[ARCHIVED THREAD] - President Perry? (Page 1 of 3)
Posted: 8/1/2011 7:10:37 PM EDT
|
What do ya'll think?
Personally I am beginning to like the sound of it. Has a nice ring to it. Really think he is the strongest competitor obama has. I love to see a Perry Cain/Bachmann ticket. |
|
Honestly, I think he's Texas's answer to Mitt Romney: Knows how to pander to the local crowd, but doesn't have any strong convictions of his own.
We could do a LOT better. Having said that, I wouldn't hesitate to vote for him against Obama. The makeup of the Supreme Court (not to mention numerous lower courts) hangs in the balance - and he's a lot less likely to put another Elena Kagan or Sonia Sotomayor on the bench than Obama is. |
| Too much baggage from the last Governor from Texas. If the GOP wants to win then run Romney and call it a day. Yeah, he's a RINO on social matters but he's very sharp and knowledgeable on Capitalism which is what this country must get back to for survival. Palatable enough to be embraced by the mushy middle who actually decide elections in this country. |
|
Quoted:
Too much baggage from the last Governor from Texas. If the GOP wants to win then run Romney and call it a day. Yeah, he's a RINO on social matters but he's very sharp and knowledgeable on Capitalism which is what this country must get back to for survival. Palatable enough to be embraced by the mushy middle who actually decide elections in this country. Well, the one piece of lead laced baggage Mitt is just not going to be able to shake is his unshaken support for Romney-care. |
|
I'd vote for dying in office, but sooner rather than later.
If the republitards are stupid enough to run this piece of excriment they deserve to lose to Maobama in 12. I'm done voting the lesser of two evils. Please save your tired "throwing your vote away" arguements, you're throwing your vote away voting for a tool like Slick Rick or McCan't. Lame Republican't candidates are THE direct cause for Obummer being in office. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Perry/Rudy 2012. That would be fun to watch. http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/4863/rudycollection.jpg beat me to it.. I like rudy, but not as a political figure! |
|
I'm not the biggest Perry fan, but "President Perry" sounds a hell of a lot better than "President Obama". Plus, he's equally hated by the far Left and far Right. Heads would explode everywhere.
As imperfect as Perry is, I'm having trouble finding anyone better. |
|
Quoted:
I'm not the biggest Perry fan, but "President Perry" sounds a hell of a lot better than "President Obama". Plus, he's equally hated by the far Left and far Right. Heads would explode everywhere. As imperfect as Perry is, I'm having trouble finding anyone better. There are a lot of people around here that hate Perry... but as you say, he's a lot better than a lot of the other crappy people who are running. Looking at the current field of challengers Obama faces I see a lot of RINOs and/or unelectable people. Sarah Palin & Michelle Bachmann? Unelectable. Romney, Guiliani, etc... blue state RINOs. Most of the rest of them aren't even memorable. Some of them seem like a cruel joke... All that said, I think the fact that Perry is from Texas would give him a very hard uphill battle for the presidency. Too much of the rest of the country would be against him just because of that. |
|
Quoted:
I'd vote for dying in office, but sooner rather than later. If the republitards are stupid enough to run this piece of excriment they deserve to lose to Maobama in 12. I'm done voting the lesser of two evils. Please save your tired "throwing your vote away" arguements, you're throwing your vote away voting for a tool like Slick Rick or McCan't. Lame Republican't candidates are THE direct cause for Obummer being in office. Really, really? You think there's no difference between Perry and Obama. Slick Rick has his issues but he'd be a hell of a lot better than that Marxist in there now. Hell, my dog would do a better job for the country. |
|
Quoted:
