Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
3/12/2009 12:43:22 PM EDT
Texas gov. rejects stimulus money for unemployment

By MONICA RHOR
Associated Press Writer  
Economic Stimulus 2009

HOUSTON (AP) –– Texas Gov. Rick Perry on Thursday rejected $555 million in federal stimulus money that would expand state unemployment benefits, saying the money would have required the state to keep funding the expanded benefits after the stimulus money ran out.

well played Rick!!
3/12/2009 1:21:58 PM EDT
[#1]
3/12/2009 1:42:50 PM EDT
[#2]
Thank you Gov. Perry.
3/12/2009 1:50:01 PM EDT
[#3]
Good political move, especially for the upcoming primary. Little Katie won't have a chance. Of course it would have been better if he rejected the whole damn thing! Now if Chuck gets in the race all bets are off.
3/12/2009 1:56:24 PM EDT
[#4]
Yeah, I've heard much of the money in the Obama save the world stimulus bill that was directed at keeping/creating new jobs was only for 1 year, after that the states/local governments would have to foot the bill.   So unless the states are willing to take on more spending and debt, those jobs will be short lived.
3/12/2009 2:06:27 PM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
Good political move, especially for the upcoming primary. Little Katie won't have a chance. Of course it would have been better if he rejected the whole damn thing! Now if Chuck gets in the race all bets are off.


Chuck wants to run for president of Texas, not gov :)
3/12/2009 3:45:58 PM EDT
[#6]
Thanks, Gov. Perry.
3/12/2009 3:48:44 PM EDT
[#7]
Good, now send back the rest of it and tell the Messiah and THE Queen of Congress to kiss you lilly white ass on the Lincoln Memorial

3/12/2009 3:53:02 PM EDT
[#8]
WOW.  I am suprised.  Good job for a change.
3/12/2009 4:50:52 PM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
Yeah, I've heard much of the money in the Obama save the world stimulus bill that was directed at keeping/creating new jobs was only for 1 year, after that the states/local governments would have to foot the bill.   So unless the states are willing to take on more spending and debt, those jobs will be short lived.

Wasn't that the rub with Clinton's announced plan to put "100,000 cops on the street?" After the first year grant money was gone, all those new cops would need to be paid by the local town/city government, so it became more of a burden to those towns instead of a solution. That's my recollection, anyway.
3/12/2009 4:58:12 PM EDT
[#10]
GeeGee you are correct
3/12/2009 5:00:26 PM EDT
[#11]
From the story I saw on the news tonight, this was mostly just Perry talking big in front of cameras looking good for business's.  Texas congress supposedly is the one with the main say-so over whether the state accepts it or not.