Posted: 3/2/2013 4:26:03 AM EDT
|
I got this email last night
So Someone smarter please tell me how to find it on the Illinois Gov web site , -----Original message----- From: NRA-ILA Alerts <[email protected]> Sent: Sat, Mar 2, 2013 01:47:30 GMT+00:00 Subject: Illinois: Sweeping Bans on Commonly Owned Firearms and Magazines Will be Considered in the House Next WeekIllinois: Sweeping Bans on Commonly Owned Firearms and Magazines Will be Considered in the House Next Week Your Action Makes a Difference – Contact Your Representative TODAY! Next week, the Illinois House will consider extreme anti-gun legislation that will ban commonly owned semi automatic firearms and standard capacity magazines. The particular language will most likely be attached on the House floor as amendments to shell bills, so no language is currently available. While under a federal court order to pass a state Right-to-Carry law, anti-gun Chicago politicians continue to play games with your right to self-defense. Rather than working on measures to reduce violent crime, they continue to play politics and attack the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens. The NRA-ILA will continue to send legislative updates as details become available. However, it is of the utmost importance that you act NOW to stop this gun and magazine ban and registration scheme. Your action stopped these attempts in Springfield earlier this year and it is important that you stay vigilant! Contact your state Representative IMMEDIATELY and politely urge them to oppose the banning of any semi-automatics or magazines. Contact information for your state legislators can be found here. |
|
The only reason they were debating a CCW law last week was that at some point they had to.
The Chicago area reps. are going to push hard for a state awb, and mag. capacity ban, etc. We have to be vigilant in watching any anti-gun bills. Just because a bill has very few sponsors signed on, doesn't mean it won't go quickly to a committee, and possibly end up for a floor vote. |
|
Quoted:
The only reason they were debating a CCW law last week was that at some point they had to. The Chicago area reps. are going to push hard for a state awb, and mag. capacity ban, etc. We have to be vigilant in watching any anti-gun bills. Just because a bill has very few sponsors signed on, doesn't mean it won't go quickly to a committee, and possibly end up for a floor vote. Remember - a common tactic is to name them with a benign sounding title. Consider SB2384 and HB2834: Quoted:
While browsing another thread I saw this about a bill sponsored by Antonio "No Boom Boom" Munoz. Originally Posted By
Suffice to say it is 200 pages long and unacceptable. I offered my comment: I haven't seen the text but I'll comment on it - if it originated on Munoz's desk it's probably a trap for law abiding gun owners full of pitfalls, prohibitions and exclusions but with plenty of exemptions for law enforcement.
Then came home to check. Boy, did I fucking call it. 
Here's Chicago Police Officers "Fast Eddie" and "No-Boom Boom" Munoz's version(s) – identical except for bill number: Referred to as the Illinois Public Safety Act.
Creates the Gun Safety and Responsibility Act. Allows State Police to issue a concealed carry license to a resident at least 21 who: (1) is eligible to possess firearms; (2) meets qualifications and training; and (3) has particularized need. $100 fee. License valid throughout the State subject to prohibitions for 4 years. Creates the State Police Firearm Services Fund for duties under the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act (FOID), concealed carry licensing, A little pricey, but doesn't sound too bad, right? But remember, this is CPD Officer on leave ACEVEDO AND MUNOZ's version, so there has to be at least one FUCK YOU to Illannoys law abiding gun owners unrealized criminals. ...and assault weapon registration.
Wait, what? WTF does CCW a law recognizing an individual right pursuant to a Federal Court order have to do with the poor, unjustly profiled Evil Black Rifles Misunderstood sporting implements of color? Amends the State Police Act to authorize emergency procurement necessary to implement these gun measures.
Well, at least they're getting the funds to get this moving! Amends the FOID Act to require background checks for the transfer of firearms, except to family member, by operation of law, or gun show.
WTF does a law recognizing an individual right pursuant to a Federal Court order have to do with universal background checks? FUCK YOU GUN OWNERS!!! WE’RE THE LATIN HUSTLERS, REPRESENTIN’ THE CHICAGO MACHINE, AND YOU'LL LIVE THE WAY WE SAY!!! Amends the Criminal Code of 2012. Bans possession, delivery, sale, and purchase of assault weapons, attachments, and .50 caliber rifles and cartridges, except possession of weapons registered in time provided.
