Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
12/27/2006 6:40:07 AM EDT
Due to events that happened recently I'm looking to take the conceal and carry class.

www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=530643


A quick Google search came up with this place.

www.mntactics.com/Classes.html

anyone been through their class?

who would you recommend?

My wife is pregnant and my major concern right now is that i might run into this guy in town while she is with, i want a back up plan if something escalates and we are forced to engage.


12/27/2006 7:16:14 AM EDT
[#1]
Defensive Edge has one going on the 30th if that is soon enuff!

But a good peper spray or a tazer are things that you are more likely to use, without mounds of leagal proplems!
12/27/2006 7:40:38 AM EDT
[#2]
i've been looking into tazers but i don't think they will penetrate jackets.
pepper spray would be an option but that could backfire like everything else.
might just have to get them all and use whatever the situation deems necessary.
12/27/2006 7:58:50 AM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:
use whatever the situation deems necessary.


Bingo.
12/27/2006 8:31:56 AM EDT
[#4]
These guys are my friends and good instructors when it comes to MN CCW law.  It's a good carry permit course.

If you want a carry permit course with more practical shooting instruction, Defensive Edge's class is great.

Personally, I'd recommend taking both because there is not much cross over between the two.  Either way, you should take the class and take more training!

Good luck!
12/27/2006 8:48:23 AM EDT
[#5]
who are " these guys" ?  did i miss something?

i just read through Defensive edge's handgun 1 course.  I wonder if they go over the handgun laws or if its a more tactical based training.
12/27/2006 8:59:42 AM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:
who are " these guys" ?  did i miss something?

i just read through Defensive edge's handgun 1 course.  I wonder if they go over the handgun laws or if its a more tactical based training.


Handgun 1 satisfies the MN law for CCW permits, covering laws and some scenarios.

The class (handgun 1) is not as much tactics as it is fundamentals. Make sure you get a good grounding in fundamentals before moving to tactics. If you don't, you will spend a lot of time breaking bad habits (like me).
12/27/2006 9:06:05 AM EDT
[#7]
If you identify one or two classes, I suggest you contact the instructor and talk about the class and your training goals. That way you can get the best fit for your needs.  

All instructors should be highly approachable.
12/27/2006 9:21:52 AM EDT
[#8]
Thanks Blue.

right now i'm have a some what heated discussion with the wife about the CCW.

why do women seem to lay down in the face of danger and not stand up and defend.

its driving me up a fucking wall!
12/27/2006 9:25:28 AM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:
Thanks Blue.

right now i'm have a some what heated discussion with the wife about the CCW.

why do women seem to lay down in the face of danger and not stand up and defend.

its driving me up a fucking wall!


I deal with this daily.

They cannot be mad forever.
12/27/2006 9:44:03 AM EDT
[#10]
out of sight, out of mind...
12/27/2006 10:14:12 AM EDT
[#11]
My wife is usually very easy going, but try to hurt or threaten one of her children and she becomes a Momma Bear protecting her Cubs.  Your wife might have the same motivator once you have a little one.  As far as courses, there are many to choose from.  After reading about your run in, there are many courses that would possibly apply.  The basis first it to get solid fundamental of pistol handling skills, as it is fundamentals that are required in order to employ when using proper tactics.  All the tactics in the world probably won't do much good if you cannot hit with your firearm upon demand when required.  

Our Handgun-1 course covers the legalities, plus we spend about 5 hours on the range working on solid handgun fundamentals.  Those who successfully pass our Handgun-1 course may apply for a carry permit.  For other courses I might suggest Defense Alternatives which will cover all types of other force options and tactics.  You should also consider our Gunfighting While Protecting Others course, as this will teach you what to do when your wife and children are present.  Another course to consider is a Gunfighting From & Around Vehicles course.

CY6
Greg Sullivan "Sully"
Chief Instructor
SLR15 Rifles
TheDefensiveEdge.com
 
12/27/2006 10:17:06 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:
Thanks Blue.

right now i'm have a some what heated discussion with the wife about the CCW.

why do women seem to lay down in the face of danger and not stand up and defend.

its driving me up a fucking wall!


You're working with a truncated timetable but your wife will eventually warm up to the idea of you being armed, especially when she realizes it's in her best interest.  It took my wife a couple years but she's used to and comforted by the idea that I am always armed.  

My hint would be to not push hard in discussions, but take opportune times to remind her that carry is a good idea when you live in a society like ours.  I find the 10 o'clock news provides almost daily examples of why you need to carry all the time.  Danger can find you anywhere (although some areas are more likely than others).

