Posted: 9/10/2008 12:58:00 PM EDT
...looks like this.
|
WELL DONE SIR! |
Funny thing, when LilGator was shooting my 10/22 I told him to go ahead and shoot mine. He went back to his Motor home and got his own (or Dads) after I left the line!  BTW I think I could show 6601 of 22LR if I dug it all out! |
Mine asked to "borrow" some ammo for last Fri. When I asked him about using his own, he said it was the good stuff, and he didn't want to waste it.  Yeah... we had a talk. 
|
Most excellent sir! A perfect post it is! Yes, "12,000 rnds of HIGH VELOCITY ammunition!" To strike fear in the hearts of the libtards! |
Why do you all despise anyone that represents the democratic party? I know you're not millionaires so I suspect you've been brainwashed by woland. Rogo |
No, seriously, !OdT tends to prefer CCI Standard Velocity in his 10/22s as it tends to not only cycle the weapon more reliably, but he attains better accuracy with it. I'm pretty sure it has nary to do with political affiliations. Hell, I even highlighted the above correction in blue, which coincidentally represents the Democrat Party, as in "Blue States". Again, in review: CCI Standard Velocity .22LR ≠ party affiliation. |
|
I'll try this one. "Libtard" : In this situation, would be a Liberal who might be so scared of "high velocity" .22 ammunition or a surplus of it, that they would want to ban it. We find this to be retarded. Liberal + Retarded = libtard. Much like the use of Neocon (two words abbreviated, smushed together, then thrown as an insult). ODT's picture of 12,000 rounds of high velocity ammunition might cause the fear listed above. Therefore: Yes, "12,000 rnds of HIGH VELOCITY ammunition!" To strike fear in the hearts of the libtards! is correct by the above definition. If you do not feel that high velocity ammunition or a surplus of high velocity ammunition is a scary thing. And you don't feel it should be banned. Then you do not fit that particular definition of "libtard" and the statement does not apply to you. Make sense? |
0/10  Two assumptions and one suspicion, does not a post make. Go attempt your pandering game in someone elses thread. |