Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
9/22/2006 2:24:09 PM EDT
well, sure this has been done before, but figured i'd ask anyway .

anyway, just like the title says. what kind of scope in the $300 range would be good for longer range shooting (300-600 yards), but stand up to the FAL design? i'd be mounting it via the DSA mount if that helps any.

any input appreciated, and as always, pics of your set up more than welcome.....
9/22/2006 3:07:37 PM EDT
[#1]
Burris 3-9X40 Fullfield II with BallisticPlex reticule.  Use Leupold Medium QRW mounts on the DSA scope rail.  You can use QRW Low mounts if you mill/file off a few rearmost lugs on the mount, but the medium fits pretty well.  Mount rings with QD levers on shooter's left, so that scope can be dismounted with shooting hand on pistol grip.
Set to 6X, and you have reticular hold-overs to 500 yds for 150gn milsurp.  Other powers will serve for different bullet weights/ muzzle velocities,

Burris Forever Warranty, to whomever owns the scope when Warranty work may be needed.

Leupold Anti-Reflection Device will fit, must be secured by appropriate flip-open lens cover.

$169 + S+H from Natchez Shooter's Supply.

I have this set-up on my FAL, and am well pleased with it.

If you feel the need to go further out up to 1,000 yds (beyond 600 yds is problematic on most FALs shooting milsurp), then spend $550 and get a Shepherd with ranging circles appropriately sized for your intended target..   18" is good for two-legged varmints, FWIW.

Disclaimer:  No financial interest.
9/22/2006 7:57:50 PM EDT
[#2]
The Leupold VX-III 1.75-6X I have on my DSA has held up so far quite well.  The magnification seems just dandy for the accuracy of the rifle.

My Bushnell 3200 however did not.  My zero began to wander around the paper and I was tearing my hair out trying to really zero it.  Put the Leupold on and it hasn't moved again.  I don't know if it's busted or it just can't eat the repeated recoil?  It's a decent scope but I don't think it likes the FAL much.  

So far that's my scope experiance in the land of FAL.
9/23/2006 12:24:40 PM EDT
[#3]
An IOR/Valdada M1 or M2 4x24 may fit your needs and can gernerally be found second hand for that price.... makes for a great combat/hunting scope but thats about it.      
9/23/2006 2:58:15 PM EDT
[#4]
Go for the Burris.
9/23/2006 7:52:52 PM EDT
[#5]
IOR M1 on my DSA love it
9/26/2006 4:24:12 PM EDT
[#6]
Hensoldt Ferro z24 from Dans. Brand new Zeiss glass, sell the claw mount and buy an ARMS STANAG base for your DSA cover or an Imbel STANAG cover from Sarco.
9/27/2006 2:46:13 PM EDT
[#7]
thanks for the input guys, much appreciated.

i guess my next question is, when scoping out the FAL with the above set ups, how high up does it put the scope? wondering if i'd have to get a cheekrest and all that stuff to be able to shoot it ok? the padded one from DSA doesn't look bad, but am hoping not to have to do anything major, as with an M14.

RAF, how high do the medium rings put the scope up? still need a cheekpad?
9/27/2006 4:34:06 PM EDT
[#8]
It is going to be higher, no question about that; I would suggest a Blackhawk cheekpad.
9/27/2006 4:48:02 PM EDT
[#9]
FAL's are simple, I'd use a simple scope.  For your 'riddle' I'd answer with a Leupold VXII 1.75X6X33 or 2X7X33 scope.  

Simple, reliable, accurate, low profile, and affordable.
9/27/2006 5:28:30 PM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:
thanks for the input guys, much appreciated.

i guess my next question is, when scoping out the FAL with the above set ups, how high up does it put the scope? wondering if i'd have to get a cheekrest and all that stuff to be able to shoot it ok? the padded one from DSA doesn't look bad, but am hoping not to have to do anything major, as with an M14.

RAF, how high do the medium rings put the scope up? still need a cheekpad?


My FAL has the standard Steyr buttstock (not the lower humpback) so I don't need a cheekpiece.  No one I've let shoot it has complained, but that may mean nothing; maybe they were being polite.  Don't know what buttstock you have, nor the configuration of your face.
9/27/2006 5:49:26 PM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:
thanks for the input guys, much appreciated.

i guess my next question is, when scoping out the FAL with the above set ups, how high up does it put the scope? wondering if i'd have to get a cheekrest and all that stuff to be able to shoot it ok? the padded one from DSA doesn't look bad, but am hoping not to have to do anything major, as with an M14.

RAF, how high do the medium rings put the scope up? still need a cheekpad?