If that's what it takes to get him the hell out of Texas vs. dying in office, then I'll send a check! He, he. We could kill two birds with one stone. Get rid of the Marxist and send Gov. Goodhair out of Texas. I have a longing to see Perry go to Washington, have that douchebag Dewhurst become Senator and then we could have Jerry Patterson as Governor and have some real 2nd amendment support in Austin. Though a Romney/Rubio ticket is the surest thing to beat Obama. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'd vote for dying in office, but sooner rather than later. If the republitards are stupid enough to run this piece of excriment they deserve to lose to Maobama in 12. I'm done voting the lesser of two evils. Please save your tired "throwing your vote away" arguements, you're throwing your vote away voting for a tool like Slick Rick or McCan't. Lame Republican't candidates are THE direct cause for Obummer being in office. Really, really? You think there's no difference between Perry and Obama. Slick Rick has his issues but he'd be a hell of a lot better than that Marxist in there now. Hell, my dog would do a better job for the country. Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it? I never said anything remotely close to 'there's no difference between Perry and Obama'. However, if you think Perry is any less corrupt than Maobamma, I have a bridge to sell you. Perry is a spineless any way the wind blows politician. His only loyalty is to his own collossal ego and his bank account. Morons voted for Maobama because they listened to what he said, rather than looking at who he is and what he did. I guess now a whole new crop of morons will vote for Perry for the same reason. Either way, Romney, Perry, Palin, or any of the other limp wrist 'electables' will lose handily to Lord Obummer. I haven't met your dog, but I would vote for him over Governor McHairdo or the Obamanation. |
|
Quoted:
I read your post just fine, your one of those whiner types that will never be happy with any politician unless they were an exact twin of yourself. Guess what? You'll never have a perfect candidate. Perry might stink but he's so much better than the Marxist and even better than our last candidate McCain.
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'd vote for dying in office, but sooner rather than later. If the republitards are stupid enough to run this piece of excriment they deserve to lose to Maobama in 12. I'm done voting the lesser of two evils. Please save your tired "throwing your vote away" arguements, you're throwing your vote away voting for a tool like Slick Rick or McCan't. Lame Republican't candidates are THE direct cause for Obummer being in office. Really, really? You think there's no difference between Perry and Obama. Slick Rick has his issues but he'd be a hell of a lot better than that Marxist in there now. Hell, my dog would do a better job for the country. Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it? I never said anything remotely close to 'there's no difference between Perry and Obama'. However, if you think Perry is any less corrupt than Maobamma, I have a bridge to sell you. Perry is a spineless any way the wind blows politician. His only loyalty is to his own collossal ego and his bank account. Morons voted for Maobama because they listened to what he said, rather than looking at who he is and what he did. I guess now a whole new crop of morons will vote for Perry for the same reason. Either way, Romney, Perry, Palin, or any of the other limp wrist 'electables' will lose handily to Lord Obummer. I haven't met your dog, but I would vote for him over Governor McHairdo or the Obamanation. |
|
Quoted:
I'd vote for Perry over Obama. Unfortunately, pretty much every presidential election since 1988 hasn't been about voting for the best candidate, it's been about voting for the lesser of two evils. True. I don't trust any professional politician, but someone who would do what it would take to bring this country back would have no chance of getting elected. With Perry it gives me a few more years to prep. |
|
Let's see:
signed in state tuition for illegal aliens promoted the Trans Texas corridor mandated HPV vaccinations for grade school girls Let the sanctuary cities bill die in the special session because of pressure from two fat cat contributors. Has no problem with gay marriage in other states. Better than Obama, true, but not to be trusted, especially on immigration. |
|
Quoted:
Let's see: signed in state tuition for illegal aliens promoted the Trans Texas corridor mandated HPV vaccinations for grade school girls Let the sanctuary cities bill die in the special session because of pressure from two fat cat contributors. Has no problem with gay marriage in other states. Better than Obama, true, but not to be trusted, especially on immigration. Both parties have sold out the public when it comes to immigration. They both know they can't beat the other without the Taco vote. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I read your post just fine, your one of those whiner types that will never be happy with any politician unless they were an exact twin of yourself. Guess what? You'll never have a perfect candidate. Perry might stink but he's so much better than the Marxist and even better than our last candidate McCain.
