Posted: 6/30/2008 6:32:47 PM EDT
| If this was real link would it break any laws or just scare people? |
That's one of the best vids I've seen in a long time. I like how the end he flips it around on his finger...nothing like having a loaded gun pointed right back at your chest  "blah blah ma dubglaaack" "lemme demstrate ma dubglaaack" bwuauahahahha I bet Carolyn McCarthy and her "shoulder thing that goes up" are freaking OUT!!! |
This configuration would break no laws AFAIK. It however may help Darwin's law of natural selection. |
|
As soon as he used the other "glaaack" as a forward grip, he has created an AOW without filing the proper NFA paperwork and paying the $200 tax. However, I do kinda like the flipping with the second arrangement. Oh, and you do realize those were airsoft guns, right? |
Carolyn McCarthy: "....it also would have had banned the large capacity clips...." Man, I bet Garand shooters everywhere are just drooling at the thought of a >8 round clip for their M1s. 
|
It's mounted off the magazine, its no more a fore grip than 33round glock magazines I see the wannabegangbangers wielding at Crossfire. |
I believe he was referring to the mag mount for the forward rail, wherein using the second pistol as a VFG created a defacto AOW aside from the fact that it was Airsoft.....
|
It was not designed to be and (presumably) not intended to be used as a forward grip. Over on the AR15 Pistol board, someone posted a letter from ATF stating that a buffer tube on an AR pistol was not a shoulder stock, even if it could be rested against the shoulder. Since it was designed as a buffer tube, and not as a stock they reason it is not a stock. I would think the goofy "mag holder" would be similar. Of course, that's applying logic to ATF opinions, and you know how well that works out. |