I used WARNE medium quick-release rings and I think that puts me right around 2.7" above bore.  A cheekpiece might be useful but I never have had much trouble without.  I put a small piece of electrical tape over a little bit of folded card and that helps me place my face on the same spot on the stock each time, I can feel it with my cheek.
9/27/2006 7:52:36 PM EDT
[#12]
Not my FAL anymore, but when I did have it I really liked the Burris Fullfield II 1.75-5x in the ARMS #22 low rings and 1" ring inserts. As you can see, the scope sat right off the rails and did not raise my cheekweld significantly. I'd delete the rear BC scope cap, as it interfered with the magnification adjustment ring. Scope and ring combo would come in under $300 if you bought the rings off the EE - they show up pretty often.

9/28/2006 6:41:10 AM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:
Hensoldt Ferro z24 from Dans. Brand new Zeiss glass, sell the claw mount and buy an ARMS STANAG base for your DSA cover or an Imbel STANAG cover from Sarco.


Just ordered one.  I haven't decided whether I am going to get an ARMS#7 STANAG adapter, or whether to get an authentic mount from Sarco.  leaning toward the latter, which means that I'll be saying good by to the ARMS mount currently on my FAL.

Obviously, the Hensoldt gets my nod for "the best scope for ~ $300".  I was sorely tempted to get an Aimpoint ML3, which sells for about $350, or a Zeiss Z-Point, which is a few bucks more.



9/28/2006 8:31:19 AM EDT
[#14]
did your scope from dan's come with the illuminator?
9/28/2006 9:28:36 AM EDT
[#15]
I just got my new Z24 from Dans yesterday; it has very nice glass!
I believe Dan has the illuminators, but sells them seperately for $100. I bought a couple of the Leapers T28 illuminators for mine, works fine and only cost $30.
9/28/2006 9:33:10 AM EDT
[#16]
It is my understanding that Dan's no longer has any illuminators in stock.  They do not come as standard equipment.

How long did it take for you to receive your Z24?  I just ordered mine a couple hours ago.  The wait is going to be torture...
9/28/2006 1:19:08 PM EDT
[#17]
It took three days to get to me.
9/28/2006 1:36:14 PM EDT
[#18]
how do i find a Leapers T28 illuminator?
do they fit the dovetail on the hendtsolt?
9/28/2006 1:42:55 PM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:
how do i find a Leapers T28 illuminator?
do they fit the dovetail on the hendtsolt?


I got mine from waffenjaeger on ebay (also his ID on hkpro.com/forums).
Fits fine on mine!
9/29/2006 6:38:13 AM EDT
[#20]
google and hkpro have turned up nothing for me.

anyone have a pic so i know what im looking for?

apologies for the hijack Shamus
9/29/2006 12:07:34 PM EDT
[#21]
9/29/2006 3:26:48 PM EDT
[#22]
I'd like to find a nic simple 6x for my FAL. Someone here had a Leapers straight 6 and said it worked fine. I may spring for one just for the heck of it and try it out myself.
9/29/2006 3:41:12 PM EDT
[#23]

Quoted:
Use Leupold Medium QRW mounts


+1


Quoted:
The Leupold VX-III 1.75-6X I have on my DSA has held up so far quite well.  The magnification seems just dandy for the accuracy of the rifle.

My Bushnell 3200 however did not.  My zero began to wander around the paper and I was tearing my hair out trying to really zero it.  Put the Leupold on and it hasn't moved again.  I don't know if it's busted or it just can't eat the repeated recoil?  It's a decent scope but I don't think it likes the FAL much.  

So far that's my scope experiance in the land of FAL.


That's really interesting, I had a Bushnell 3x9 40mm 3200 w/firefly fail after about 20 shots on my STG58.   I sent it back and they sent me a new scope for free but I haven't remounted it, I am really happy with the Leupold QRW rings... zero never wandered, but a gasket came came loose inside and you couldn't see out the scope.  Haven't remounted... now I am a bit nervous.... I have a 3200 10x on a .50BMG that is just awesome, it's why I bought the second one... not sure what to do, maybe the 3x9 3200 will be sent down to a .223.......
9/30/2006 3:13:42 AM EDT
[#24]
If 6x is what you want then the IOR 35mm is the way to go.
10/7/2006 10:53:54 AM EDT
[#25]
I'm using a  Leupold fixed 6X by 42mm, with the target turrets, and like it a lot.  You can shop around and get this sccope for 300-400 bucks.  Since it's a Leupold, it's rock solid.  
I had a set of ARMS high rings from a AR project, and they work OK, but are a bit high. To the guy who used a set of low rings - how did they feel?  Were they a bit too low, and would the medium been better, or was low the way to go?
10/9/2006 11:46:00 AM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:
Not my FAL anymore, but when I did have it I really liked the Burris Fullfield II 1.75-5x in the ARMS #22 low rings and 1" ring inserts. As you can see, the scope sat right off the rails and did not raise my cheekweld significantly. I'd delete the rear BC scope cap, as it interfered with the magnification adjustment ring. Scope and ring combo would come in under $300 if you bought the rings off the EE - they show up pretty often.

www.visuality.com/personal/fal/fal_lt.jpg


Wow think im gonna go with this setup as well.
10/11/2006 2:03:19 PM EDT
[#27]
Here is my G1 with a IOR 4x24 - IOR med. QD rings and ARMS #3 mount. Great scope for the money. Glass is almost as nice as my ACOG TAO1 at half the price.


