[ARCHIVED THREAD] - My Front Sight Experience (Page 1 of 2)
Posted: 6/10/2007 7:19:40 PM EDT
I wanted to post this for everyone now that I've finally finished my article about Front Sight. I've pasted the text from it below. If you want to see it on my site with the pictures, click here.
|
Nothing at all. I just stated an obvious fact/question. I commend you on your grammar, applicable context, cognizant idea flow and sentence structure. I am no fan at gazing at anyone's Dangling Participles... No need to be so defensive ![]() V OUT |
|
Didn't Front Sight screw a bunch of people who sunk quite a bit of money in that whole land deal out there at their "compound"? I think there's a law suit in the works as well. Clint Smith wrote an article a few years ago about people who run out and get all this training who don't really have a need for it. It was a pretty good read. I'm not trying to shit in people's cereal but if you're not a cop or military why spend all kinds of cash on training for stuff you'll most likely never encounter? |
If you can question my wanting to learn HOW to use my homeland defense rifles, it is just as valid to question WHY I want them. Many people here won't stand for the second. Do you have a carry permit? What the hell for? The statistics tell me you'll never pull it let alone shoot it. Get the picture? |
| Dude, you spent all that money to be a life member, and you are carrying a Taurus! How serious are you about learning how to protect yourself??? If you have all the time and money to be driving out there, drive to the gun store and buy a Glock, Sig, or a quality 1911. |
|
I am going there because I have a CCW and feel that I should have some training if I am going to carry a firearm everyday. The reason I have the Taurus is that I wasn't sure I wanted a small gun like that so I didn't want to spend a bunch of money. I do have my eye on the Glock 27 but so far I haven't had any problems with the Taurus so why should I replace it? I've only had a couple of malfunctions and they were always because I didn't seat the magazine which was my own fault. So I'd say there is nothing wrong with my Taurus, of course that's just my own personal preference. I have heard some bad things about that gun but no problems here. |
He's probably referring to the rather silly firearms classes. Like shooting from a helicopter or from the bed of a pick up and other such nonsense. |
If you're a firearms enthusiast and your interests are in the tactical - practical area (and you have the money), why shouldn't you learn what you want to learn? It's like taking guitar lessons even if you have no plan to start the next biggest Rock & Roll band or learning how to sky-dive even though you have no intention of making a combat jump. -Besides, you never know when you're going to be put in a situation where you are on your own and something you have learned may save your life or someone else's. |
| You know what these places should offer and what you guys should also think about is tactical medicine classes. You stand a greater chance of getting f'ed up during an accident or random bullets than actually having to use your sidearm. Kind of a good idea to know how to control bleeding. Just a thought. |
| You know what these places should offer and what you guys should also think about is tactical medicine classes. You stand a greater chance of getting f'ed up during an accident or random bullets than actually having to use your sidearm. Kind of a good idea to know how to control bleeding. Just a thought. |
| I wsa actually looking into some kind of EMT classes but haven't found anything yet. I don't have the time to go through a college level course but I'm sure I can find something. I heard the red cross gave out first aid training for free or something like that. I leearned first aid in boot camp but that was a while ago. |
Here is one that I was looking at. Scroll down to towards the bottom and you will see it. These guys offer some great classes. www.lmsdefense.com/lms/home/courses thanks, Ron |
|
I guess I didn't make myself clear enough. I don't understand why people who aren't a cop, the military, or a private security contractor would want to take the time and the money for advanced tactical classes when they would never utilize the skill sets they would learn. I'm all for someone taking basic marksmanship and follow on courses in pratical shooting for CCW to make them a better shooter. However, for some guy who works in the IT field to take a class like the 4 Day Advanced Pratical Rifle course offered at Front Sight, is a waste of time and money for them. The article that Clint Smith wrote basically follows my same train of thought. I don't remember the article word for word but I do remember Mr. Smith's basic notion was that people are wasting their time running around all kitted up and trying to play army or whatever when the training will do them no good. I agree with that. But if all the Tactical Teddy's in the world much like the denziens of this site want to spend their hard earned money on that kind of thing, so be it. |
first aid is nice for basic stuff but that won't help you when you or someone else is bleeding to death. It's good you are looking into that kind of training. One thing to remember is that it is also perishable knowledge and hard to practice. I sure as hell won't let you practice needle decomp on me |
You are obviously welcome to your opinion. Clint also makes a wonderful living training people he thinks is foolish to train, FWIW. I've been to Thunder Ranch and I think you're taking his comments a bit out of context. His point of view was more one of "if you pull that rifle out for a serious social event, you probably won't have all that other stuff". Never did he question the why we were there. After all, his classes are probably 80% civilian. I don't mean to jump on you, but I have the point of view that I don't question what other people want to do with their spare cash and time, as long as they are fulfilling life's responsibilities. Your initial post very nearly came across as the typical clay shooter or Fudd that looks down on the type of rifles we choose to own. I'm sure you spend $$ and time on stuff I think would be foolish, but it is your $$ and time. As for me:
|
|
First off, if you are an avid shooter, regardless of job title, a 4 day class in advanced carbine will not be a waste of time, you will learn something useful to your hobby. Secondly, it is simply for enjoyment. I have no legitimate job use at this time for those classes but enjoy taking them, it gives me something else to practice when out shooting. I doubt I will ever need to do a transition from a carbine to a handgun in the middle of a fire fight but it's still fun to test your abilities in engaging multiple targets at different ranges with different techniques and weapon systems.. If that isn't a good enough explanation just think of different people's likes and desires. Some people pay 10s of thousands of dollars for one experience in a modern fighter, some pay hundreds to thousands to dog fight in WWII fighters. Some people pay thousands to learn to race Indy or Nascar knowing full well they will never even get behind the wheel again. John P.. |