If your wife will absolutely not allow you to carry, there are alternatives.  Here are some suggestions for you:

1) carry GOOD pepper spray, like Fox 5.3
2) carry a good flashlight, especially if you are going to out at night
3) vary your daily routines.
4) learn to live your life in condition yellow.  

The last one is the most important.  Most people live in condition white.  That means they are not very observant of what's going on around them, and danger usually surprises them.  You'd be surprised how quickly your "little voice" will tune you in to telling you when you should be somewhere else.  Some things to that point:

-Meet oncoming people with your eyes.  Do not be afraid to lock or "engage" someone visually so they are aware of you knowing they're there.
-Walk with your head up, scanning your surroundings.  Most people look at the ground when they walk.
-Avoid entering areas with single escape routes.  Parking ramps and lots are areas where this commonly occurs.  


After having changed my lifestyle to be much more observant I will tell you that knowing what's going on around me at all times is a much more comforting feeling than being armed.


Just some food for thought.  If you have an immediate thread identified, like it sounds like you do, contact the authorities.  Better to be proactive on that one.

 
12/27/2006 10:54:40 AM EDT
[#13]
Thanks for the advice FAST.  
i'm pretty aware of my surrounding 95% of the time.  i'm the type of person that hates having their back to the crowd or a door.  The subtle hints and feelings you get about certain things has saved me from various incidents, go with your gut feeling and not blow it off.


SLR15 check your pm's.
12/28/2006 5:46:22 AM EDT
[#14]
height=8
Quoted:
Due to events that happened recently I'm looking to take the conceal and carry class.

www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=530643


A quick Google search came up with this place.

www.mntactics.com/Classes.html

anyone been through their class?

who would you recommend?

My wife is pregnant and my major concern right now is that i might run into this guy in town while she is with, i want a back up plan if something escalates and we are forced to engage.


There's lots of good choices, depending on your level of experience and interest.  I'd second the advice to contact the individual instructors; my own take, fwiw, is that the instructor is a lot more important than the "brand."

Ask about what they teach, and what they don't.  I don't see how it's possible to responsibly cover the legal portion alone in less than an hour and a half without skimping -- there's not only the statutes and the principles that come out of case law, but issues of what to do -- and not to do -- in the wake of the use or threat of lethal force.  If you already know how to shoot, that's probably going to be a lot more important than a review of Weaver vs. Isosceles.  

As to the specific class you mention, I try (sometimes successfully) to avoid either criticizing or praising how other instructors do things without having sat through at least much of their classes -- and since I haven't sat through any of his, I don't have an opinion about how he teaches. <Contenet removed as we do not alloww unpaid advertising on this site. ---dpmmn>
12/28/2006 6:16:41 AM EDT
[#15]
I really have to suggest that you shop wisely.  There are good and bad instructors.  Most of the instructors only came into being because of the law, and the ability to make a quick buck.  Sad but very true!

I hope that you choose your training based on the instructor and their experience with teaching.  

I sure can vouch for Defensive Edge classes, Greg Sullivan is a great instructor.  I have to conceed that if McNeilsen vouches for the company that you googled then he knows of what he speaks.

There are just way too many people that are out to take your money!

12/28/2006 7:02:19 AM EDT
[#16]
The carry class I attended they allowed my spouse to attend as well at no charge (unless she wanted to get her permit paperwork as well then she would have to pay).  

After sitting through it and hearing more information about carrying from someone other than myself even if it was the same things I had been telling her... she saw the value in it and now we spend nearly twice as much money and time on firearms and training.
12/28/2006 10:15:25 AM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Due to events that happened recently I'm looking to take the conceal and carry class.

www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=530643


A quick Google search came up with this place.

www.mntactics.com/Classes.html

anyone been through their class?

who would you recommend?

My wife is pregnant and my major concern right now is that i might run into this guy in town while she is with, i want a back up plan if something escalates and we are forced to engage.


There's lots of good choices, depending on your level of experience and interest.  I'd second the advice to contact the individual instructors; my own take, fwiw, is that the instructor is a lot more important than the "brand."

Ask about what they teach, and what they don't.  I don't see how it's possible to responsibly cover the legal portion alone in less than an hour and a half without skimping -- there's not only the statutes and the principles that come out of case law, but issues of what to do -- and not to do -- in the wake of the use or threat of lethal force.  If you already know how to shoot, that's probably going to be a lot more important than a review of Weaver vs. Isosceles. 1.I have not used either of these stances since I took my first class several years ago! 2.alot of people say they know how to shoot, but I find  gunfighting is a whole different matter entirely!3. I don't need anymore than 2hrs to cover the leagal portion of the law it is very straight forward and common sense! If you don't get it in that amount of time you have no right to carry.

