Posted: 11/13/2008 11:50:35 AM EDT
|
Ran across this on the web. I know I want one!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQulwe5fjzE |
|
Quoted:
Would that be an AOW or an SBR? Neither. It would be a post-sample MG if it were ever produced (it was a one-off proto that Magpul did). IF it were a semi, the FTB would have to classify it, and I'd guess they'd come up with SBR, just to get the extra $195. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
in semi only it would be a SBR It could also fall into the "gadget" gun category, like convertible radio or breifcase guns, both of which the FTB calls AOWs... i dont think it would cause im sure you would have to be able to fire it wile it looked like a flashlight....only breifcase aow i have seen with with mp5 in them and could fire wile the mp5 was hidden..never seen a radio one..if ya got a pic post it please but i could be wrong |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
in semi only it would be a SBR It could also fall into the "gadget" gun category, like convertible radio or breifcase guns, both of which the FTB calls AOWs... i dont think it would cause im sure you would have to be able to fire it wile it looked like a flashlight... ...but i could be wrong If it is designed to be concealed on one's person, disguised as something other than a firearm, and doesn't fit the traditional definition of "pistol", "rifle" or "shotgun" in the NFA, then it would fall under the AOW category. My guess is that FTB would go for the SBR. only breifcase aow i have seen with with mp5 in them and could fire wile the mp5 was hidden..never seen a radio one..if ya got a pic post it please
The original Stoner-designed ARES m9 (which the Magpul is based on) had a shell that was supposed to look somewhat like a radio, IIRC. There is a later (post ARES) version at the end of this page: Photos of Unique and Rare Firearms by Oleg Volk 
Photos belong to Oleg, obviously. ETA: That's not to say that's what I was referring to, I just can't find a photo of the AOW I was thinking of. 
|