User Panel
Posted: 10/1/2017 11:47:49 PM EDT
Looks like it's finally out, albeit an exclusive through Zev for now. http://www.zevtechnologies.com/kraken
I've been intrigued by this can for about a year now and forgot about it pretty much till I watched a clip on its performance today. Holy crap it's quiet! Only downside is all but the blast baffle is aluminum. Shielded yes, so they shouldn't get too dirty but being able to throw them in the dip woulda been nice. I'm guessing it's designed more for pistol hosts than sub guns being as light as it is. Quick clip from NFA review https://instagram.com/p/BZq8idSAtRN/ |
|
They should list a price if they really want to sell some but it does seem quiet. The one I handled felt very light.
|
|
CMCGOV is listing them for $879. Must be logged in to see price, but not letting you order one yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just saw that Hansohn Bro's has these in stock, so maybe they can answer this. Is it modular, one of the pictures on your site looks like a section can be removed? How does this thing actually sound relative to what's on the market right now, tyrant 9m and the popular 45's at the moment?
|
|
Quoted:
Just saw that Hansohn Bro's has these in stock, so maybe they can answer this. Is it modular, one of the pictures on your site looks like a section can be removed? How does this thing actually sound relative to what's on the market right now, tyrant 9m and the popular 45's at the moment? View Quote |
|
|
|
I want to see what the baffle stack looks like. Must be some next level wizardry to obtain that DB level.
|
|
|
Quoted:
Just saw that Hansohn Bro's has these in stock, so maybe they can answer this. Is it modular, one of the pictures on your site looks like a section can be removed? How does this thing actually sound relative to what's on the market right now, tyrant 9m and the popular 45's at the moment? View Quote |
|
|
Thanks for the pic. Didn’t think to look on Zevs website.
Wish the baffles were all stainless or titanium. |
|
It got metered on a Beretta at the NFAtalk silencer shoot in Georgia this year
|
|
Quoted:
It got metered on a Beretta at the NFAtalk silencer shoot in Georgia this year View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Ok aaaannnnnnddddd the numbers were? What was it compared to? What ammo and equipment was used? Need more info. Need more than “it got metered on a Beretta at the NFAtalk silencer shoot in Georgia this year.” View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It got metered on a Beretta at the NFAtalk silencer shoot in Georgia this year |
|
Anyone have anymore information about these? Anymore reviews/metering?
|
|
https://www.facebook.com/chaosgearsupply/videos/1494932860591354/
NFA Review shooting in his back yard. |
|
I've seen that video already. I was hoping someone had gotten a hold of one and did some metering.
|
|
This can really has my attention but it is certainly steep...
|
|
Wonder what the poi shift is with the asymmetrical clip, sure sounds quiet though
|
|
The fact that the company only releases dB numbers using 165gr ammo is a huge red flag.
|
|
|
@HansonBrothers have you all had a chance to shoot this can yet? If so your thoughts/impressions?
|
|
|
|
I talked about this suppressor with one of the CGS employees over at the M4Carbine forums, it started off from my comments on their centrefire calibre suppressor claims.
Which I doubted. Our DUAL .22 rimfire suppressor is very effective, doing c. 116-117 dB with sub sonic ammo 1 m to the side of the muzzle. So I highly doubt any claims of sub 120 dB with a 9 mm suppressor. Like I doubted the sub 120 dB claims of that one particular AR suppressor on the forums here and folks may remember how that turned out. All props to any of the colleague companies in this industry. However there are just certain sound pressure levels that no manufacturer has yet reached on a particular weapon / calibre and when someone comes in with 10+ dB improvements, it does bring about doubts. Best Regards! Tuukka Jokinen Ase Utra sound suppressors |
|
Apparently from what I was told, it was tested wet, and with hush (under pressure loaded 9mm ammo). So the SPL cant be compared to other category products. The typical products are tested with full power 147 grain ammo and dry with no ablative media in the suppressor.