As to the specific class you mention, I try (sometimes successfully) to avoid either criticizing or praising how other instructors do thingsbut it sounds to me like you just did that that makes me not want to attend any of you classes without having sat through at least much of their classes -- and since I haven't sat through any of his, I don't have an opinion about how he teaches. <Contenet removed as we do not alloww unpaid advertising on this site. ---dpmmn>


PS a taser curent will travel through 2in of clothing and when you hit is much more effective than a handgun round! ask me how I know.
12/28/2006 10:29:27 AM EDT
[#18]
spit it out... i could use a good laugh.

12/28/2006 10:36:04 AM EDT
[#19]
will someone post my mr Bill impression photo!   NOOOOOOOOOOO!
12/28/2006 10:55:51 AM EDT
[#20]
Tag
12/28/2006 12:39:26 PM EDT
[#21]
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
Due to events that happened recently I'm looking to take the conceal and carry class.

www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=530643


A quick Google search came up with this place.

www.mntactics.com/Classes.html

anyone been through their class?

who would you recommend?

My wife is pregnant and my major concern right now is that i might run into this guy in town while she is with, i want a back up plan if something escalates and we are forced to engage.


There's lots of good choices, depending on your level of experience and interest.  I'd second the advice to contact the individual instructors; my own take, fwiw, is that the instructor is a lot more important than the "brand."

Ask about what they teach, and what they don't.  I don't see how it's possible to responsibly cover the legal portion alone in less than an hour and a half without skimping -- there's not only the statutes and the principles that come out of case law, but issues of what to do -- and not to do -- in the wake of the use or threat of lethal force.  If you already know how to shoot, that's probably going to be a lot more important than a review of Weaver vs. Isosceles. 1.I have not used either of these stances since I took my first class several years ago!
Thank you for sharing that.
height=8
2.alot of people say they know how to shoot, but I find  gunfighting is a whole different matter entirely!
I'm sure that's true.  I'm fortunate enough never to have been involved in a gunfight -- although I've had more than one DGU -- and will happily defer to your experience in actual gunfighting, whatever that experience may be.
height=8
3. I don't need anymore than 2hrs to cover the leagal portion of the law it is very straight forward and common sense! If you don't get it in that amount of time you have no right to carry.
Well, actually, that turns out not to be the case; the MCPPA doesn't specify the maximum amount of time one may spend on studying the law around firearms and self-defense.  In my experience, how long it takes depends on the interest and experience of the people taking the class -- it tends to go somewhat longer than that if they're lawyers or LEO folks involved, as they often want to go into issues in somewhat greater depth than most, particularly around the subtleties of the different statutes for use of force by LEOs vs. non-LEOs, some of the implications of "defense of dwelling", the unsettled case law on "reasonable" force in "citizens arrest", and the even-more-unsettled case law on defense of others.
height=8


As to the specific class you mention, I try (sometimes successfully) to avoid either criticizing or praising how other instructors do thingsbut it sounds to me like you just did that
I'm so sorry that you misinterpreted what I said.
height=8


that makes me not want to attend any of you classes
I think that's probably best, all in all, and I'm comfortable with that.
height=8
without having sat through at least much of their classes -- and since I haven't sat through any of his, I don't have an opinion about how he teaches. <Contenet removed as we do not alloww unpaid advertising on this site. ---dpmmn>

Sorry; I didn't mean confuse anybody. As to why I would "advertise" for a competitor of mine, I'll just raise a curious eyebrow and smile tolerantly and perhaps a touch superciliously at the notion; I was just stating a fact, rather than trying to promote a given instructor who I only know casually.  Just to be clear:  I have no desire either to promote his classes nor, err, sully his reputation, and am sorry that anybody for whatever reason, either thought otherwise, or affected to think otherwise..
height=8

PS a taser curent will travel through 2in of clothing and when you hit is much more effective than a handgun round!how
I'm not overly curious, actually.

As to advertising, I've already politely declined an overt offer to advertise on this website, and will now decline your implicit one; if the website owners would like to invite Mr. Martin (I do hope that mentioning his name won't be misconstrued as "advertising"!) to advertise here, I'm sure they can find his email address.

As to the law of self-defense in Minnesota being "straight forward (sic)", I guess we're going to have to disagree, given the implications of Pendleton, Glowacki, et al, and particularly McCuiston, and the all-too-frequently-changing landscape.  (Of course, if you're comparing it to self-defense law in Missouri, perhaps you have a point.)  But perhaps I'm finding complications where you wouldn't -- then again, I have written the (so far, if only by process of elimination) definitive book on legal carry in Minnesota and Missouri and done certified CLE for both MN and ND lawyers and cops on such matters, so perhaps you might want to consider the possibility that I'm right.

