LWRC UCIW stock

Attached File


8.5" 556 with a 8" URX 3.1 handguard and a LAW folder. I've since changed out the stock to a shorter buffer tube with a little magpul stock on it but don't have pics.

Attached File


7.5" 300blk

I originally was going to use a stock/brace like this but realized that the LWRC UCIW stock is just as short collapsed and much more comfortable extended.

Attached File
9/20/2026 3:05:30 PM EDT
[#15]
Since the definition of a PDW came up and may have diluted  this thread, I started a new discussion here
https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/What-is-a-PDW-Lets-discuss/5-2859160/
9/20/2026 4:39:40 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote History
Originally Posted By PieterCoetzee:
First decide on a cartridge.  IF youre fixated on a AR based gun, Id go with 300 Blackout BUT you should consider other platforms, especially if you want a real PDW.

Then decide what you think a PDW is and how it will fit your needs.

Suppressors are cool but they dont fit my idea of a PDW.  I want a PDW to be small enough to conceal and a suppressor complicates that.  Also once the gun is in action, quite is the last thing Im concerned about.

The HK MP5PDW  (MP5K based) is a great PDW, especially with the newer B&T stock.  The US just adopted the B&T APC9 SMG for executive protection teams because it could be concealed until necessary.

Im a fan of the P90 (PS90 SBR).  Its a great PDW and 50 round mags are a huge plus once its time to go LOUD.

Id look seriously at the FLUX and other chassis systems (Strike Industries, Recover 2020).  

All those are better suggestions for a PDW than an AR based gun.  Build what you want but calling a AR a PDW is like calling an apple cart a good option for a spare car
View Quote
I have an SBR PS90 and a 7.5" barrel .300 Blackout SBR.
Et quant au repos ? Le Caliphate doit être essuyé de la terre.
9/20/2026 4:40:31 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote History
I have a 7.5" .300 Blackout.
Et quant au repos ? Le Caliphate doit être essuyé de la terre.
Today 4:51:02 AM EDT
[#18]
Buried or "tucked" suppressors get really hot.
Today 7:25:43 AM EDT
[#19]
Originally Posted By JellyBelly:

Imagine that in .308!
View Quote


Originally Posted By ODA_564:
I have a 7.5" .300 Blackout.
View Quote


Boy do I know what you guys need then
Today 9:23:52 AM EDT
[#20]
I’m not impressed with tucked suppressors either.  Restrictions on suppressor diameter, the handguard gets hot, and the front M-Lok slots are usually unusable because there’s no clearance for the nuts between the can and inside of the handguard.  I have a 8.5” Maxim Defense upper with their 9.5” handguard, and I can’t use some of my suppressors with it because of clearance issues.
Today 9:52:34 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote History
Originally Posted By PieterCoetzee:
Again decide what you want a PDW to do for you; but you might even consider the VZ61 (original) Skorpion is micro small at 10" and very easy to carry in the kydex holster from Code 4 Defense.  The 32acp cartridge is enhanced with the TUI (Tumble Upon Impact) ammo.  The stock does take some getting used to; but it is useable.

I’m saying all this because PDW has become a flexible term; but there are limits and calling an AR a PDW seems a real stretch
View Quote

Agreed. I love this topic, but then I'm a geek when it comes this type of firearm...

A PDW (Personal Defense Weapon) is a compact firearm designed to bridge the gap between a handgun and a full‑size rifle, offering higher capacity, better range, and improved armor penetration in a small, portable package.

A PDW is intended for users who need more capability than a pistol but cannot carry a full rifle—such as vehicle crews, support troops, special forces, or protective details. These weapons emphasize portability, controllability, and effectiveness in close‑quarters environments.

The modern PDW we like to think of when it comes to FN’s P90 and HK’s MP7 were driven by the need for weapons to penetrate body armor while remaining compact.

I like to categorize even though there isn’t a hard category of PDWs. Without going back to black powder cap locks, we have plenty of historical examples of PDWs and Machine Pistols from the Model C96 Mauser “Broomhandle”, Luger P08 Artillery model with stock or the Browning P35 with shoulder stock up to the HK VP70 or Beretta 93R or similar. Essentially handguns with stocks and/or select fire capability as a defensive weapon.

Then, you have the plethora of SMGs throughout the 20th century, with select fire capability and used both as defensive and offensive weapons. Even the venerable M1 Carbine was originally developed for rear-echelon or special troops that weren’t front-line Infantry; essentially a handgun with better ballistics at longer ranges.

