|
Originally Posted By TGWLDR: Again? https://www.ar15.com/forums/AR-15/I-spent-half-a-band-to-buy-a-counterbalancing-buffer-system-for-the-AR15-ask-me-anything/118-794583/ Very odd. OP what in the world. |
|
Originally Posted By TGWLDR: Again? https://www.ar15.com/forums/AR-15/I-spent-half-a-band-to-buy-a-counterbalancing-buffer-system-for-the-AR15-ask-me-anything/118-794583/ Obsessed with the gadget |
|
Here's the 'Amphibian' setup of Kynshot Hydraulic buffer + A5 + Tubb flatwire spring. 580rpm and good controllability: Video in link:
Original rate of fire with H2 buffer video:
|
|
Originally Posted By spydercomonkey: Here's the 'Amphibian' setup of Kynshot Hydraulic buffer + A5 + Tubb flatwire spring. 580rpm and good controllability: Video in link:
Original rate of fire with H2 buffer video:
|
|
Originally Posted By spydercomonkey: Here's the 'Amphibian' setup of Kynshot Hydraulic buffer + A5 + Tubb flatwire spring. 580rpm and good controllability: Video in link:
Original rate of fire with H2 buffer video:
I don't know man... The higher ROF looked like there was less movement, which mirrors my own observations with 16" ARs. |
|
Originally Posted By georgeib: I don't know man... The higher ROF looked like there was less movement, which mirrors my own observations with 16" ARs. Originally Posted By georgeib: Originally Posted By spydercomonkey: Here's the 'Amphibian' setup of Kynshot Hydraulic buffer + A5 + Tubb flatwire spring. 580rpm and good controllability: Video in link:
Original rate of fire with H2 buffer video:
I don't know man... The higher ROF looked like there was less movement, which mirrors my own observations with 16" ARs. I think the higher ROF looks smoother / less visible bounce. But in terms of controlling 3 and 6 round bursts, the higher ROF had a lot more climb / dispersion due to shoving harder at the beginning of the firing cycle. And ultimately 3-6rd controllability matters more then mag dumping. At 25yd 3rd burst I had a lot more accidental headshots or rounds climbing off target with the 880rpm H2 then the 580rpm Hydraulic. Hoping to go to the range tomorrow and testing out to 50yd standing, which will really tell the tale. That was basically worthless vs semi auto with the 880rpm, the first round would hit the center of the target and the other 2 rounds would be off somewhere in the carboard ether. |
|
Originally Posted By spydercomonkey: I think the higher ROF looks smoother / less visible bounce. But in terms of controlling 3 and 6 round bursts, the higher ROF had a lot more climb / dispersion due to shoving harder at the beginning of the firing cycle. And ultimately 3-6rd controllability matters more then mag dumping. At 25yd 3rd burst I had a lot more accidental headshots or rounds climbing off target with the 880rpm H2 then the 580rpm Hydraulic. Hoping to go to the range tomorrow and testing out to 50yd standing, which will really tell the tale. That was basically worthless vs semi auto with the 880rpm, the first round would hit the center of the target and the other 2 rounds would be off somewhere in the carboard ether. Good point. Need to try one and see if it improves my bursts. |