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'd vote for dying in office, but sooner rather than later. If the republitards are stupid enough to run this piece of excriment they deserve to lose to Maobama in 12. I'm done voting the lesser of two evils. Please save your tired "throwing your vote away" arguements, you're throwing your vote away voting for a tool like Slick Rick or McCan't. Lame Republican't candidates are THE direct cause for Obummer being in office. Really, really? You think there's no difference between Perry and Obama. Slick Rick has his issues but he'd be a hell of a lot better than that Marxist in there now. Hell, my dog would do a better job for the country. Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it? I never said anything remotely close to 'there's no difference between Perry and Obama'. However, if you think Perry is any less corrupt than Maobamma, I have a bridge to sell you. Perry is a spineless any way the wind blows politician. His only loyalty is to his own collossal ego and his bank account. Morons voted for Maobama because they listened to what he said, rather than looking at who he is and what he did. I guess now a whole new crop of morons will vote for Perry for the same reason. Either way, Romney, Perry, Palin, or any of the other limp wrist 'electables' will lose handily to Lord Obummer. I haven't met your dog, but I would vote for him over Governor McHairdo or the Obamanation. Wow, you still can't read, but you can jump through teh intrawebs and give me a psych profile. No wonder Perry always wins! Oh, and BTW, it's you're, not your, Sir Readsalot. |
|
Quoted:
I rest my case. Have a good day.Quoted:
Quoted:
I read your post just fine, your one of those whiner types that will never be happy with any politician unless they were an exact twin of yourself. Guess what? You'll never have a perfect candidate. Perry might stink but he's so much better than the Marxist and even better than our last candidate McCain.
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'd vote for dying in office, but sooner rather than later. If the republitards are stupid enough to run this piece of excriment they deserve to lose to Maobama in 12. I'm done voting the lesser of two evils. Please save your tired "throwing your vote away" arguements, you're throwing your vote away voting for a tool like Slick Rick or McCan't. Lame Republican't candidates are THE direct cause for Obummer being in office. Really, really? You think there's no difference between Perry and Obama. Slick Rick has his issues but he'd be a hell of a lot better than that Marxist in there now. Hell, my dog would do a better job for the country. Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it? I never said anything remotely close to 'there's no difference between Perry and Obama'. However, if you think Perry is any less corrupt than Maobamma, I have a bridge to sell you. Perry is a spineless any way the wind blows politician. His only loyalty is to his own collossal ego and his bank account. Morons voted for Maobama because they listened to what he said, rather than looking at who he is and what he did. I guess now a whole new crop of morons will vote for Perry for the same reason. Either way, Romney, Perry, Palin, or any of the other limp wrist 'electables' will lose handily to Lord Obummer. I haven't met your dog, but I would vote for him over Governor McHairdo or the Obamanation. Wow, you still can't read, but you can jump through teh intrawebs and give me a psych profile. No wonder Perry always wins! Oh, and BTW, it's you're, not your, Sir Readsalot. 
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Let's see: signed in state tuition for illegal aliens promoted the Trans Texas corridor mandated HPV vaccinations for grade school girls Let the sanctuary cities bill die in the special session because of pressure from two fat cat contributors. Has no problem with gay marriage in other states. Better than Obama, true, but not to be trusted, especially on immigration. Both parties have sold out the public when it comes to immigration. They both know they can't beat the other without the Taco vote. So that makes it ok. No fucking wonder we are where we are as a country. Fuck them all! |
|
I used to be a Republican. The Republican party left me, I didn't leave it.
