Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
1/5/2007 11:06:14 AM EDT
From Joe Waldron, of the Citizen's Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, also President of the Washington Arms Collectors, AKA Our Man in Olympia:

GOAL Alert 1-2007 5 January 2007

ACTION REQUIRED ACTION REQUIRED ACTION REQUIRED

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/298561_guns05.html


DESPITE SHOTINGS, GUN CONTROL UNLIKELY

Lawmakers reluctant to pass measures

“OLYMPIA -- Heading into the 2007 Legislature, leading lawmakers are reluctant to pass new gun-control measures despite last year's mass killing on Capitol Hill, a downtown office shooting and this week's gun slaying of a Tacoma high school student.

“Insiders and experts say the gun lobby's influence may be too strong, politicians' courage too weak and the number of gun victims still too low to prompt action.”


The lead-in to today’s Seattle P-I story about the future of proposed gun control laws in Olympia sounds good for gun rights advocates. But is it?

The true intent of the P-I is to build pressure on legislators to pass gun control legislation during the upcoming session DESPITE the fact that none of the proposals would have prevents Wednesday’s shooting at Foss High School or earlier high visibility shootings in King and Pierce counties.

We can expect to see more news articles and editorials in the coming weeks calling for passage of Seattle Mayor Nickels’ “reasonable gun control” agenda, an agenda that was first announced last May and was broadcast again the same day of the Foss HS shooting. Of course the interesting this is that while the mayor’s four point program has nothing to do with recent shooting incidents, it is identical to Washington Ceasefire’s gun control agenda.

The mayor is calling for passage of four new laws:

Closing the non-existent “gun show loophole”

Banning so-called “assault weapons”

Mandating the use of locking devices on firearms

Creating a “crime gun tracing program”

Here’s the other side of the story on all of these proposals:

Gun shows


The “gun show loophole” is a myth, manufactured by the gun control lobby.

Fewer than 1% of felons get their guns at gun shows (US DOJ study).

All laws that apply to sales of guns, by dealers and by private citizens, outside of gun shows, also apply at gun shows. There is no “loophole.”

The only gun shows conducted in the greater Seattle area – those put on by the Washington Arms Collectors – ALREADY require background checks before a gun may be purchased. No background check, no membership; no membership, no gun sales.

“Assault weapons”

These firearms are rarely used in crimes.

These firearms are in fact are less lethal than the common duck hunter’s shotgun.

Contrary to popular belief, these firearms are NOT “readily convertible to full automatic fire.”

Approximately 200 high power rifle matches are conducted in Washington annually, matches where so-called “assault rifles” play a prominent part.

Mandatory “safe” storage

Washington’s existing reckless endangerment statute (RCW 9A.36.050) may already be used to prosecute irresponsible gun owners.

Accidental shootings in Washington are rare. According to the CDC, accidental shootings don’t even make the “top 10” causes of accidental deaths among juveniles.

Personal security requirements vary widely; one state-mandated size does not fit all.

Trigger locks and loaded firearms are an inherently unsafe combination, something that all lock manufacturers caution against.

Trigger locks do not prevent theft of firearms.

“Crime gun” tracing

The BATF already runs the National Tracing Center, available to all law enforcement agencies

The Washington Department of Licensing already maintains the state pistol registry, where all handguns sold at retail are linked to the purchaser

Tracing information is already available for criminal prosecution of violators.

The true purpose for this so-called tracing scheme is to use the data to sue gun dealers and distributors because federal law prohibits such use of federal data.

The true root cause of so-called “gun violence” in Seattle and other urban areas is the proliferation of gangs, of drug dealing, and of the failure of the criminal justice system to keep dangerous criminals incarcerated. All the gun control laws in the world won’t control these activities… just look at the gang and drug problem in England.

I need you to do two things:

Write a letter to the editor of your local newspaper, using the talking points above, to tell the truth about Mayor Nickels’ gun control scheme.
Pick one topic, keep the letter down to about two to three paragraphs to increase the chance it will be published. Contact information (including e-mail addresses normally) for letters to the editor is available on the editorial page of your newspaper.

Write or call your state legislators (one Senator and two Representatives) and ask them to keep you informed on proposed gun control legislation. Make sure THEY know that Mayor Nickels’ (and Washington Ceasefire’s) gun control agenda will have no impact on crime.
You can reach your legislators through the legislative hotline at (800)

Edited to take up less space...
1/5/2007 12:18:22 PM EDT
[#1]
Can we get these GOAL Alerts tacked until a new one is put up?  Would be nice so every one that doesn't visit the WAHTF regularly can see them on the 1st page.  We may need all the help we can get.
1/5/2007 7:48:46 PM EDT
[#2]
Just sent mine, only took a few minutes to write! Copy, change, and reuse if you like.


Ask yourself, what is an “Assault Weapon”? Do you really know? Do you envision a fully automatic AK-47 spraying 1000 bullets per minute? If you are, you are mistaken. There is a huge misconception in our country about these firearms and it all starts with misinformation.  

The 2007 Washington State Legislature is proposing a ban of so called “Assault Weapons” in our state. These legal firearms are rarely used in crimes, but are used by hunters, hobbyists, and for home protection. Contrary to popular belief, these firearms are NOT “readily convertible to full automatic fire.”

Placing a ban on these firearms would be taking away legal hobbies for thousands of law-abiding citizens of Washington.  Approximately 200 high power rifle matches are conducted in Washington annually, matches where so-called “assault weapons” play a prominent part.  Skills such as firearm safety, marksmanship, self-confidence, and self-discipline are taught to hundreds of our youth at these matches.