I only recall the first modern PDW becoming popular was HK’s MP5K-PDW, released in the early 90’s. A shrunken SMG. The NATO’s needs for armor penetration in PDW format is what sparked the FN P90 and a decade later, the HK MP7.

The rifle caliber PDW’s (SBRs/Rifle-Caliber-Pistols; Honey Badger, Sig Rattler, AKS-74U, etc.) are still pretty damn big and bulky even though they have superior ballistics. I see these less as a PDW and more like the M1 Carbine; a great weapon that can be used for defense and used on offense in shorter ranges.

Machine Pistols/braced-stocked pistols (Flux, Recover Tactical, et al)
SMGs (select fire, or semi auto like the SBR or braced versions of the MP5, B&T, CZ, Kuna, Stribog, MPX, etc.)
PCCs (M1 Carbine, long-barreled pistol caliber carbines)
“PDW” (P90, MP7, MP5K-PDW…)
SBRs (rifle caliber versions)

Size matters. While war-time or overt law-enforcement use cares little for discretion or concealment, the civilian sector does care. Where I think the pistol chassis versions fit are where you want a slightly more capable platform than your CCW, with optic, stock/brace for longer range accuracy and typically greater on board capacity in a package not much larger than your CCW.

The modern 9mm/.45ACP SBR/braced SMG platforms (CZ, HK, B&T, Kuna, Stribog, etc.) are 2-3 times bigger than most pistol chassis. Barrel lengths are of the similar, so velocity isn’t a major advantage, but the platforms often suppress better and have more real estate for lights and lasers and their standard capacity magazines are often twice most handguns but they’re still running pistol calibers.

High velocity PDW. Since HK’s ammo or the MP7 isn’t really common in the civilian market, we’re really left with just the FN 5.7x28mm. Yes, there are similar cartridges available, but most are very niche with small markets. The FN PS90 is the most common, but there are new entries to this PDW category with the new Kel-Tec KP50 (built from the ground up as a SMG, the MP57), and a variety of chassis options for Ruger, CMMG, AR57, and S&W PCCs in 5.7x28mm. The SBR/braced versions are much more compact and similar in size to the more conventional, pseudo-SMGs.

These types of PDWs, IMHO are still very effective as defensive tools that can be carried discreetly. They also suppress much more effectively than their larger PDW cousins in rifle calibers. They can fill the gap a little more effectively between handgun and rifle if you have the capability to carry it discreetly.

SBRs/Rifle-Caliber Pistols. While these can fill the PDW role, they’re pretty bulky. Conversely, they’re much more ballistically superior (even with short barrels) to the pistol calibers at the same ranges. I see these as more rifle than PDW, even if their range is much less than your conventional carbine or rifle. Concealing them is possible but takes effort and their ammunition/magazines are bulkier as well. I think 300BO is intriguing as a larger PDW cartridge as well and well suited to shorter, suppressed barrels.

Range question. PDWs are not long-range weapons. While we could debate “personal defense ranges”, most PDWs cap their effectiveness out to 100-150 meters and for some, ballistics is considerably less than your handgun at the muzzle. Ballistics aside, a stocked or braced pistol caliber SMG/PDW is more than accurate enough at 100-150 yards to put lead on target.

All the above could serve the civilian as a PDW but those requirements would vary as would their ability to be carried discreetly; a critical factor for the modern civilian PDW. Regardless, I find their value can offer a lot to the modern civilian who wants to have something close that gives more capability than their daily CCW and where there their rifle is back home, in the truck and not feasible or easily carried overtly.

CCW = Get off the “X”
PDW = Get out of the immediate danger radius of the “X”
Rifle = Defend the home from the “X” or attack the threat of the “X”

















ROCK6
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants" - Thomas Jefferson
Today 10:02:59 AM EDT
[Last Edit: FRT][Edited] [#22]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Deny_Everything:
I've got one with a LAW folder. It's neat.
View Quote

I ended up removing all of my LAW folders.  They added a bunch of weight and failure points without providing any real benefit for me.  LWRC UCIW stock or SB HBPDW brace is the way to go IMO.
Today 10:41:53 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote History
Originally Posted By KitBuilder:
Buried or "tucked" suppressors get really hot.
View Quote
Good input.
Et quant au repos ? Le Caliphate doit être essuyé de la terre.
Today 10:52:59 AM EDT
[#24]
Attached File

My Frugal Ferret is a 6” .300blk.
Today 11:14:04 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote History
Originally Posted By PieterCoetzee:
First decide on a cartridge.  IF youre fixated on a AR based gun, Id go with 300 Blackout BUT you should consider other platforms, especially if you want a real PDW.