Perry does not have your best interest at heart. Trans-Tex, forced vaccinations, etc. His best interest is in the mirror. When his lips are moving.....he is lying. IE: Trans-Tex I see NO quality candidate on the Repub side except...................................... Ron Paul. Why you ask? He is real. Listen to him. He speaks the truth. After he finishes speaking and you want to argue his point......................... hard to argue, he speaks the truth whether you like it or not. I loath Odrama! I loath the progressives! Formally the democrats, progressives fits them better I think. I was a democrat when I was young. I now loath the republicans! I give you the latest deficit deal as a prime example of SOS! aka, another fucking for "we the people". I don't want Odrama back in the WH. I'm really tired of voting for the lesser of two evils. Stand by, more pain for America coming to a neighborhood near you soon! YMMV |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'd vote for Perry over Obama. Unfortunately, pretty much every presidential election since 1988 hasn't been about voting for the best candidate, it's been about voting for the lesser of two evils. True. I don't trust any professional politician, but someone who would do what it would take to bring this country back would have no chance of getting elected. With Perry it gives me a few more years to prep. Kinda my thoughts as well. |
|
Quoted:
Let's see: signed in state tuition for illegal aliens promoted the Trans Texas corridor mandated HPV vaccinations for grade school girls Let the sanctuary cities bill die in the special session because of pressure from two fat cat contributors. Has no problem with gay marriage in other states. Better than Obama, true, but not to be trusted, especially on immigration. Add this - He was invited to and attended a Bildaberg meeting. Just one more fact to paint Perry as someone the global elites of this world think of as "one of them". Perry is W recycled, but with dark hair. Obongo vs Perry = Want your dog poop fresh, hot and stinky, or dried out and "less offensive"? If I had my druthers, it would be Ron Paul & Pat Buchanan. The other way around would be fine too - Pat/Ron. I think we all know that aint gonna happen any time soon. So, I think I will probably end up holding my nose and voting for Perry |
|
Quoted:
I used to be a Republican. The Republican party left me, I didn't leave it. Perry does not have your best interest at heart. Trans-Tex, forced vaccinations, etc. His best interest is in the mirror. When his lips are moving.....he is lying. IE: Trans-Tex I see NO quality candidate on the Repub side except...................................... Ron Paul. Why you ask? He is real. Listen to him. He speaks the truth. After he finishes speaking and you want to argue his point......................... hard to argue, he speaks the truth whether you like it or not. I loath Odrama! I loath the progressives! Formally the democrats, progressives fits them better I think. I was a democrat when I was young. I now loath the republicans! I give you the latest deficit deal as a prime example of SOS! aka, another fucking for "we the people". I don't want Odrama back in the WH. I'm really tired of voting for the lesser of two evils. Stand by, more pain for America coming to a neighborhood near you soon! YMMV Ron Paul will never be President. Just the truth. Now I do think his son Rand has a bright political future. Very Conservative-Libertarian views without going overboard like his dad, young and good looking with vigor( have to have those qualities to win the woman vote). |
| If he did run the gloves would come off and the Leftist Obama camp would ask, "Do you really want another religious fanatic from Texas as your President?" Unless Perry has some intelligent, specific rhetoric that will convince American's of an economic turnaround, and mind you Perry is shifty but doesn't have deep intelligence, he has a snowball's chance in hell of winning. |
|
Not to start a war or anything, but Perry sucks. He is nothing but another professional politician who is backed by big business.
We need real people as our politicians. My vote is going for Ron Paul if he runs. He is about a real democracy, real freedom, and basically just an all around good guy. He delivers babies too.  But seriously, he is an honest politician who is all about disbanding the Federal Reserve and bringing greenbacks into our economy again.
Ron Paul for President, Jessie Ventura as Vice P, and Rand Paul as secretary of State, and Chuck Norris as Secretary of Defense. or Offense rather  That will fix America real fucking quick.
|
|
Quoted:
Not to start a war or anything, but Perry sucks. He is nothing but another professional politician who is backed by big business. We need real people as our politicians. My vote is going for Ron Paul if he runs. He is about a real democracy, real freedom, and basically just an all around good guy. He delivers babies too. But seriously, he is an honest politician who is all about disbanding the Federal Reserve and bringing greenbacks into our economy again.