Before you vote to ban “Assault Weapons”, ask yourself “Do I really know all the facts?”


1/5/2007 9:49:32 PM EDT
[#3]

 GOAL Post 2007-1

Legislative Update from Olympia 5 January 2007

LEGISLATURE CONVENES MONDAY, 8 JANUARY

PRE-FILED GUN BILLS

BILL TUTORIAL

LEGISLATIVE CALENDAR

DEMOCRAT CAUCUS DIVIDED ON GUNS?

The 60th (biennial) Washington state legislature convenes Monday,
January 8^th for it’s long (105 day) session. The principal focus of the
long legislative session is supposed to be the biennial budget, but rest
assured several other topics, including firearms, will receive
attention. The Democrats achieved a super-majority in the 2006 election,
so their control of BOTH chambers (House and Senate) has increased. In
addition, they control the Governor’s Mansion as well. (“Special
interests” are those interests of a small percentage of the population –
like Washington Ceasefire’s 3,500 members statewide; public interests
are those interests of a significant percentage of the population – like
Washington’s 1,000,000+ gun owners.)

New bills must be filed for consideration by the 60^th Legislature.
Three gun control bills have already been pre-filed. They’re listed
below under “Bill Status.”

For those new to legislative affairs, here’s how the process works: When
a bill is filed in the House or Senate (or both, simultaneously, called
“companion bills”) it is assigned to a policy committee. Most
gun-related bills go to the Senate Judiciary Committee in the Senate. In
the House it’s a little more complicated, as it may be sent to House
Judiciary, House Public Safety, or House Juvenile Justice. Public
hearings may be held, after which the bill may (or may not) be voted out
of committee. If the bill has a fiscal impact (usually an expenditure of
more than $50,000), it must then go to Senate Ways & Means or one of a
couple of House fiscal committees. The bill then goes to the Senate or
House Rules Committee, where it must be voted on to pass out to the
floor for a full vote.

After a bill passes the Senate or House, it then goes over to the
opposite chamber (House or Senate), where the whole process starts over
again. If the bill passes the second chamber in the same form it passed
the first, it goes to the governor for signature (or veto or partial
veto). If changes are made in the second chamber, it goes back to the
first for concurrence. It may also go to a conference committee from
both chambers to resolve differences. The final version must pass both
chambers.

The bill then goes to the Governor, who may sign it into law, veto
(kill) the bill, or sign a partial veto (killing just selected
section(s) of the bill). The governor may also allow a bill to become
law without her (or his) signature. Most signed bills take effect on 1
July, although bills with an “emergency clause” (considered immediately
necessary for public safety) take effect upon signature by the governor.

One of the first items of business in each session is the adoption of
the session calendar, identifying dates by which bills must clear
various hurdles. A bill that fails to clear the policy committee or
chamber floor by the designated date is generally considered dead for
the year, although they may be “resurrected” by parliamentary procedure.
I’ll post the cut-off dates for the 2006 session in the next issue of
GOAL Post.

Democrats MAY face a dilemma on the gun issue during this session. When
the Democrat caucus was largely limited to urban districts, support for
gun control was very high. Now that the Democrats have expanded their
reach to rural districts, enthusiasm for gun control is diluted. If the
Democrats expect to hold these rural districts in the next election,
they will have to tread carefully on the gun issue. If you live in a
rural or even suburban district with Democrat Representatives or a
Democrat Senator, it is important that you call their office and express
concern about your gun rights. Ask them to keep you informed of any
gun-related legislation. This lets them know that you are watching them
on this issue.

BILL STATUS:

All bills filed during the 2005-06 biennium are dead. The following
bills have been pre-filed for the 2007-08 biennium:

Bill # Subject Sponsor Status

HB 1011 Alien firearm licenses Moeller (D-49) pending

HB 1014 Mandatory safe storage Moeller (D-49) pending

HB 1026 Gun show loophole Williams (D-22) pending
1/5/2007 9:59:40 PM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:
Can we get these GOAL Alerts tacked until a new one is put up?  Would be nice so every one that doesn't visit the WAHTF regularly can see them on the 1st page.  We may need all the help we can get.



Good idea.

I've created a tacked post at the top of the forum that I will add each new GOAL post to as they are issued.

I'd like to keep that thread as a reference only and have discussions held in threads dedicated to each new GOAL post.  A link to the discussion threads as the are created will be provided within the tacked reference thread.
1/5/2007 10:51:06 PM EDT
[#5]
That's great!  Thanks, Phil!!
1/6/2007 10:04:47 AM EDT
[#6]
MY letter to the P-I - this should confuse them!
-------------------------------------------
    I for one am glad that it's unlikely that politicians'
courage is too "weak" to make gun control a priority in this
legislative session.  I hope they are also too "weak" to attack
our other basic rights, such as free speech, freedom of religion
(any religion), reproductive choice and the right to assemble
peaceably.
    The gun control bills considered in recent sessions have
been stinkers:  "gun show" bills that would seriously damage
shows already doing background checks, "assault weapon" bans
that would send police into houses to inspect storage lockers
based on cosmetic criteria possessed by those firearms (guns
that are underrepresented in crime).
    Democrats should focus on the positive aspects of their
platform, reducing crime by giving people a hand up.  Attacking
one of the Republican party's few pro-rights positions is
NOT the way to go.

Sincerely,

(me)
(Address)
(Phone)