Or not; no problem, either way.

We're also apparently going to have to disagree about whether two hours is longer than an hour and a half. :)  (I don't make this stuff up, you know.)

As to "gunfighting," I doubt that's something that's likely to be a good thing to worry about learning in an introductory carry class until one's got the basics of self-defense law down, and probably can't be learned -- assuming its desirable to learn it -- in a single class.   Walk before you try to fly, and all, and don't expect to learn how to fly in a six-hour class that has to cover a lot of other stuff.  
12/28/2006 12:43:09 PM EDT
[#22]
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
Due to events that happened recently I'm looking to take the conceal and carry class.

www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=530643


A quick Google search came up with this place.

www.mntactics.com/Classes.html

anyone been through their class?

who would you recommend?

My wife is pregnant and my major concern right now is that i might run into this guy in town while she is with, i want a back up plan if something escalates and we are forced to engage.


There's lots of good choices, depending on your level of experience and interest.  I'd second the advice to contact the individual instructors; my own take, fwiw, is that the instructor is a lot more important than the "brand."

Ask about what they teach, and what they don't.  I don't see how it's possible to responsibly cover the legal portion alone in less than an hour and a half without skimping -- there's not only the statutes and the principles that come out of case law, but issues of what to do -- and not to do -- in the wake of the use or threat of lethal force.  If you already know how to shoot, that's probably going to be a lot more important than a review of Weaver vs. Isosceles.  

As to the specific class you mention, I try (sometimes successfully) to avoid either criticizing or praising how other instructors do things without having sat through at least much of their classes -- and since I haven't sat through any of his, I don't have an opinion about how he teaches. <Contenet removed as we do not alloww unpaid advertising on this site. ---dpmmn>
Again, just to be clear:  I'm not interested in whether or not you'd allow me to "advertise" another instructor who is a competitor of mine; I wouldn't care to.  I'd prefer that you not attempt to, err, sully any reputations by suggesting otherwise, but, well, one doesn't always get what one prefers.

Hope that clears that up for you.  Hope does spring eternal.
12/28/2006 1:06:30 PM EDT
[#23]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Due to events that happened recently I'm looking to take the conceal and carry class.




There's lots of good choices, depending on your level of experience and interest.  I'd second the advice to contact the individual instructors; my own take, fwiw, is that the instructor is a lot more important than the "brand."



As to the law of self-defense in Minnesota being "straight forward (sic)", I guess we're going to have to disagree, given the implications of Pendleton, Glowacki, et al, and particularly McCuiston, and the all-too-frequently-changing landscape.  (Of course, if you're comparing it to self-defense law in Missouri, perhaps you have a point.)  But perhaps I'm finding complications where you wouldn't -- then again, I have written the (so far, if only by process of elimination) definitive book on legal carry in Minnesota and Missouri and done certified CLE for both MN and ND lawyers and cops on such matters, so perhaps you might want to consider the possibility that I'm right.

 All abord the ego train toot toot my own horn
12/28/2006 1:27:57 PM EDT
[#24]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Due to events that happened recently I'm looking to take the conceal and carry class.

www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=530643


A quick Google search came up with this place.

www.mntactics.com/Classes.html

anyone been through their class?

who would you recommend?

My wife is pregnant and my major concern right now is that i might run into this guy in town while she is with, i want a back up plan if something escalates and we are forced to engage.


There's lots of good choices, depending on your level of experience and interest.  I'd second the advice to contact the individual instructors; my own take, fwiw, is that the instructor is a lot more important than the "brand."

Ask about what they teach, and what they don't.  I don't see how it's possible to responsibly cover the legal portion alone in less than an hour and a half without skimping -- there's not only the statutes and the principles that come out of case law, but issues of what to do -- and not to do -- in the wake of the use or threat of lethal force.  If you already know how to shoot, that's probably going to be a lot more important than a review of Weaver vs. Isosceles. 1.I have not used either of these stances since I took my first class several years ago!
Thank you for sharing that.

2.alot of people say they know how to shoot, but I find  gunfighting is a whole different matter entirely!
I'm sure that's true.  I'm fortunate enough never to have been involved in a gunfight -- although I've had more than one DGU -- and will happily defer to your experience in actual gunfighting, whatever that experience may be.