WTF? There it is again! And an "Assault Weapon" only needs to have one of the evil features to be prohibited! FUCK YOU GUN OWNERS!!! WE’RE THE LATIN HUSTLERS, REPRESENTIN’ THE CHICAGO MACHINE, AND YOU'LL LIVE THE WAY WE SAY!!!] Provides exemptions. Prohibits delivery, sale, purchase or possession of large capacity ammunition feeding devices. Provides exemptions .
And a magazine ban that includes a ban on parts! WTF does a law recognizing an individual right pursuant to a Federal Court order have to do with a magazine ban? FUCK YOU GUN OWNERS!!! WE’RE THE LATIN HUSTLERS, REPRESENTIN’ THE CHICAGO MACHINE, AND YOU'LL LIVE THE WAY WE SAY!!! Prohibits sale, delivery, or possession of a firearm to or by a person prohibited from possessing a firearm. Raises minimum imprisonment for gunrunning.
While it's more of the same that's not too bad. Creates failure to report a lost or stolen firearm offense.
WTF does a law recognizing an individual right pursuant to a Federal Court order have to do with that? Requires safe firearm storage where a minor (now under 14) or person prohibited from possessing a firearm may gain access.
Again, WTF does a law recognizing an individual right pursuant to a Federal Court order have to do with that? Requires firearm owners to keep records. Amends various Acts regarding suspension and revocation of FOID cards and concealed carry licenses. Makes conforming changes. Effective immediately.
ETA2 - So I read the bill - so large it had to open in its own window.Some of the "additional recordkeeping" requirements: (e) An applicant shall sufficiently demonstrate, in the judgment of the Department that:
.
(1) he or she has a particularized need for the license; (2) he or she is a responsible person; and (3) the issuance of the license is in the public's interest "Right"? What is this thing you call "Right"? Beg, pissant. FUCK YOU GUN OWNERS!!! WE’RE THE LATIN HUSTLERS, REPRESENTIN’ THE CHICAGO MACHINE, AND YOU'LL LIVE THE WAY WE SAY!!! (b) The application shall contain the following:
(1) the applicant's name, current address, home and business telephone numbers, cell phone numbers, gender, date and year of birth, place of birth, height, weight, hair color, eye color, maiden name or any other name the applicant has used or identified with, and any address at which the applicant resided for more than 30 days within the 5 years preceding the date of the application; Okay... (2) the present business or occupation and any business or occupation in which the applicant has engaged during the 5-year period immediately preceding the application and the addresses of the business or place of employment;
(14) an explanation of the applicant's particularized need for and intended use of the firearm, including descriptions of any incident in which the applicant has been threatened or injured, or copies of police reports or restraining orders;
"Right"? What is this thing you call "Right"? Beg, pissant. FUCK YOU GUN OWNERS!!! WE’RE THE LATIN HUSTLERS, REPRESENTIN’ THE CHICAGO MACHINE, AND YOU'LL LIVE THE WAY WE SAY!!! (15) the make, model, manufacturer's name, caliber or gauge, and serial number of each handgun to be carried under the license;
"Gauge"? We're gonna be toting Judges? WTF? (16) written agreement that, if the person is approached by a peace officer while carrying a concealed firearm under the license, the person will immediately inform the officer that he or she is in possession of a firearm and a license to carry a concealed firearm, and will submit to a pat down search and allow the officer to take possession of the firearm for the duration of the encounter;
(17) written consent to submit to one or more field sobriety or chemical tests to determine the presence of alcohol or drugs, at any point when the person is carrying a concealed firearm and the person is approached by a peace officer who has a reasonable suspicion that the person is under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance; You wanted your 2nd Amendment? Fine. We'll take your Fourth. (18) proof that the applicant possesses the same powers of eyesight as required for a driver's license under Section 6-109 of the Illinois Vehicle Code; and if the applicant does not possess a current Illinois driver's license, the applicant may present a current optometrist's or ophthalmologist's statement certifying the vision reading obtained from the applicant;
Gotta make sure the unrealized criminal can read the 8 point font on the sign in the 2nd floor window that says "NO FIREARMS" (g) Each application shall contain the following statement: "NOTICE: A person who has been issued a concealed carry license by the Department of State Police and who is in possession of a concealed and loaded firearm shall be deemed to have given consent to a chemical test or tests of blood, breath, or urine for the purpose of determining the alcohol or drug content of the person's blood, if a police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe that the licensee has consumed any amount of an alcoholic beverage or drugs based upon evidence of the licensee's physical condition or other first hand knowledge of the police officer. The test or tests shall be administered at the direction of the arresting officer.".
