Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
4/19/2006 6:09:13 PM EDT
I just finished watching the Mythbusters where they fired guns in the air to see if the falling bullets could be fatal.  Pretty interesting, but I'm trying to figure out when the M1 Garand became an assault rifle?  I guess because they're in CA.  It just depresses me because they try so hard to get everything else right and then refer to the M1 as an assault rifle.
4/19/2006 7:44:58 PM EDT
[#1]
Though I like to watch the various Discovery and Learning Channels, I am always aware the target audience is liberal, yuppie, Commocrats!
4/19/2006 8:14:00 PM EDT
[#2]
Hey, in its time the Garand was every bit the assault rifle. Just like the 1853 Enfield was during the civil war. The term just hadn't been invented yet. Our nitpicking ways of saying "Oh, no , this is a battle rifle cuz it shoots a .30 caliber." and all the assault rifle/ battle rifle crap is more the result of bored gun people putting too much thought into minor crap.

I don't care what the Mythbusters crew want to call em, at least you can tell they like messing with firearms and don't try to make them evil or anything.
4/19/2006 8:15:15 PM EDT
[#3]
Hey i watched that show tonight and i am not a LIB.




Noctice how they did not find the 30.06 rounds that were fired....
4/19/2006 8:15:43 PM EDT
[#4]
That guy Jamie claims to have been in the special forces...you know the dude with the beard and the crazy hat haha

I don't know if its true, but the show said he had been in a narrated part I saw one time.  Hence he knows a little about weapons.  Anyone think its bs?  
4/19/2006 8:20:51 PM EDT
[#5]
The show is shoot in/they live in San Francisco,
What do you really need to know after that?
4/19/2006 9:19:13 PM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:
The show is shoot in/they live in San Francisco,
What do you really need to know after that?


Umm! well , 2 guys , san francisco, one is femanine and ones somewhat man! lol!!
Hell you tell me!!lol!!
4/19/2006 10:31:09 PM EDT
[#7]
Is that yummy little red haired chickee snack still on the show?
4/19/2006 10:40:43 PM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:
That guy Jamie claims to have been in the special forces...you know the dude with the beard and the crazy hat haha

I don't know if its true, but the show said he had been in a narrated part I saw one time.  Hence he knows a little about weapons.  Anyone think its bs?  




Possibly, but can't find anything.


Hailing from Indiana farm country, Jamie Hyneman is a multifaceted man: wilderness survival expert, boat captain, diver, linguist, animal wrangler, machinist and chef, to name a few. His career has been equally diverse: Jamie earned a degree in Russian languages and literature and ran a sailing/diving charter business in the Caribbean for several years before he moved over to the visual-effects industry.


Mythbusters
4/20/2006 3:04:30 AM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:

Quoted:
The show is shoot in/they live in San Francisco,
What do you really need to know after that?


Umm! well , 2 guys , san francisco, one is femanine and ones somewhat man! lol!!
Hell you tell me!!lol!!




I thought they loved steel and hard wood in San Francisco
4/20/2006 3:15:06 AM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:
The show is shoot in/they live in San Francisco,
What do you really need to know after that?



4/20/2006 3:27:49 AM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:

Quoted:
The show is shoot in/they live in San Francisco,
What do you really need to know after that?



photos.ar15.com/ImageGallery/Attachments/DownloadAttach.asp?iImageUnq=45841



4/20/2006 3:31:36 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:

Quoted:
The show is shoot in/they live in San Francisco,
What do you really need to know after that?



photos.ar15.com/ImageGallery/Attachments/DownloadAttach.asp?iImageUnq=45841



that got to be the funnies thing i've seen.   So what did they do fire into the air and then run around like a couple ferry's and hope the other didn't get hit
4/20/2006 2:14:25 PM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:
Is that yummy little red haired chickee snack still on the show?



OOOh yeah. Shes a smoker.

They have some issues with the scientific method. And don't even get me started about the other side kicks.... Sulu and Fuckov.


Still, they do not seem to go out of their way to demonize firearms.  In fact It seees they have increased the # of gun related Myths since the first season. Must be because of positive feedback.

They need a fact checker like crazy though.

Love that redhead.