3. I don't need anymore than 2hrs to cover the leagal portion of the law it is very straight forward and common sense! If you don't get it in that amount of time you have no right to carry.
Well, actually, that turns out not to be the case; the MCPPA doesn't specify the maximum amount of time one may spend on studying the law around firearms and self-defense.  In my experience, how long it takes depends on the interest and experience of the people taking the class -- it tends to go somewhat longer than that if they're lawyers or LEO folks involved, as they often want to go into issues in somewhat greater depth than most, particularly around the subtleties of the different statutes for use of force by LEOs vs. non-LEOs, some of the implications of "defense of dwelling", the unsettled case law on "reasonable" force in "citizens arrest", and the even-more-unsettled case law on defense of others.



As to the specific class you mention, I try (sometimes successfully) to avoid either criticizing or praising how other instructors do thingsbut it sounds to me like you just did that
I'm so sorry that you misinterpreted what I said.



that makes me not want to attend any of you classes
I think that's probably best, all in all, and I'm comfortable with that.

without having sat through at least much of their classes -- and since I haven't sat through any of his, I don't have an opinion about how he teaches. <Contenet removed as we do not alloww unpaid advertising on this site. ---dpmmn>

Sorry; I didn't mean confuse anybody. As to why I would "advertise" for a competitor of mine, I'll just raise a curious eyebrow and smile tolerantly and perhaps a touch superciliously at the notion; I was just stating a fact, rather than trying to promote a given instructor who I only know casually.  Just to be clear:  I have no desire either to promote his classes nor, err, sully his reputation, and am sorry that anybody for whatever reason, either thought otherwise, or affected to think otherwise..


PS a taser curent will travel through 2in of clothing and when you hit is much more effective than a handgun round! ask me how I know.
I'm not overly curious, actually.

As to advertising, I've already politely declined an overt offer to advertise on this website, and will now decline your implicit one; if the website owners would like to invite Mr. Martin (I do hope that mentioning his name won't be misconstrued as "advertising"!) to advertise here, I'm sure they can find his email address.

As to the law of self-defense in Minnesota being "straight forward (sic)", I guess we're going to have to disagree, given the implications of Pendleton, Glowacki, et al, and particularly McCuiston, and the all-too-frequently-changing landscape.  (Of course, if you're comparing it to self-defense law in Missouri, perhaps you have a point.)  But perhaps I'm finding complications where you wouldn't -- then again, I have written the (so far, if only by process of elimination) definitive book on legal carry in Minnesota and Missouri and done certified CLE for both MN and ND lawyers and cops on such matters, so perhaps you might want to consider the possibility that I'm right.

Or not; no problem, either way.

We're also apparently going to have to disagree about whether two hours is longer than an hour and a half. :)  (I don't make this stuff up, you know.)

As to "gunfighting," I doubt that's something that's likely to be a good thing to worry about learning in an introductory carry class until one's got the basics of self-defense law down, and probably can't be learned -- assuming its desirable to learn it -- in a single class.   Walk before you try to fly, and all, and don't expect to learn how to fly in a six-hour class that has to cover a lot of other stuff.  
Ok then
12/28/2006 1:39:21 PM EDT
[#25]
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Due to events that happened recently I'm looking to take the conceal and carry class.




There's lots of good choices, depending on your level of experience and interest.  I'd second the advice to contact the individual instructors; my own take, fwiw, is that the instructor is a lot more important than the "brand."



As to the law of self-defense in Minnesota being "straight forward (sic)", I guess we're going to have to disagree, given the implications of Pendleton, Glowacki, et al, and particularly McCuiston, and the all-too-frequently-changing landscape.  (Of course, if you're comparing it to self-defense law in Missouri, perhaps you have a point.)  But perhaps I'm finding complications where you wouldn't -- then again, I have written the (so far, if only by process of elimination) definitive book on legal carry in Minnesota and Missouri and done certified CLE for both MN and ND lawyers and cops on such matters, so perhaps you might want to consider the possibility that I'm right.

 All abord the ego train toot toot my own horn
I'm terribly sorry if that bothers you, but, as they say: "no brag, just fact."  

(Actually, writing a book is easy -- you can ask just about anybody who hasn't done it, and they'll tell you.)
12/28/2006 2:00:08 PM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Due to events that happened recently I'm looking to take the conceal and carry class.




There's lots of good choices, depending on your level of experience and interest.  I'd second the advice to contact the individual instructors; my own take, fwiw, is that the instructor is a lot more important than the "brand."



