[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Gadaffi captured (Page 1 of 2)
Posted: 10/20/2011 3:30:20 AM EDT
| CNN reporting wounded in both legs....... |
|
Quoted: CNN reporting wounded in both legs.......  |
|
Hiding in a hole yelling "don't shoot, don't shoot" Haha |
|
Quoted: Quoted: It's the risk you have to accept when you start doing terrible things like... trying to establish an alternate trading standard to the US dollar  yeah, or trading oil in Euro's  And suprise surprise, one invasion, a manhunt and a public hanging later, that plan was also quietly dropped |
|
Quoted:
The man was a complete animal, but should execution be condoned  There was never going to be any other outcome once he was captured, but it the Iranians want a democracy, then that should of started with Gaddafis trial.
Your thoughts My thoughts? Well my first thought is that Gaddafi isn't Iranian
|
|
Quoted:
The man was a complete animal, but should execution be condoned There was never going to be any other outcome once he was captured, but it the Iranians want a democracy, then that should of started with Gaddafis trial.
Your thoughts My only thought is what does this have to do with democracy in Iran ? Oh and how his friend Tony Bliar is staying very quiet.............................. 
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
The man was a complete animal, but should execution be condoned There was never going to be any other outcome once he was captured, but it the Iranians want a democracy, then that should of started with Gaddafis trial.
Your thoughts My only thought is what does this have to do with democracy in Iran ? Oh and how his friend Tony Bliar is staying very quiet..............................
so, execution is a democratic solution then is it
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The man was a complete animal, but should execution be condoned There was never going to be any other outcome once he was captured, but it the Iranians want a democracy, then that should of started with Gaddafis trial.
Your thoughts My only thought is what does this have to do with democracy in Iran ? Oh and how his friend Tony Bliar is staying very quiet..............................
so, execution is a democratic solution then is it Actually I reckon summary execution was probably what the majority of the population there wanted. So, in a way yes. At least it avoided a costly trial. |
|
Quoted: So which Western leader gets to claim the gold Browning Hi Power? Will it go on public display or be hidden behind closed doors? Or does it go to the first Libyan prime minister? I reckon it was a gift from an 'ally', maybe it'll be returned to sender What's the betting it has an engraving somewhere.... 'Dearest Muammar, Happy Birthday Love Tony' |
|
looks like five in the chest and two in the head . not a bad group |
|
Quoted:
The RAF just bombed an armed convoy, Gaddafi was captured alive, the RAF wouldn't of topped him then would they Gadaffi was a shit. You cannot go around ordering the murder, beating, maiming and dissapearance of people without incurring the wrath of your victims or their families. In an ideal world he would have been arrested and detained. In the real world he was probably brutally beaten and executed. I am not in the least bit bothered about what happened to him. If it had been my son or father who Gadaffi had ordered killed I'd be rejoicing at Gadaffi's brutal and vengeful slaying. What goes around, comes around. He got what was coming to him. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
The RAF just bombed an armed convoy, Gaddafi was captured alive, the RAF wouldn't of topped him then would they Gadaffi was a shit. You cannot go around ordering the murder, beating, maiming and dissapearance of people without incurring the wrath of your victims or their families. In an ideal world he would have been arrested and detained. In the real world he was probably brutally beaten and executed. I am not in the least bit bothered about what happened to him. If it had been my son or father who Gadaffi had ordered killed I'd be rejoicing at Gadaffi's brutal and vengeful slaying. What goes around, comes around. He got what was coming to him. I agree Phil, but he was being persued with the help of NATO as a dictator who showed no remorse for his attrocities, we should not condone his exercution, when that was the kind of treatment he was being persued for, do we now persue the persuers, if the air strike had killed him, all well and good, it was an armed convoy, and a legitimate target, but his capture and subsequent execution was inevitable, but regretable. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The RAF just bombed an armed convoy, Gaddafi was captured alive, the RAF wouldn't of topped him then would they Gadaffi was a shit. You cannot go around ordering the murder, beating, maiming and dissapearance of people without incurring the wrath of your victims or their families. In an ideal world he would have been arrested and detained. In the real world he was probably brutally beaten and executed. I am not in the least bit bothered about what happened to him. If it had been my son or father who Gadaffi had ordered killed I'd be rejoicing at Gadaffi's brutal and vengeful slaying. What goes around, comes around. He got what was coming to him. I agree Phil, but he was being persued with the help of NATO as a dictator who showed no remorse for his attrocities, we should not condone his exercution, when that was the kind of treatment he was being persued for, do we now persue the persuers, if the air strike had killed him, all well and good, it was an armed convoy, and a legitimate target, but his capture and subsequent execution was inevitable, but regretable. Actually you are slightly wrong here. The NATO mandate was to use airstrikes to protect civilians. The fleeing convoy was not endangering any civilians, so was outside that remit. This is now also being questioned. As for Gaddafi's death, I couldn't care less. Better that he's dead than a rallying point for his resistance (if that exists). Are you turning into a libtard?