Then decide what you think a PDW is and how it will fit your needs.

Suppressors are cool but they dont fit my idea of a PDW.  I want a PDW to be small enough to conceal and a suppressor complicates that.  Also once the gun is in action, quite is the last thing Im concerned about.

The HK MP5PDW  (MP5K based) is a great PDW, especially with the newer B&T stock.  The US just adopted the B&T APC9 SMG for executive protection teams because it could be concealed until necessary.

Im a fan of the P90 (PS90 SBR).  Its a great PDW and 50 round mags are a huge plus once its time to go LOUD.

Id look seriously at the FLUX and other chassis systems (Strike Industries, Recover 2020).  

All those are better suggestions for a PDW than an AR based gun.  Build what you want but calling a AR a PDW is like calling an apple cart a good option for a spare car
View Quote
Easy enough to build a 5.7 AR and a small suppressor will do a lot to take the edge off there. There's the CMMG stuff and the AR57 stuff that takes PS90 mags.
You must play the game. You can't win. You can't break even. You can't quit the game.
Today 12:05:58 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote History
Originally Posted By jhereg:
Easy enough to build a 5.7 AR and a small suppressor will do a lot to take the edge off there. There's the CMMG stuff and the AR57 stuff that takes PS90 mags.
View Quote

Just adding to the context of the PDW as orignally defined by NATO (not necessarily by name) in the 1980's.

Flux Defense has a good piece on this topic:
FLUX Defense - What is a PDW

Excerp (Ironically NATO never publically used the official term of PDW, but manufactures did based on discussions in the 1980's).

In the late 1980s, NATO saw a potential issue on the horizon with the standard secondary weapon for support vehicle crews: the 9mm submachine gun. Advancements in body armor had reached a point where they could more or less defeat a 9mm round. To counter this, NATO published Document D/296 in 1989.  This doc requested a replacement for the standard 9×19mm Parabellum round and two new weapons in the replacement caliber; one shoulder-fired and one hand-held. The new caliber and weapons systems were intended to be

“personal protection in last-resort situations when the user is directly endangered by the enemy.”

The first “by name” personal defense weapons.

D/296 laid out specific requirements for new round and weapons.

Compact, with an overall length no greater than an average soldier’s should width (approximately 50cm/20in)
Capable of defeating CRISAT-standard soft body armor at 200 meters
Better range and accuracy than the 9mm round
The shoulder-fired PDW had to weigh less than 3kg/6.6lbs with a magazine capacity of at least 20 rounds
The handheld PDW had to weigh less than 1kg/2.2lbs with a magazine capacity of at least 20 rounds
Both PDWs had to be compact enough to be carried “hands-free” by a soldier at all times, whether in a vehicle, aircraft cockpit, or when doing their normal job

What Makes a PDW a PDW

Strip away the brand names and the history, and the PDW reduces to five functional traits:

Compact Form
Shorter overall length than a standard carbine. Operable in confined spaces like vehicle interiors, stairwells, doorways. Transportable in a bag, case, or on the body without significantly impeding other work.

Greater Capability Than a Handgun
Longer effective range, improved accuracy through additional contact points, longer sight radius, and higher magazine capacity.

Defensive Orientation
PDWs are built for reactive engagements. The user’s primary mission is something other than combat and their defensive tool needs to be ready when required without impeding how they move, work, or carry.

Rapid Deployment
The weapon needs to go from carried to ready faster than a slung carbine allows, and in more situations than a holstered pistol permits

Portability and Concealment as Priorities
Portability and concealment are intentional design aspects of PDWs, not afterthoughts. A weapons platform that meets the first four criteria but requires a dedicated rifle case is not a PDW.

What a PDW is Not
A PDW is not a primary combat weapon. It’s not intended to be a standard-issue infantry rifle. Compared to a standard service rifle, a PDW lacks range and terminal performance, but that’s an intentional tradeoff for all the traits listed above. Understanding those trade-offs is much more useful than pretending they don’t exist.
...

ROCK6
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants" - Thomas Jefferson

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In

Armory Sponsor