Quote History Quoted:
I doubt I would be pushing it past 100 yards. Just trying to get something that will be reliable. I think the PSA got my attention due to the longer rail and thinking that might be more comfortable.
View Quote
Reliability does and does not care about your barrel length.
It does, because dwell time, or the time the bullet spends after passing the gas port and before leaving the barrel.
It doesn't, because you can (to a point) compensate for a short dwell time by just making the gas port bigger.
Either way, the shorter you go the more your gas port size matters. If you go too small you'll be under-gassed, but as always, you can go too big and over-gas your rifle, especially if you're running something like the 5.56 IMI Razor Core 69gr instead of lower pressure .223 Tula 55grn. Personally, I wouldn't expect much trouble with either barrel setup. The 10.5/3 range is generally considered to be as short as you can go without having to deal with with much if any issues. You start getting below the 10.3in range, your gas system and gun gets more finicky.
I'm a big fan of running an adjustable gas system, but another way you can go about it if you do need to make adjustments is by tuning your buffer spring and reciprocating weight. If you're under-gassed, lighter spring or less reciprocating mass can help with that. If you're over-gassed, heavier reciprocating mass and/or heavier spring pressure will do it.
For under-gassing, that's how it be. But for overgassing, this is just a bandaid, as you're still dumping well more gas than necessary into the BCG/Receiver. So while your longevity may be marginally down compared to an adjustable gas block, it'll fix your function issues.
TL;DR - Either should be fine. Pick the one that makes you happiest.