User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 7/31/2021 12:40:47 PM EDT
[#1]
I wouldn't hesitate for such calibers as .25 & .32. I don't think it would be terrible on 9mm. Just don't expect that which a full size would provide. I think I'd prefer more Ti or Al components, to shed weight and decrease the need for a booster (if pistol is your focus).
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/31/2021 5:02:05 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I wouldn't hesitate for such calibers as .25 & .32. I don't think it would be terrible on 9mm. Just don't expect that which a full size would provide. I think I'd prefer more Ti or Al components, to shed weight and decrease the need for a booster (if pistol is your focus). They have full sized tubes and cups , stainless blast baffle and the rest titanium. Specifically I’m looking at the 1.355 cones they make. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/1/2021 10:07:24 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They have full sized tubes and cups , stainless blast baffle and the rest titanium. Specifically I’m looking at the 1.355 cones they make. I apologize. I thought you were asking about using the 22 sized cones for 9mm. I don't see why that same design should be anything but great for 9mm (appropriately sized). I still don't see the need for SS, on a 9mm design. I'd have no qualms w/ an all Al design, save for maybe a Ti mount and BB. 9mm doesn't require progressive spacing so baffles can always be rotated around (to decrease single baffle over erosion). |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/2/2021 3:45:36 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I apologize. I thought you were asking about using the 22 sized cones for 9mm. I don't see why that same design should be anything but great for 9mm (appropriately sized). I still don't see the need for SS, on a 9mm design. I'd have no qualms w/ an all Al design, save for maybe a Ti mount and BB. 9mm doesn't require progressive spacing so baffles can always be rotated around (to decrease single baffle over erosion). It’s for a machine gun |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/2/2021 7:38:40 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:It’s for a machine gun So were the M-10 & M-11 suppressors 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/2/2021 11:27:49 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So were the M-10 & M-11 suppressors That is a fair point |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
