Armory Sponsor
Posted: 2/8/2009 7:38:41 PM EDT
| Has anybody had any issues with this mount on a Springfield M1A standard. Issues with it not fitting well or ejection issues? I've heard good things about this mount and the price is right. I've heard the the springfield receivers aren't mil-spec and I want to make sure that I get a mount that will make a soild platform. |
| My old man liked the ARMS mount, but their throw lever rings were shit. when set on the mount, it could be moved forward or back a little bit. Enough to throw off accuracy. HE has to make sure he's either pushing forward or back when he clamps it, otherwise the accuracy suffers. |
|
Personally I have never had an issue, but yes, SAInc put out some recivers that the geometery was off and affected the scope mounts. I have M1As from s/n 50,xxx - 200,000 and they have all worked great w/ ARMS #18 mounts.
Right now I have a couple of range rifles: a Bush s/n 156,xxx and a Loaded s/n 207,xxx that have the #18s and both hold zero great.... Like someone else asked, what is the s/n? There is a pretty accurate list of the s/n range that has had issues mounting scopes.... |
|
have the ARMS 18 on my M1A NM ( 2007) no problem at all, I use also ARMS # 22 rings same no issues - two week ago took apart the rifle for the yearly cleaning, mounted back everything an at 100 yard I have to correct the scope just 2 clicks
too me not bad at all |
Armory Sponsor