Ron Paul for President, Jessie Ventura as Vice P, and Rand Paul as secretary of State, and Chuck Norris as Secretary of Defense. or Offense rather That will fix America real fucking quick.Dude, Ron Paul is to presidential politics what Scientology is to religion. |
|
Quoted:
I'm really tired of voting for the lesser of two evils. I'm really tired of folks trotting out the old "lesser of two evils" slogan - a sort of liberal-esque moral equivalence which implies that there's little real difference between Dem and GOP candidates. In truth, these candidates have radically different ideologies and agendas. One of our previous "lesser evils" put Samuel Alito and John Roberts on the Supreme Court, set 61 judges on the US Courts of Appeals, and appointed 261 judges to the US district courts. His SC appointments have already secured major victories for gun owners. On the lower courts, some of these judges will be making important legal decisions from a conservative perspective for decades to come. Consequences of electing one "lesser evil": 
Consequences of electing another: 
Don't be trying to tell us that they're roughly the same. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm really tired of voting for the lesser of two evils. I'm really tired of folks trotting out the old "lesser of two evils" slogan - a sort of liberal-esque moral equivalence which implies that there's little real difference between Dem and GOP candidates. In truth, these candidates have radically different ideologies and agendas. One of our previous "lesser evils" put Samuel Alito and John Roberts on the Supreme Court, set 61 judges on the US Courts of Appeals, and appointed 261 judges to the US district courts. His SC appointments have already secured major victories for gun owners. On the lower courts, some of these judges will be making important legal decisions from a conservative perspective for decades to come. Consequences of electing one "lesser evil": http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/3358/robertsalitocomposite.jpg Consequences of electing another: http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/4162/sotomayorkagancomposite.jpg Don't be trying to tell us that they're roughly the same. The ones on the bottom have more chest hair. |
|
Quoted:
Not to start a war or anything, but Perry sucks. He is nothing but another professional politician who is backed by big business. We need real people as our politicians. My vote is going for Ron Paul if he runs. He is about a real democracy, real freedom, and basically just an all around good guy. He delivers babies too. But seriously, he is an honest politician who is all about disbanding the Federal Reserve and bringing greenbacks into our economy again.
Ron Paul for President, Jessie Ventura as Vice P, and Rand Paul as secretary of State, and Chuck Norris as Secretary of Defense. or Offense rather That will fix America real fucking quick.You lost all credibility with the "Jessie Ventura as VP" statement. 
|
|
Quoted:
If he did run the gloves would come off and the Leftist Obama camp would ask, "Do you really want another religious fanatic from Texas as your President?" Unless Perry has some intelligent, specific rhetoric that will convince American's of an economic turnaround, and mind you Perry is shifty but doesn't have deep intelligence, he has a snowball's chance in hell of winning. While I think Romney is the sure homerun, I can definetly see Perry winning. Obamafever has worn off fast and he will be presiding over a stagnant economy at best if not a outright Depression. If the GOP can't win in this climate they never will again. And this country is fubared. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
If he did run the gloves would come off and the Leftist Obama camp would ask, "Do you really want another religious fanatic from Texas as your President?" Unless Perry has some intelligent, specific rhetoric that will convince American's of an economic turnaround, and mind you Perry is shifty but doesn't have deep intelligence, he has a snowball's chance in hell of winning. While I think Romney is the sure homerun, I can definetly see Perry winning. Obamafever has worn off fast and he will be presiding over a stagnant economy at best if not a outright Depression. If the GOP can't win in this climate they never will again. And this country is fubared. Yup. Only this time, ironically in a so called Modern Age, it will be more primitive than the The Great Depression. In the 30's it was red blooded Americans standing in soup lines; dignified, out of work uncles and fathers drifting around the country trying to find a job. But there was still a sense of honor. Now it would be a nationwide Katrina of roving primates. I would vote for Romney over Perry. Perry's grades while attending A&M were just posted on The Austin American Statesman and although the AAS is a Left wing pro Obama rag you can't deny the fact Perry was/is a dumbass. Mostly C's one A, one F and a D in all things, Economics. I think he would be an obstinate thug in the pockets of big business and would no doubt push the Trans Texas cooridor through for a big personal payday. |