As to the law of self-defense in Minnesota being "straight forward (sic)", I guess we're going to have to disagree, given the implications of Pendleton, Glowacki, et al, and particularly McCuiston, and the all-too-frequently-changing landscape.  (Of course, if you're comparing it to self-defense law in Missouri, perhaps you have a point.)  But perhaps I'm finding complications where you wouldn't -- then again, I have written the (so far, if only by process of elimination) definitive book on legal carry in Minnesota and Missouri and done certified CLE for both MN and ND lawyers and cops on such matters, so perhaps you might want to consider the possibility that I'm right.

 All abord the ego train toot toot my own horn
I'm terribly sorry if that bothers you, but, as they say: "no brag, just fact."  

(Actually, writing a book is easy -- you can ask just about anybody who hasn't done it, and they'll tell you.)


I am writeing a book it is called ego maniacs and why they think they are important and feel the need to tell you so! I was wondering if I could interview you!  
12/28/2006 2:01:10 PM EDT
[#27]
Well this thread went in the Crapper.
12/28/2006 2:08:42 PM EDT
[#28]

Quoted:
Well this thread went in the Crapper.


They all (on this topic) seem to.
12/28/2006 4:49:48 PM EDT
[#29]
Good thing we're all on the same side and not fighting over a few pitiful training dollars.    
12/28/2006 4:58:40 PM EDT
[#30]
Well, in an effort to pull this out of the crapper, here goes.  I have taken several courses from Sully and have enjoyed them and learned a great deal.  Lessons which are employed in everyday life and every time I shoot.  My wife also recently graduated the Handgun 1 class and is a changed person after the class.  She has applied for her CCW and is now competing in IPSC.  Just as practice with your weapon(s) is an absolute must, so is new training and education.  I'm sure most all would agree, one class does not make an expert.  Education. Training. Practice.  What you do in training/practice will be reflected 100% when a bad situation arrises and the presure is on.  Education helps to keep you out of bad situations (hopefully).  I will be the first one to say that I need more training and a great deal more education.  I just need to find more time, I seemed to have misplaced all my time and can't find it.  Anyone have any extra they want to sell?
See ya at the range (or at class...yes Sully, I got the message!)
Sleepy
12/28/2006 5:18:35 PM EDT
[#31]
for shits and giggles i stopped by GS today.. or where they use to be located.
went over to the new place and i felt LOST being able to walk around and not bump into stuff or have to squeeze by people in the aisles.  I have to say they did a HUGE step in the right direction by moving to that new location.

I haven't been in there in a while, did Howards old dog pass away?  I noticed he had what looked to be a spaniel puppy.  
12/28/2006 5:49:23 PM EDT
[#32]
Joel smoked you all.
12/28/2006 5:52:44 PM EDT
[#33]
how about we put the egos and name calling away and get this thread back on track.



mmmmmmmkay.

mike
12/28/2006 7:44:50 PM EDT
[#34]
 This thread has REALLY gone in the crapper...

Thank you for chiming in TBS!  Those who know me personally know I've got little if any ego, and I'm an expert in jack-shit...  That said, I'll chime in with my $0.02...

As previously stated by Sleepy717, It's all about Education.  Training.  And Practice.

Diversifying one's Training & Education is a good thing.  One can never have enough...

I do know an author quite well, but I'll keep his opinions on fictional writing to myself as that's off-topic.

I've not yet read Joel's authoritative book on the subject.  Yet the attitude toward potential consumers, and those who HAVE read his book or taken his course seems a bit disdainful and disconcerting.

If anything we should be seeking the professional opinions of various Minnesota Judges, Lawyers, and other Professionals to assess their take and interpretation of Minnesota Concealed Carry Law to get a consensus on the grey areas of legislation and case law.  Maybe an Author could be a decent source for this information... And maybe due to a derisive attitude...  Who knows, but I don't claim to know everything...

Likewise we should be seeking the best handgun and self-defense training we can find and reasonably afford in order to break bad habits, learn more effective and efficient deployment of defensive measures (Both Lethal and Non-Lethal), shooting under stress.

Then one must contemplate which source would be the best for this aspect of self-defense training...  Professionals in the line of duty that have been utilizing, instructing, and refining self-defense and handgun tactics, and use of force applications for years, or any ordinary person that got an NRA and/or AAFCI cert.?  IMHO, We should not only be practicing as much as possible on our own, but we should be practicing by RETAKING courses with good instructors (this is the whole concept of Tactical Tuesdays & Defensive Edge Alumni Courses: continued, regular training & practice), and attending regular practice sessions with instructors present so you do not resort back to previously learned (or develop new) bad habits or defensive tactics.


SO MY FINAL OPINION ON TRAINING IS THIS:  Diversify your training!
1.)  Take courses with multiple instructors to learn their varying views on the laws, their varying defensive use of firearms, and their shooting methods.
2.)  Judge the quality/level of their instruction, and frequent the instructor(s) that you feel are most beneficial to your continued development and retention of defensive shooting skills.