It is a class action suit of three people. There were some considerable construction delays due to contractor problems over the past few years, and a few people got antsy and wanted their money back, all the while taking hundreds of courses a year between them. And while it may seem like a collection of people with a common interest of firearms might be creating a compound, a master planned gated community, the like of which is all over this state and others, hardly qualifies as a "compound." As for the use of tactical training for a civilian, man, I hope to god I never have to use any of it. On the rare chance that I have to use my firearm to protect my family or friends in a hostile situation, I'd sure as shit rather have "wasted my time" and have the skills to rely on, than not. |
It's no different than the guys I used to instruct for AMG when I was driving race cars. They'd spend $1300/day to come drive cars on the track and learn new skills that might, just maybe one day, save their lives. Of course it's damn cool to strap on a helmet and go flying around a track in someone else's 550 hp car too. Who cares what people want to spend their money on? Why do you feel the need to judge them or denigrate them for wanting to play tactical guy? It's a free country. Opinions are like assholes... |
| You know, I really want to like Front Sight. The idea of having such a big, world class firearms training center so close to home really appeals to me. I have just heard too much bad stuff about the place to consider going. It sounds like there are too many shady practices going on their on the business side. |
Denziens means people who inhabit an area such as the Hometown Forums. As to my occupation, Im an Air Force Security Forces Craftsman, 3P071 aka. Cop. I'm a veteran of three campaigns in GWOT and a combat veteran. I've been a patrolman, desk sergeant, armorer, MK-19 gunner, protective service detail member, and an 81mm mortarman. So I think that qualifies me to lend my opinion however unpopular.
|
|
I am glad that people take classes like this. First, it's way less gay than spending hundreds of dollars to trot around manicured lawns, chasing a dimpled ball with a stick. Second, it supports the firearms industries. He had to buy gear, ammo, ear protection, guns, etc. Third, if God forbid, he should ever need those skills, he has banked some time on them and will have options that wouldn't be available if he hadn't "wasted" his money. To me, a better analogy would be the taking of martial arts. It makes you a better person, even if you never use your ninja skills to defeat an invading Samurai army. It's good exercise and good for discipline building. My opinion probably doesn't carry much weight, since I don't kill for a living...but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express
|
Hmmm.... chiz45 and I talked about putting a 'first aid for recreational shooters' kind of class a year or so ago. I got the okay from the Health District to put a syllabus together, etc, and AMR did say they'd let me use the facilities to teach it. Not to mention Dr. Carrison said he'd come in and do his ballistics lecture. I kind of put it away.... life happened. ![]() Is this an idea I should resurrect? Maybe a two or three day class?- not the equlivalent of EMT or even first responder, but at least you'd know the basic first aid for injuries/illnesses you're likely to see here in southern NV out on the range.... at least until the pros get there on scene. Hell, maybe I can talk TraumaRN (and who else is it on here that works here?the_agent?) into talking a little about what they do at the trauma center with GSW's..... BTW- FWIW, I'll probably never go to Front Sight. I appreciate the review, kahman, but they've just gotten too much bad press here in NV, and they're a little too pricey for my tastes. I've been pleased with Line of Fire- smaller classes and alot of personalized advice. |
Sounds like a great idea for a class. I'd be there. |
Been waiting for you to chime in. Go for it, I will help. I'm no medic but I can share the equipment, training and experiences of treating GSW and other misc flying metal, for those who might be the first responder involuntarily. |
|
Originally posted by Bedhead BTW- FWIW, I'll probably never go to Front Sight. I appreciate the review, kahman, but they've just gotten too much bad press here in NV, and they're a little too pricey for my tastes. I've been pleased with Line of Fire- smaller classes and alot of personalized advice. Bedhead hit the nail right on the head here. Too much bad press and shady dealings going on there and the prices suck as well. If you want good training go with Joe Nizzari with Line of Fire, good instruction and he wont try to recruit you into his church either. |
That sounds great. I've got alot of time in the rig here in an urban environment, but not being military, I'm sure that I don't have the real live war experience you do. And yes, you have access to some cool little .mil doodads that I can't get hold of. We'll see if we can set it up for when you get back.... I'll have to put the syllabus/course together and get approval from SNHD though. |
I think this is a good idea as you both have some important imput to the class. Heck I might even be in to take the class because you never know what could happen in a house with guns or out in Vegas or at the range for that matter. |
|
I've taken 2 courses at front sight and am a lifetime member. I'm glad I spent the money, and I agree with the review 100%. Although I am getting sick and tired of the constant mail and phone calls asking for membership upgrades. Front Sight solicites more than the NRA, which is pretty bad too. Sure it's for a good cause but come on. I would also love to take a medic course, if one were available locally. |
Thank you for your votes of confidence Guys and Gals. Those of you that have gone through any Line of Fire, LLC, course know the level of instruction provided, and the caliber of the range staff and how we care about each and every student that sets foot in the classroom and on the firing line. For those who have participated in Line of Fire courses, I again say Thank You. For those that will be attending courses, I say welcome aboard! As always, I will continue to serve and maintain my students with the highest quality, profesional firearms and self-defense training. Be Safe. Joe PS: I'll have the Veggie Burger with soy cheese, and lettuce tomato and Nayonaise. |
Front Sight Litigation
|
Thanks for your interest, Chiz. I would love to train with you as well, and hopefully you will be able to make training with us in the future. I hear nothing but good things about PFC, and I know that Steve and his staff are top notch. On the other hand, I hope that you will give LOF a try sometime. Be Safe. Joe |