|
|
Quoted:
Apparently from what I was told, it was tested wet, and with hush (under pressure loaded 9mm ammo). So the SPL cant be compared to other category products. The typical products are tested with full power 147 grain ammo and dry with no ablative media in the suppressor. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Apparently from what I was told, it was tested wet, and with hush (under pressure loaded 9mm ammo). So the SPL cant be compared to other category products. The typical products are tested with full power 147 grain ammo and dry with no ablative media in the suppressor. View Quote It is also very deceptive to suppressor newbies who shop based on numbers and rumors. |
|
|
|
|
I shot it at the nfa review expo and it was very quite but the rep couldn’t tell me what’s the dB levels were as she didn’t know and there was no meter there as well.
|
|
|
Never tested the Kraken wet. 10 shot averages with a dry can meter 114 consistently with Hush 165. We totally get that those are better than most rimfire numbers. They are actually better than our Hydra SS and AL numbers by a fairly significant margin. Those are our numbers our meter etc Take them for what they are. We all live in a world of deceptive marketing practices especially when it comes to the suppressor industry.
Hansohn Brothers did some 3rd party testing with American Eagle 147 dry of course and it metered 120 avg for them on the cz host. We have a Sphinx at the shop that we did some initial testing with and it was the loudest host we used. We shot the kraken on Sig, Glock, HK, and Beretta. I believe the beretta and HK VP9 were the quietest hosts. If you don’t think Freedom Munitions Hush 165 will get you from 120 to 114 you have never fired any. It’s insanely quiet purpose built ammunition for suppressor use. Our Hydra 22 can meters 120 with 22 lr subs on a ruger 22/45 host. It is so quiet we actually had to go back to the drawing board on the rimfire can all together. I mean what silencer company has a 9mm can that’s quieter than their 22 can? Why use Freedom Munitions Hush Ammo because we have yet to find a quieter combination. We assumed that ultra quiet is what most folks want out of their can to begin with so why not cut to the chase. Also Jeremy and the fellas at Freedom Munitions have been super good to us providing a lot of the ammo we used for testing as well as for the various shoots we have attended thus far. Made sense for us to give them credit for this as it really is the very quietest ammunition we have found that will reliably cycle the slide on a semi auto. Your personal experience with that ammunition in your particular firearm may differ and you can certainly fire any 9mm ammunition you would like through the Kraken and expect phenomenal results. We welcome you to seek out data from other sources. Just remember this is the internet so ymmv. The internet is a place where no one has to be accountable for their words. It’s where you may hear stuff like the “Someone told me they shot it wet” nonsense above. From what I have seen thus far out of the guys at Hansohn Brothers they are running a legitimate mil spec test. I would definitely consider them a fantastic source for sound testing data and excellent spot to purchase a Kraken. We have more in stock and ready to form if they run out. |
|
NFATalk.org metered it this summer with 147 and 165.