** Once you've taken a course or two to learn the laws, the laws aren't going to change very much over time, as are the proper applications of force.**

Once you learn those base things you can seek the training that you may deem the best to hone the skills needed to apply the proper levels of force.  One can learn that better with a more established and reputable instructor than the numerous 'johnny come lately' vultures instructors that have come on the scene since the Law was passed.

That is exactly what I had done, and I'll continue to take more training courses to further hone my skills, knowledge, tactics, and the foundations they are built upon.  I've attended Defensive Edge courses, and those of various other instructors.  I'm also going to continue taking courses with other instructors (such as Bills GS, Tactical Tuesday, etc., as time & $$ allows), and thus far after trying a few instructors I've kept coming back to D.E.


On the last note from SavageSlackie...  The dog DIED!?!?!?  Can anyone confirm this???  It probably had a heart attack seeing how much room there was to wander around in the new store!    I haven't been there yet, but will be going sometime in the next month or two to hopefully pick up a 1911 and some tumbling media for reloading.
12/28/2006 7:49:08 PM EDT
[#35]

Quoted:
Joel smoked you all.




12/28/2006 8:03:34 PM EDT
[#36]
i don't know if it died or not, i was just asking because it is usually there and he had a puppy in there this time.

I went in to look at a compact XD and another magazine for my 10mm.  i'm headed back there tomorrow to pick up some ammo and i'll ask Howard then.

now back to the subject.  I'm in the process of trying to get some sort of official background check done on myself so i fulfill the Credential Category 1 for Defensive Edges Registration.

I believe i will have to talk to someone at the BCA and have them do it because the local Sherrifs office said that they would have to have Defensive Edge send in a background check request on me.  (The way i read DE's site i have to obtain those credentials myself.)

12/28/2006 8:32:12 PM EDT
[#37]

Quoted:
i don't know if it died or not, i was just asking because it is usually there and he had a puppy in there this time.

I went in to look at a compact XD and another magazine for my 10mm.  i'm headed back there tomorrow to pick up some ammo and i'll ask Howard then.

now back to the subject.  I'm in the process of trying to get some sort of official background check done on myself so i fulfill the Credential Category 1 for Defensive Edges Registration.

I believe i will have to talk to someone at the BCA and have them do it because the local Sherrifs office said that they would have to have Defensive Edge send in a background check request on me.  (The way i read DE's site i have to obtain those credentials myself.)



Our credential policy is pretty simple.  You can go to the BCA front desk and get a copy of your backgroud, we also accept a copy of your permit to purchase, a copy of a recently approved 4473, professional licenses that require backgrounds, etc.  If you have specifics on this please ask.  We know the credential policy can be a pain for some, it is something that we have always required and always will, as we don't want you or anyone else training on the range with people that maybe shouldn't be training.

CY6
Greg Sullivan "Sully"
Chief Instructor
SLR15 Rifles
TheDefensiveEdge.com
12/29/2006 2:38:27 AM EDT
[#38]
I'm sorry if i came off like i was complaining, i wasn't.  i totally understand the cover your ass angel and agree with your policy.  I'm going to call the BCA today and hammer out the details.
i won't make your class this weekend but that gives me a good opportunity to get some range time in.

12/29/2006 3:39:27 AM EDT
[#39]
height=8
I've not yet read Joel's authoritative book on the subject.  Yet the attitude toward potential consumers, and those who HAVE read his book or taken his course seems a bit disdainful and disconcerting. hat
And, yes, my book on carry in Minnesota is definitive -- if, as I said, only by process of elimination.  I'd  say that I look forward to some of the folks here publishing their own book on the subject, but I don't; it's a fair amount of work and for whatever reason, in more than three years, nobody else has published a book on the subject of carry in Minnesota.  

Which is a pity.  Competition is good, after all.  (I know that's considered a radical opinion in some parts, but, hey, I can live with that.)
12/29/2006 4:20:51 AM EDT
[#40]
Quit with the arguing or
12/29/2006 4:22:59 AM EDT
[#41]
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Due to events that happened recently I'm looking to take the conceal and carry class.




There's lots of good choices, depending on your level of experience and interest.  I'd second the advice to contact the individual instructors; my own take, fwiw, is that the instructor is a lot more important than the "brand."