I have 2 more FAL's on the way. Thinking about putting a Hensoldt Ferro z24 on one of em.




10/11/2006 2:37:44 PM EDT
[#28]

Quoted:
Here is my G1 with a IOR 4x24 - IOR med. QD rings and ARMS #3 mount. Great scope for the money. Glass is almost as nice as my ACOG TAO1 at half the price.


I have 2 more FAL's on the way. Thinking about putting a Hensoldt Ferro z24 on one of em.


i10.tinypic.com/2a8ot2u.jpg

i10.tinypic.com/4bf4ojp.jpg


that's a damn fine looking FAL triage
10/11/2006 5:50:10 PM EDT
[#29]

Quoted:
Here is my G1 with a IOR 4x24 - IOR med. QD rings and ARMS #3 mount. Great scope for the money. Glass is almost as nice as my ACOG TAO1 at half the price.


I have 2 more FAL's on the way. Thinking about putting a Hensoldt Ferro z24 on one of em.


i10.tinypic.com/2a8ot2u.jpg

i10.tinypic.com/4bf4ojp.jpg


crap...can't see the pics.
10/12/2006 1:50:55 PM EDT
[#30]
They are back up. Try refreshing your browser. Sometimes that brings the pics back up.
10/13/2006 1:39:18 PM EDT
[#31]

Quoted:
They are back up. Try refreshing your browser. Sometimes that brings the pics back up.


the pics are working now, thanks. Beautiful FAL you've got there....
10/24/2006 11:16:25 AM EDT
[#32]

Quoted:
Here is my G1 with a IOR 4x24 - IOR med. QD rings and ARMS #3 mount. Great scope for the money. Glass is almost as nice as my ACOG TAO1 at half the price.


I have 2 more FAL's on the way. Thinking about putting a Hensoldt Ferro z24 on one of em.


i10.tinypic.com/2a8ot2u.jpg

i10.tinypic.com/4bf4ojp.jpg


SHINY!!!!!!!
11/3/2006 9:19:08 PM EDT
[#33]
+1 IOR / Valdada
11/5/2006 12:25:09 AM EDT
[#34]
+1 on the Burris Fullfield.  Great glass for the money and the only budget priced glass I would ever bother with.  Afther this, step up in $$$ and pick up a used Leupold off of Ebay.

I prefer 1x magnification like Eotech or Aimpoint on my FALs.  It is hard to find a 500-600 yard shot here in Northeast Ohio.
11/5/2006 5:35:38 AM EDT
[#35]
Now that I got it mounted, here is the Hensoldt Z24.  $375, but comes with a mount that is easily worth $150.  I sold the mount within 20 minutes of putting it up for sale.  Brings the price down to under $300.  The illuminator is extra, however.  Cheaper than Dirt sells them for $30.



It proved to be quite difficult to get a decent pic of the reticle with my camera.  Anyhow, this is what the reticle looks like:
11/5/2006 10:47:35 AM EDT
[#36]

Quoted:
Now that I got it mounted, here is the Hensoldt Z24.  $375, but comes with a mount that is easily worth $150.  I sold the mount within 20 minutes of putting it up for sale.  Brings the price down to under $300.  The illuminator is extra, however.  Cheaper than Dirt sells them for $30.

i29.photobucket.com/albums/c256/arfcompics/100_1930.jpg

It proved to be quite difficult to get a decent pic of the reticle with my camera.  Anyhow, this is what the reticle looks like:
i29.photobucket.com/albums/c256/arfcompics/100_1934.jpg


You kinda lost me with the mount. How does it mount if you sold the one it comes with? And what batteries does it take?
11/5/2006 11:07:54 AM EDT
[#37]
It comes with a G3 claw mount (as well as a military issue carrying case, tinted lens, and cleaning kit).  Assuming that you want to mount it on a FAL, then you can sell the claw mount on the equipment exchange to finance the STANAG adapter that you will probably require.  If you already have a STANAG scope mount, then you won't need the adapter.

The illuminator takes what appear to be common watch batteries.  I have no idea how long a pair of batteries last, the sales literature doesn't say.

The Z24 is a nice scope, but keep in mind that it is a decades' old design.  However, I feel that what you don't get in updated features (newer designs tend to feature larger fields of view), you get in quality.
11/5/2006 11:11:07 AM EDT
[#38]
Yes; the first thing I noticed when I looked through my Z24 was the somewhat narrow FOV.
11/5/2006 11:20:12 AM EDT
[#39]
http://ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=7&f=23&t=388430
11/8/2006 12:40:43 AM EDT
[#40]
Anyone tried a Leatherwood M-600 scope on their FAL?
Armory Sponsor