Data on their running spreadsheet |
|
Quoted:
Never tested the Kraken wet. 10 shot averages with a dry can meter 114 consistently with Hush 165. We totally get that those are better than most rimfire numbers. They are actually better than our Hydra SS and AL numbers by a fairly significant margin. Those are our numbers our meter etc Take them for what they are. We all live in a world of deceptive marketing practices especially when it comes to the suppressor industry. Hansohn Brothers did some 3rd party testing with American Eagle 147 dry of course and it metered 120 avg for them on the cz host. We have a Sphinx at the shop that we did some initial testing with and it was the loudest host we used. We shot the kraken on Sig, Glock, HK, and Beretta. I believe the beretta and HK VP9 were the quietest hosts. If you don’t think Freedom Munitions Hush 165 will get you from 120 to 114 you have never fired any. It’s insanely quiet purpose built ammunition for suppressor use. Our Hydra 22 can meters 120 with 22 lr subs on a ruger 22/45 host. It is so quiet we actually had to go back to the drawing board on the rimfire can all together. I mean what silencer company has a 9mm can that’s quieter than their 22 can? Why use Freedom Munitions Hush Ammo because we have yet to find a quieter combination. We assumed that ultra quiet is what most folks want out of their can to begin with so why not cut to the chase. Also Jeremy and the fellas at Freedom Munitions have been super good to us providing a lot of the ammo we used for testing as well as for the various shoots we have attended thus far. Made sense for us to give them credit for this as it really is the very quietest ammunition we have found that will reliably cycle the slide on a semi auto. Your personal experience with that ammunition in your particular firearm may differ and you can certainly fire any 9mm ammunition you would like through the Kraken and expect phenomenal results. We welcome you to seek out data from other sources. Just remember this is the internet so ymmv. The internet is a place where no one has to be accountable for their words. It’s where you may hear stuff like the “Someone told me they shot it wet” nonsense above. From what I have seen thus far out of the guys at Hansohn Brothers they are running a legitimate mil spec test. I would definitely consider them a fantastic source for sound testing data and excellent spot to purchase a Kraken. We have more in stock and ready to form if they run out. View Quote |
|
|
Chris Hanson is very good. His meter is not. He will be getting a MilSpec meter as soon as he can find one. He has seen the light with his own side by side test of meters.
I'm not questioning the Kraken. I heard one with the Hush ammo this week. It sounded awesome. The picture posted was with a 2209 so it should be good to go. Bobby is straight forward good guy. Hey Mr West why don't you send me one of those please for my Glock. Really! |
|
Yup, I heard that digital one is going on eBay lol.
Quoted:
Chris Hanson is very good. His meter is not. He will be getting a MilSpec meter as soon as he can find one. He has seen the light with his own side by side test of meters. I'm not questioning the Kraken. I heard one with the Hush ammo this week. It sounded awesome. The picture posted was with a 2209 so it should be good to go. Bobby is straight forward good guy. Hey Mr West why don't you send me one of those please for my Glock. Really! View Quote |
|
As soon as I get mine, I will test with my not mil spec Larson Davis and I will do it side by side with the obsidian and mask. I’ll post all 3 numbers and we will see.
|
|
Ray
That would be my pleasure brother. I will form one out to you tomorrow. |
|
Bax, Josh and Ray; thank you for the kind words. Yes, I own a Larson/Davis LTX1-QPR. I have seen the conflicting information regarding this meter, ASE/UTRA's Tuuka writing on the subject (among others) and read Ray and Frank's article (Integrally Suppressed RPR, starting at post 21). I've known Ray for several years and he's not one to bullshit you. I don't know Frank personally, maybe traded a few emails, but doesn't strike me as a shit-bird either. With them saying it was bad, maybe this is something worth investigating? So, I decided to borrow a BK 2209 and see for myself. I calibrated both meters and set them up just like the RPR test and was instantly greeted with conflicting data between the 2209 and the QPR. So I moved the QPR to the same location of the 2209, more bad data. Ok, is it consistent, hoping I could just add 2 or 3 db and be good? Nope, not even close. I was seeing non-linear differences of 2~9 db. That's significant. I wished I had recorded the results but I was so frustrated and disgusted over the time and money wasted. I swear I could hear Pat Rogers' voice saying "Just as good usually isn't..." So, I spent most of last night researching the topic. Ray sent me a link to an outstanding article: Principles of Full Matrix Capture (page 32 if you want to skip ahead). Now, the QPR is a fine meter, it just not designed to measure gun shots, regardless what the Larson/Davis rep tells you.
TL/DR: The Larson is not a valid meter for measuring gun shots and here's why: It simply cannot capture the peak of the gunshot. Also, the sampling rate is too low. Take either of those shortcomings and what you get is bad data. There is nothing that can be done to overcome that. Any data that I posted prior to yesterday should be considered invalid. Now if y'all excuse me, I need to find a good recipe for crow..... |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.