As to the law of self-defense in Minnesota being "straight forward (sic)", I guess we're going to have to disagree, given the implications of Pendleton, Glowacki, et al, and particularly McCuiston, and the all-too-frequently-changing landscape.  (Of course, if you're comparing it to self-defense law in Missouri, perhaps you have a point.)  But perhaps I'm finding complications where you wouldn't -- then again, I have written the (so far, if only by process of elimination) definitive book on legal carry in Minnesota and Missouri and done certified CLE for both MN and ND lawyers and cops on such matters, so perhaps you might want to consider the possibility that I'm right.

 All abord the ego train toot toot my own horn
I'm terribly sorry if that bothers you, but, as they say: "no brag, just fact."  

(Actually, writing a book is easy -- you can ask just about anybody who hasn't done it, and they'll tell you.) hy
Oh, sure.  Just do, say, 100 pages of the manuscript first, as a filter; many people find that it's harder to actually write than to talk about writing.  (I'm one of them, as is, I believe, each and every other professional writer I know; it's much, much easier.  Not, in my limited experience -- only a couple of dozen published books -- nearly as gratifying, but that's another thing.)

Perhaps I shouldn't be holding my breath?

As I said:  no brag, just fact.  As to whether or not the book is any good, I don't get an opinion, and neither do folks who haven't read it -- given that all that takes is a trip to the library, I'm not sure that getting an informed opinion is an insuperable task.  

As to whether or not having written the definitive -- by elimination, if nothing else -- book on the subject is important, I guess that's a matter of opinion; I'm not sure what mine is.  I'm not at all sure that the book ought to be important to anyone, unless one is somebody who wishes to (legally) carry a handgun in Minnesota, and perhaps not even then -- after all, while a large minority of permit holders in Minnesota have bought the book (just over 25%), the majority haven't, and the vast majority of them have done just fine in terms of staying out of trouble.  

Getting back to the topic, I do want to repeat that when, in response to a question about [an instructor with whom I have no business relationship whatsoever, and barely know well enough to say hi to] I mentioned a verifiable, objective fact about [an instructor with whom I have no business relationship whatsoever, and barely know well enough to say hi to], it was not an attempt to (at least in the way that the term is normally used) "advertise" the services of [an instructor with whom I have no business relationship whatsoever, and barely know well enough to say hi to] ; I stated that, as a matter of fact, his presentation is used by all the instructors of [an instructor organization with whom I have no business relationship whatsoever].

The owners of this site are entirely within their rights to decide that that's "advertising"; it's their site, and they get to use such . . . unusual definitions.
12/29/2006 4:29:06 AM EDT
[#42]


Joel if your trying to make a good impression that your classes are the cats meow, i think your falling short because your attitude and arrogance are getting in the way.
12/29/2006 4:29:36 AM EDT
[#43]
I say let the consumer be an informer consumer!  I sure as all hell will not be pulling out some book to consult when there are pressing matters at hand.  Then again the  Pope of the Church of Joel likes to press things that perhaps are best left the way they are.  Arrogance does nothing to impress potential customers.  Turns them off as far as I can tell.  

And, Joel it is gunfighting is not lunch at the library reading.  It is about reacting to situation.  Oh yeah, then again you subscribe that practicing skill sets is not important.  You would rather have them mulling things over consulting your all important book.  Oh yeah in ND the law written a long time ago, and it was put forth with out the fan fare of BS that has surrounded CC in MN.
12/29/2006 4:31:58 AM EDT
[#44]
[quote
If anything we should be seeking the professional opinions of various Minnesota Judges, Lawyers, and other Professionals to assess their take and interpretation of Minnesota Concealed Carry Law to get a consensus on the grey areas of legislation and case law.  I think that's an utterly terrific idea (forgetting, for the moment, that we don't have a "Concealed Carry Law" in Minnesota), and wish you well with it.  You might or might not want to start with not just the "professional opinions" but the published opinions of judges and justices on various matters around self-defense and firearms law -- if you do, I'd suggest that you start with the Saunders case, as that's a particularly good example of how somebody who hasn't actually learned the law (but thinks that he has) can easily get himself into trouble.  

Best of luck with it -- if you do end up publishing a book on the subject, feel invited to send a set of bound galleys to me, and I'll offer a cover quote, if I think it's good.
12/29/2006 4:45:18 AM EDT
[#45]
geeeze.

i guess let me put this another way.

Joel, you are curently trolling and disrupting this thread. STOP IT NOW.

i am not a lawyer nor am i an authority on pretty much anything. that said i am charged with enforcing the rules of this forum.

Consider this my last warning. take it offline.

mike
12/29/2006 4:45:41 AM EDT
[#46]
Where did you get your law degree from? Joel are you a member of the MN Bar Association?  
12/29/2006 4:54:50 AM EDT
[#47]
trolling and pimping.