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The RAF just bombed an armed convoy, Gaddafi was captured alive, the RAF wouldn't of topped him then would they Gadaffi was a shit. You cannot go around ordering the murder, beating, maiming and dissapearance of people without incurring the wrath of your victims or their families. In an ideal world he would have been arrested and detained. In the real world he was probably brutally beaten and executed. I am not in the least bit bothered about what happened to him. If it had been my son or father who Gadaffi had ordered killed I'd be rejoicing at Gadaffi's brutal and vengeful slaying. What goes around, comes around. He got what was coming to him. I agree Phil, but he was being persued with the help of NATO as a dictator who showed no remorse for his attrocities, we should not condone his exercution, when that was the kind of treatment he was being persued for, do we now persue the persuers, if the air strike had killed him, all well and good, it was an armed convoy, and a legitimate target, but his capture and subsequent execution was inevitable, but regretable. Actually you are slightly wrong here. The NATO mandate was to use airstrikes to protect civilians. The fleeing convoy was not endangering any civilians, so was outside that remit. This is now also being questioned. As for Gaddafi's death, I couldn't care less. Better that he's dead than a rallying point for his resistance (if that exists). Are you turning into a libtard? Nope 
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: The RAF just bombed an armed convoy, Gaddafi was captured alive, the RAF wouldn't of topped him then would they Gadaffi was a shit. You cannot go around ordering the murder, beating, maiming and dissapearance of people without incurring the wrath of your victims or their families. In an ideal world he would have been arrested and detained. In the real world he was probably brutally beaten and executed. I am not in the least bit bothered about what happened to him. If it had been my son or father who Gadaffi had ordered killed I'd be rejoicing at Gadaffi's brutal and vengeful slaying. What goes around, comes around. He got what was coming to him. I agree Phil, but he was being persued with the help of NATO as a dictator who showed no remorse for his attrocities, we should not condone his exercution, when that was the kind of treatment he was being persued for, do we now persue the persuers, if the air strike had killed him, all well and good, it was an armed convoy, and a legitimate target, but his capture and subsequent execution was inevitable, but regretable. Actually you are slightly wrong here. The NATO mandate was to use airstrikes to protect civilians. The fleeing convoy was not endangering any civilians, so was outside that remit. This is now also being questioned. As for Gaddafi's death, I couldn't care less. Better that he's dead than a rallying point for his resistance (if that exists). Are you turning into a libtard? Nope Dead is dead , he needed deadin and he got it , I'm good with it , fucker killed more people than any of us will ever know . |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The RAF just bombed an armed convoy, Gaddafi was captured alive, the RAF wouldn't of topped him then would they Gadaffi was a shit. You cannot go around ordering the murder, beating, maiming and dissapearance of people without incurring the wrath of your victims or their families. In an ideal world he would have been arrested and detained. In the real world he was probably brutally beaten and executed. I am not in the least bit bothered about what happened to him. If it had been my son or father who Gadaffi had ordered killed I'd be rejoicing at Gadaffi's brutal and vengeful slaying. What goes around, comes around. He got what was coming to him. I agree Phil, but he was being persued with the help of NATO as a dictator who showed no remorse for his attrocities, we should not condone his exercution, when that was the kind of treatment he was being persued for, do we now persue the persuers, if the air strike had killed him, all well and good, it was an armed convoy, and a legitimate target, but his capture and subsequent execution was inevitable, but regretable. Nato didn't set out to brutally murder hundreds of thousands of Libyans. Gadaffi did. I undrstand what you are saying. You are questioning the notion that "We kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong" .....which on the face of it seems hypocritical. However, people kill armed tyrants who kill untold numbers of unarmed and defenceless men, women and children. Decent people do not kill innocent people deliberately and malevolently. We condone the killing of once evil person to save the lives of the innocent. There is a hierachy of justification, and along with that goes the animal instinct we refer to as Human nature which is often vengeful and savage towards those who we see as an enemy. I have no problem with that. If Gadaffi didn't want to be hunted, forced to hide in a sewer before being dragged out and executed then he should have exercised his duty as a leader with more compassion, fairness and justice. The last thing I am going to do is hold a soldier accountable fory slaying a murderer when we have failed to bring Gadaffi to justice for 42 years. Fuck him...he had a hand in Lockerbie, he supplied the IRA with semtex that was used to kill our troops and innocent civilians. He got what was coming and I hope he lived long enough to feel the pain earned for the suffering he had caused to hundreds and thousands of people. There's a lesson in that for all leaders. |
|
Funny, I thought he had put the past behind him and become a friend of the west.
I seem to recall Mr Blair shaking his hand not so long ago.
If he was such a cunt, why did we have anything to do with him at all ? Gadaffi I mean. Though come to think of it......................................Blair was a bit of a shit too. |
|
Quoted:
Funny, I thought he had put the past behind him and become a friend of the west. I seem to recall Mr Blair shaking his hand not so long ago.
If he was such a cunt, why did we have anything to do with him at all ? Yeah...Mr Blair was known for his impeccable judgement.
|
|
Quoted:
Funny, I thought he had put the past behind him and become a friend of the west. I seem to recall Mr Blair shaking his hand not so long ago.
If he was such a cunt, why did we have anything to do with him at all ? Gadaffi I mean. Though come to think of it......................................Blair was a bit of a shit too. I remember Obama shaking his hand IIRC
|
|
Quoted: As for Gaddafi's death, I couldn't care less. Better that he's dead than a rallying point for his resistance (if that exists). Hussein, Bin Laden, etc - politically they cannot be allowed to live, even in prison, because they become a poison pill or rallying point. Whether we like it or not (and I'd generally prefer to see a proper trial) it would have happened by someone's hand, and probably sooner rather than later. I'm sure that plenty of people in the South African government would have been happy if Mandela had been killed instead of captured. In fact, I'm fairly certain that the South African intelligence guys tried to engineer an escape attempt so that he could have been "shot while trying to escape". |