The law enforcement agency employing the officer shall designate which tests shall be administered. A urine test may be administered even after a blood or breath test or both has been administered. Already treating us (more) like unrealized criminals. g) A licensee shall only carry a concealed firearm similar to what they were trained with under Section 70.
Certify with a revolver, only carry a revolver. Section 70. Applicant training.
(a) The Department shall, by rule, approve or disapprove training programs for the firearm training course, which shall be taught by a qualified instructor. Qualifications for qualified firearm instructors shall be set by rule. The firearm training course shall be conducted by entities, by a qualified instructor, or by an agency licensed under this Act, provided the course is approved by the Department. Notice the specific omission of length, content, or any other specifics. 40 hour Mandatory Firearms Training anybody? Requires safe firearm storage where a minor (now under 14) or person prohibited from possessing a firearm may gain access.
Forget 14 - he's calling for the age to be 18. So if your son or daughter kills a bad guy who broke into your home? Congratulations, good job, kid! Oh, by the way Dad or Mom? You're a felon - turn in your guns! FUCK YOU GUN OWNERS!!! WE’RE THE LATIN HUSTLERS, REPRESENTIN’ THE CHICAGO MACHINE, AND YOU'LL LIVE THE WAY WE SAY!!! (2) No person may acquire or possess firearm ammunition or a firearm ammunition feeding device within this State without having in his or her possession a valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card previously issued in his or her name by the Department of State Police under the provisions of this Act.
You'll need an FOID to purchase or possess a firearms magazine? FUCK YOU GUN OWNERS!!! WE’RE THE LATIN HUSTLERS, REPRESENTIN’ THE CHICAGO MACHINE, AND YOU'LL LIVE THE WAY WE SAY!!! More of his genius: a) (10) does not apply to or affect transportation of weapons that meet one of the following conditions:
(i) are broken down in a non-functioning state; or (ii) are not immediately accessible; or (iii) are unloaded and enclosed in a firearm case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other similar portable container designed for the safe transportation of firearms by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card. Hey, look! Danny Kotowski's "wildlife Code" definition! Remember keeping your gun in a glovebox or console after the Diggins case? FUCK YOU GUN OWNERS!!! WE’RE THE LATIN HUSTLERS, REPRESENTIN’ THE CHICAGO MACHINE, AND YOU'LL LIVE THE WAY WE SAY!!! g) Delivers any firearm of a size which may be concealed upon the person, incidental to a sale, without withholding delivery of such firearm for at least 72 hours after application and complete payment for its purchase has been made, or delivers any rifle, shotgun or other long gun, or a stun gun or taser, incidental to a sale, without withholding delivery of such rifle, shotgun or other long gun, or a stun gun or taser for at least 24 hours after application and complete payment for its purchase has been made.
Another FUCK YOU GUN OWNERS!!! WE’RE THE LATIN HUSTLERS, REPRESENTIN’ THE CHICAGO MACHINE, AND YOU'LL LIVE THE WAY WE SAY!!! However, this paragraph (g) does not apply to: the sale of a firearm to a law enforcement officer <snip>
Oh what a coincidence - that include Fast Eddie Acevedo and "No Boom Boom" Munoz!! For the TL:DR crowd: Munoz and Acevedo propose a CCW bill that's: Overpriced Requires a "demonstrated need" Vague undefined training requirements of unknown length as yet to be determined Requires submission to on demand search/blood/breath testing Requires registration of the CCW weapon Limits you to that particular model/type and includes all of the things they've been complaining about... Single feature AWB/registration Magazine Ban/registration Lost/Stolen gun penalty Increases age of kids accessing guns from 14 to 18 FOID required to possess or buy magazines (even 10 rounders) Requires a specific "firearms case" instead of console or container as won in Diggins |