Posted: 1/21/2011 9:27:16 AM EDT
|
If it will outshoot my 6.5 x 47 then , yes John.
To be honest, i,ve built it purely as a demonstrator, to show the action, paintwork etc, when i,m out and about. I wanted to build a "true " tactical rifle. Its had the best of everything, so it ought to shoot. I intend feeding this the 139 scenar if it likes them. I like their BC. |
|
Its a rem footprint Phil. The similarities end there.
Action is stainless steel, so is the .20 moa rail, and bolt handle and knob. Bolt shaft is chrome moly. Bolt tolerances are specifiable on order. It can have repeater tolerances or benchrest tolerances. A straightforward 2 lug design, with a sako extractor and rem ejector and firing pin assembly and shroud. Bolt is fluted for crap removal and looks obviously. The action has far more " meat" inside it than a remmy, none of it has been machined out for weight. The ejection and magazine ports are as small as possible to make it all stronger, but still allow normal function.The recoil lug is oversize and is pinned to the action at the 6 o clock position. Tenon is 1.072" x 16 tpi. Rail screws are m4 instead of the weedy yank threads on a remmy. Side bolt release. Serial number on the inside of the ejection port. This is to stop people machining the action down to remove names and numbers, and rebadging them as their own. Tactical bolt knob , or straightforward teardrop. Available in short action repeater, or single shot, in right or left hand. Available in long action repeater, or single shot, in right or left hand. Available in any bolt face too. Made in Yorkshire. |
|
Quoted:
Stops people screwing remington, and aftermarket pre chambered shite onto it Mark . I will not support the butchers and messers in the UK industry. Sorry to tell you but that won't stop it. To do that you should've gone the other way. They can still screw a factory barrel in and it will be a little loose but will still work, and believe it or not, work well. It's a nice Looking action though but would look even better with Bradley Arms on it
|
|
I,ve seen that done too Mark, and you are right, they will nip up, and shoot. Infact, after seeing some of the absolute junk put together from different places, it never ceases to amaze me just how bad a rifle can be, and STILL shoot.
I made a token gesture really. The prototypes were 1.062" x 18 tpi. This would have stopped the idiots, but it also caused problems for me. I,m used to the 16 pitch, and how it "feels" in a barrel vise and wrench. The 18 pitch had so much more "give " in it. It was a nightmare to time up flutes accuratly with it. After half a dozen difficult, time consuming jobs, i changed the spec to 16 pitch, and pinned the recoil lug. That makes no difference to the customer, but a lot of help to the smith.Mainly from the bedding/painting viewpoint. |
|
Personally I would've gone with integral lug as that would give a longer thread tenon and a STD thickness lug at that.
I don't see how a thicker lug can have any advantage as the guns don't beat the lug up that much, in my opinion. Also it makes for less work when fitting to the stock as the lug slot doesn't need modifying. Simple on a AICS but a pain on a HS, although slightly less so on a McMillan etc, but a pain none the less |
|
Yep, quite true Mark. The reason we went with a thicker lug, is that all the aftermarket ones that are any good, ie, surface ground and holed for a pin....are oversized. I get them from PTG, however, i will be having them made here shortly.
Regarding a fixed lug and rail....watch this space.....the prototype will be unveiled at the Newark show.... |