|
Quote:
I'm really tired of folks trotting out the old "lesser of two evils" slogan - a sort of liberal-esque moral equivalence which implies that there's little real difference between Dem and GOP candidates. In truth, these candidates have radically different ideologies and agendas. One of our previous "lesser evils" put Samuel Alito and John Roberts on the Supreme Court, set 61 judges on the US Courts of Appeals, and appointed 261 judges to the US district courts. His SC appointments have already secured major victories for gun owners. On the lower courts, some of these judges will be making important legal decisions from a conservative perspective for decades to come. Consequences of electing one "lesser evil": Yes, hind sight is always 20/20. I'm talking about the future evils not the past. It's all a roll of the judgement dice would you not agree? I try to do my due diligence and research any candidate but its very difficult to get a true picture of them. We have to deal with the coming election, not the past. BTW, I'm not any sort of liberal. Call me an independent/libertarian and I'll stand. Even tea party! I'll stand! In my opinion there isn't a nickels worth of difference between the two parties and there lies just one of our problems. When you analyze the dominate parties in the District of Corruption at the end of the day, both sides sit at the same table and laugh at the sheeple, congratulate and toast each other on a job well done! So, be really tired. It's the fact. The sheeple have been choosing the "lesser of evils" for years. |
|
Quoted:
We have to deal with the coming election, not the past. Oh, please.
One party has an established history of seating conservative judges that goes back for at least half a century. The other party has a history of putting kooks on the bench. If you want to ignore history - claim that past behavior provides no clue as to future action - then you're either a fool, a troll, or both. |
|
Quoted: Perry/Rudy 2012. That would be fun to watch. As a death match maybe. I support Rick Perry and I honestly think that his critics are a bunch of crybabies. The opposition to building a new freeway in this state is absolutely insane. Rick Perry has been a great governor and if he runs for President then he has my vote and my support. I just don't know if America will elect W's Lieutenant Governor. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Not to start a war or anything, but Perry sucks. He is nothing but another professional politician who is backed by big business. We need real people as our politicians. My vote is going for Ron Paul if he runs. He is about a real democracy, real freedom, and basically just an all around good guy. He delivers babies too. But seriously, he is an honest politician who is all about disbanding the Federal Reserve and bringing greenbacks into our economy again.
Ron Paul for President, Jessie Ventura as Vice P, and Rand Paul as secretary of State, and Chuck Norris as Secretary of Defense. or Offense rather That will fix America real fucking quick.Dude, Ron Paul is to presidential politics what Scientology is to religion. I respectfully disagree. Scientology is a racket designed to take as much money from it's participants for the express purpose to make it's creator a fabulously wealthy person who founded it as a "religion". Say what you want about Ron Paul, as he may not be everyone's "cup of tea", but he is not in it for the money (unlike 98% of the other politicians who would suck any corporate cock for a campaign contribution or a cushy job and stock options after they retire). Because of this, Ron Paul has zero chance of every being elected President with our current system. Ron Paul is definitely "something different" and I don't agree with many of his positions, but I do respect him as being "Authentic" in saying what he really believes and not faking it for the camera like most politicos. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Perry/Rudy 2012. That would be fun to watch. As a death match maybe. I support Rick Perry and I honestly think that his critics are a bunch of crybabies. The opposition to building a new freeway in this state is absolutely insane. Rick Perry has been a great governor and if he runs for President then he has my vote and my support. I just don't know if America will elect W's Lieutenant Governor. And "W's" replacement... No one can deny that George W. Bush helped rocket Rick Perry to the Texas Governors mansion (at least before it was burned down!) But George W. Bush's legacy is also the strongest force keeping Perry out of the Whitehouse. Talk about your double edged sword? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
We have to deal with the coming election, not the past. Oh, please.
