My Two Cents.
I am not a Brand Snob. I do research, and determine what I think will work best for me for my application. Some Hunting, Possible Self Defense, and a lot of Range Shooting for my AR's.
An Example:
My 700 Remington 308 Sniper Rifle has the Badger 306-06-A3 USMC SA M40 A3/A5 Rail, 30 MOA Scope Base that goes in the Action Stripper Clip Slot. Built 20 some years ago. At that time I felt this was THE BEST Scope Base Made for a 700 Remington. I have not seen anything I thought was better to date. The Badger Base and Rings were pretty pricy at the time, and still are, but I thought they were worth the cost for what I was getting. The Best Product Made For The Application. This rifle has a Rock 5R Barrel, Accuracy International AICS 1.0 Stock, a Jewel Trigger, and the Badger Push Button Bolt Release done my GA at a later date. It still has the original Premier Reticle Leupold 30mm 6.5-20X Mil Dot Scope installed when the build was completed. The Badger Scope Base was in line with the quality of the rest of the build.
My Point is I will spend money on things that I see are superior in quality for my needs, "within reason".
Back to the AR15
All I require is a Quality AR15 Cantilever Scope Base to mount a Scope. I do not require all the Battle Rattle Attachment Points a Badger C1 provides. Marty has covered all the Bases on the C1. If I were building a Full Blown AR15 Sniper/Combat Rifle the Badger C1 would probably make the top of my list. However I do not require an Angle Cosine Indicator, Data Card Holder, Laser Attachment Point, or all sorts of Red Dot Mounting options. For a Combat AR the C1 would be a top choice, and probably as good as it gets.
Like I said above all that I require is a Quality Cantilever Scope Base to Mount a Scope. My only added accessory's would be an Anti Cant Device, and a Caldwell Brass Catcher Base. The Bubble Levels I use all attach to the scope tube, and work fine. The Brass Catcher Base's attaches to the Rail behind the Cantilever Scope Base.
I have FOUR Leupold MK AR 30mm Cantilever Bases at this time. My brother just asked what I might want for my Birthday. I told him a Leupold MK AR 30mm Cantilever Scope Base, and gave him the Midway Part Number. That one will be Number FIVE. In my opinion this base is rock solid and a very good bargain for the price. You can spend more money on a Cantilever Base, but I am not sure that you could notice any improvement in accuracy or durability over the MK AR as a "Scope Mount". For my money and uses this base is a winner.
MARK AR vs IMS Cantilever Mount:
Why the Big Difference in Price? Great Question with no good answer that I can determine. Both are made from Aluminum. Both have a 1.5" Scope Height from the Rail (35mm). The MARK AR has FIVE Attachment Bolts, the IMS has only Two. My Best Guess would be that Leupold decided that a much more "AFFORDABLE" "QUALITY" Cantilever Scope Base would sell a lot more units and be a lot more popular than an expensive "same quality" base with it's main claim to fame being Leupold Marked on it. I am a very good example of this. I have several MK AR Bases. I still have a couple non MK AR Cantilever Bases on AR's, that will be replaced shortly with Leupold MK AR's. For $85 I find the MK AR to be the most Bang for my Buck's that I have seen in an AR15 Base designed to just mount a scope. However at $300 for the IMS I would be researching the field to see what Badger C1 "Same Price", Warne, Geissele, Seekins, and a few others had to offer for the money. If I had a choice between the MK AR and the IMS for $85 I would still stay with the MK AR Cantilever Base. For the $300 price of a IMS I would go with a Badger C1 at $303 over the Leupold without much thought. This is probably the reason for bringing out the MK AR Series (Much Cheaper Cost) Cantilever Base. I would probably not spend $300 each on several Cantilever Scope Bases. I have no problem owning several of the same quality for $85 each.
If I were inclined and had a good reason to need more room between the rings, I would consider the BCM A/T Riser with a set of Appropriate Height Quality Rings as an alternative to a Cantilever Mount.
Bob R