Armory Sponsor
Posted: 3/17/2005 12:39:11 AM EDT
|
I have one of these rifles paid 900 about 7 years ago was thinking of tradin it or selling it. It is built with hk part (not the knock offs) with a serial # of less than 800. Anyone know a good market price on these? It has been very accurate for me but I have got the 6.8 bug and need to part with it. Thanks in advance. -sigadvantage- |
|
I feel your pain Sigadvantage. I bought one that was made by Federal Arms for $600 in 1998 when they were the only HK clone on the market (The stamped Springfield Armory SAR-8s were effectively out of my price range). It's been 100% reliable and as accurate as I can expect a roller-locked combat rifle to be. After seeing posts about poorly timed cocking systems, bent this and that, and general POS'ness of the newer HK91 clones, I am still happy with my rifle, since it has been good to me, and I didn't have to get it re-worked to mostly functional status after I bought it. People were having bad experiences with the cast reciever guns sold by Springfield Armory, but I have never heard a problem about the rifles sold by Federal Arms, maybe it's a question of build quality. So, expect the "clone purists" Edited: paging Harlan at FAC... |
|
FAC (Federal Arms) made the receiver, but did not do assembly of rifles. Most rifles with FA91 receivers were assembled by Century, who claims to never have had a return based on an issue with the receiver. Springfield did employ the alloy receiver in assembling a run of model SAR-8 rifles, but reported problems had nothing to do with the receiver. Harlan FAC |
| I got a FA91 quite few years back never fired it though.. I noticed the parts on mine appeared to be worn. The finish on areas of the barrel were almost worn down to the bare metal and I noticed the loading lever housing was dinged and bent in areas. I'm a little concerned about taking it out. I shelled out about 800 bones for mine. |
Armory Sponsor