One party has an established history of seating conservative judges that goes back for at least half a century. The other party has a history of putting kooks on the bench. If you want to ignore history - claim that past behavior provides no clue as to future action - then you're either a fool, a troll, or both. Well, one of us is not reading and understanding the others posts! So, please!
SKIbane, I AM NOT A LIBERAL! I want conservative judges! I don't ignore history, I study it and try to learn and live the lesson. I am neither a fool, a troll or either! Please understand that and give me a F*&%^$^G break! (trying my damnedest to not attack a fellow Texan)
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Not to start a war or anything, but Perry sucks. He is nothing but another professional politician who is backed by big business. We need real people as our politicians. My vote is going for Ron Paul if he runs. He is about a real democracy, real freedom, and basically just an all around good guy. He delivers babies too. But seriously, he is an honest politician who is all about disbanding the Federal Reserve and bringing greenbacks into our economy again.
Ron Paul for President, Jessie Ventura as Vice P, and Rand Paul as secretary of State, and Chuck Norris as Secretary of Defense. or Offense rather That will fix America real fucking quick.Dude, Ron Paul is to presidential politics what Scientology is to religion. I respectfully disagree. Scientology is a racket designed to take as much money from it's participants for the express purpose to make it's creator a fabulously wealthy person who founded it as a "religion". Say what you want about Ron Paul, as he may not be everyone's "cup of tea", but he is not in it for the money (unlike 98% of the other politicians who would suck any corporate cock for a campaign contribution or a cushy job and stock options after they retire). Because of this, Ron Paul has zero chance of every being elected President with our current system. Ron Paul is definitely "something different" and I don't agree with many of his positions, but I do respect him as being "Authentic" in saying what he really believes and not faking it for the camera like most politicos. But that's precisely what Ron Paul does. the man fleeces his cultish followers out of huge sums of money while simultaneously griping about pork and loading everything he touches with pork for his district. He's anything but "authentic", and anything but honest about it. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
We have to deal with the coming election, not the past. Oh, please.
One party has an established history of seating conservative judges that goes back for at least half a century. The other party has a history of putting kooks on the bench. If you want to ignore history - claim that past behavior provides no clue as to future action - then you're either a fool, a troll, or both. Which side gave us Stevens, Kennedy, or Souter?  Serious history fail here.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Not to start a war or anything, but Perry sucks. He is nothing but another professional politician who is backed by big business. We need real people as our politicians. My vote is going for Ron Paul if he runs. He is about a real democracy, real freedom, and basically just an all around good guy. He delivers babies too. But seriously, he is an honest politician who is all about disbanding the Federal Reserve and bringing greenbacks into our economy again.
Ron Paul for President, Jessie Ventura as Vice P, and Rand Paul as secretary of State, and Chuck Norris as Secretary of Defense. or Offense rather That will fix America real fucking quick.Dude, Ron Paul is to presidential politics what Scientology is to religion. I respectfully disagree. Scientology is a racket designed to take as much money from it's participants for the express purpose to make it's creator a fabulously wealthy person who founded it as a "religion". Say what you want about Ron Paul, as he may not be everyone's "cup of tea", but he is not in it for the money (unlike 98% of the other politicians who would suck any corporate cock for a campaign contribution or a cushy job and stock options after they retire). Because of this, Ron Paul has zero chance of every being elected President with our current system. Ron Paul is definitely "something different" and I don't agree with many of his positions, but I do respect him as being "Authentic" in saying what he really believes and not faking it for the camera like most politicos. But that's precisely what Ron Paul does. the man fleeces his cultish followers out of huge sums of money while simultaneously griping about pork and loading everything he touches with pork for his district. He's anything but "authentic", and anything but honest about it. Please provide proof to show that Ron Paul personally benefits from campaign contributions, or anything else to prove your wild libel against the man. |