Armory Sponsor
THE KAC HANDGUARD PICTURE THREAD (Page 2 of 7)
|
Little bit of everything. URX 2, 3, 3.1, 4, RIS Attached File Attached File A better pic of the URX3 with 13" barrel. Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By Daggertt: Little bit of everything. URX 2, 3, 3.1, 4, RIS https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/435611/Screenshot_20210731-222420_Photo_Editor_-2397448.JPGhttps://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/435611/20210129_175232_jpg-2397449.JPG A better pic of the URX3 with 13" barrel. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/435611/20210830_120140_jpg-2397450.JPG How did you mount that VFG to the URX3.1 without a picatinny section? The black one 10.5"ish one in the middle |
|
Originally Posted By bleaman225: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/218654/FCA29FD6-9273-4382-B767-04A0953F4AE2_jpe-2397388.JPG Those dimples...
|
|
Originally Posted By Fushaw: Good to know. I'll have to give that a try. Standard screws that come with the VFG and everything? Originally Posted By Fushaw: Originally Posted By Daggertt: Just grind off the mlok tabs. The hole spacing of the magpul mlok vfg is identical to the kac rails. Good to know. I'll have to give that a try. Standard screws that come with the VFG and everything? |
|
Attached File 30005-3 URX3 12.5 |
FOR THE GLORY OF THE EMPIRE
SO SAY WE ALL
SO SAY WE ALL
Member
Joined:
Feb 2022
Posts:
2218
EE: 100% (89)
|
Originally Posted By TripleB: https://i.imgur.com/hlNxbWRl.jpg https://i.imgur.com/kgBWwfsl.jpg URX 2 10 3/4 Cut down from a longer handguard? |
FOR THE GLORY OF THE EMPIRE
SO SAY WE ALL
SO SAY WE ALL
|
Originally Posted By HD2006: Now to figure out how to put this thing on ![]() https://i.imgur.com/0aWNQNN.jpg Easy. Send it to me and I'll install it in my safe. |
God will not look you over for medals, diplomas, or degrees – but for scars
|
SR-15 CQB upper/NX8 and a home build with a 13” URX 4 and a 14.5” Proof CF barrel/ATACR. Attached File 13.5” SR25 URX 4 w/an 18” .308 barrel. It’s since been rebuilt with a 16” WC 6.5C barrel. Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By WUPHF: SR-15 CQB upper/NX8 and a home build with a 13" URX 4 and a 14.5" Proof CF barrel/ATACR. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/294984/9B51420E-3537-478E-9DD8-42922545117B_jpe-2642926.JPG |
|
Originally Posted By Daggertt: Someday I'll be able to find a urx 4 13" Originally Posted By Daggertt: Originally Posted By WUPHF: SR-15 CQB upper/NX8 and a home build with a 13" URX 4 and a 14.5" Proof CF barrel/ATACR. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/294984/9B51420E-3537-478E-9DD8-42922545117B_jpe-2642926.JPG Yeah, I’ve had it for a few years now. Haven’t seen one retail for a long time and second hand market is ridiculous. Sadly, with KACs current backlog, we may well be on to the next big thing before we ever see components readily available again (as much as you could ever say that about KAC parts). |
|
I love secret service clones. They’re good looking rifles. I’m going to use the mid length 3.1 to do another with a LW barrel. |
Member
Joined:
Jun 2022
Posts:
2321
EE: 100% (3)
|
Originally Posted By Daggertt: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/435611/rogue_1_JPG-2835599.JPG That PA optic is very good looking. What are your thoughts on it? |
|
Originally Posted By Eyekahn: That PA optic is very good looking. What are your thoughts on it? I like the design of the scope and the reticle. I don't need 1x because I'm using the red dot, and 10x is a decent mid range magnification level, but I wanted to be able to adjust the parallax and also be able to use the grid reticle at magnifications other than max, so ffp was necessary. It's relatively lightweight compared to other scopes with similar features. the chevron reticle doesn't bother me, but I'm not using it as a precision optic. I also never dial, so I'm glad it has locking turrets. Overall, it had the features I wanted. I picked it up used on the EE for $500 so the price was right, as well. |
|
Originally Posted By Daggertt: Thanks, its a 2.5-10x for those that don't recognize it. I don't have time behind nightforce and the fancy glass some of you guys typically post pics of, so I don't know how you'd feel about it. But the glass looks good to me. I like the design of the scope and the reticle. I don't need 1x because I'm using the red dot, and 10x is a decent mid range magnification level, but I wanted to be able to adjust the parallax and also be able to use the grid reticle at magnifications other than max, so ffp was necessary. It's relatively lightweight compared to other scopes with similar features. the chevron reticle doesn't bother me, but I'm not using it as a precision optic. I also never dial, so I'm glad it has locking turrets. Overall, it had the features I wanted. I picked it up used on the EE for $500 so the price was right, as well. Very cool. I was looking at the 3-18 with the mil reticle for my bolt gun. |
|
More details on the 6!!! |
THE KAC HANDGUARD PICTURE THREAD (Page 2 of 7)
Armory Sponsor

















