JR
4/20/2006 2:45:02 PM EDT
[#14]
The rifle is actually a semi-automatic machinegun...
4/20/2006 3:20:24 PM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:

Quoted:
The show is shoot in/they live in San Francisco,
What do you really need to know after that?



photos.ar15.com/ImageGallery/Attachments/DownloadAttach.asp?iImageUnq=45841



HAHAHAHAH THATS AWESOME! Ima send that to wifey and see if she takes the hint.
4/20/2006 3:48:18 PM EDT
[#16]

Quoted:
That guy Jamie claims to have been in the special forces...you know the dude with the beard and the crazy hat haha

I don't know if its true, but the show said he had been in a narrated part I saw one time.  Hence he knows a little about weapons.  Anyone think its bs?  



I'm pretty sure that was just a joke mentioned in passing on one of the episodes...not serious. I think I recall that comment.
4/20/2006 3:50:46 PM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:
I just finished watching the Mythbusters where they fired guns in the air to see if the falling bullets could be fatal.


....and?
4/20/2006 4:55:02 PM EDT
[#18]
Yeah, what was their conclusion?  Ballistics says that if it trakes a certain amount of energy to get the bullet to the top of its arc, it'll have about the same amount of energy when it comes back down.
4/20/2006 4:56:36 PM EDT
[#19]
It could also be because they used the M1 for the Jaws Episode. They're probably too lazy/cheap to get another gun.
4/20/2006 5:19:01 PM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:
Yeah, what was their conclusion?  Ballistics says that if it trakes a certain amount of energy to get the bullet to the top of its arc, it'll have about the same amount of energy when it comes back down.


That is only true in highschool physics.  In reality, there's wind resistance, which limits the terminal velocity.  Though, my guess as to a bullet's terminal velocity would be something like 300-400 FPS... definitely enough to badly hurt if not kill someone.  That's my guess.
4/20/2006 6:49:30 PM EDT
[#21]
Paintballs move in the 300-400 FPS range...
4/20/2006 6:53:17 PM EDT
[#22]
Hey!!

So what was the Myth Busters conclusion??
4/20/2006 7:50:43 PM EDT
[#23]
When did Jamie say he was a tabbed SF operator? Never heard him say that yet!

Conclusion was that:
a. bullets fired into the sky do kill people
b. However bullets fired straight up (ie 90 degrees) will return to earth at its terminal velocity which is supposedly not that fast - in the 150 ft/sec range. "Non lethal" in their view. (However I would not want to test that out).

So it was Busted, Plausible, and Confirmed...
4/21/2006 7:51:54 AM EDT
[#24]

Quoted:
Paintballs move in the 300-400 FPS range...


Yeah, but that's because they're propelled at that speed, their terminal velocity, due to wind resistance would be much lower than a lead bullet because paintballs are less dense than lead.


Quoted:
When did Jamie say he was a tabbed SF operator? Never heard him say that yet!

Conclusion was that:
a. bullets fired into the sky do kill people
b. However bullets fired straight up (ie 90 degrees) will return to earth at its terminal velocity which is supposedly not that fast - in the 150 ft/sec range. "Non lethal" in their view. (However I would not want to test that out).

So it was Busted, Plausible, and Confirmed...


I don't get it, they're saying it'll only kill someone if it's fired at an angle?  Well no shit!  If you fire at 45 degrees, of course it's going to come down with a lot of force, but I find it hard to believe that a bullet's terminal velocity is 150FPS.

If the terminal velocity of lead (which, I have to assume is a little more dense than a sky diver) is only 150FPS (about 100MPH).  Last I checked, sky divers fall that fast.  A lead bullet would have a much higher terminal velocity!
4/21/2006 7:57:28 AM EDT
[#25]
Now just because it runs out of momentum does that mean it would also lose it's rotational energy?   What I'm getting at is the rifle bullet spins pretty friggen fast out a rifled barrel.   If it continued it's spin on descent it would point straight down and it's terminal velocity would be increased because it's more streamlined...... no?
4/21/2006 7:58:46 AM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:
When did Jamie say he was a tabbed SF operator? Never heard him say that yet!


Not sure but I believe hearing it mentioned.  I would like to do research on this.  
4/21/2006 8:28:19 AM EDT
[#27]

Quoted:
Now just because it runs out of momentum does that mean it would also lose it's rotational energy?   What I'm getting at is the rifle bullet spins pretty friggen fast out a rifled barrel.   If it continued it's spin on descent it would point straight down and it's terminal velocity would be increased because it's more streamlined...... no?


Nah, I think the heaviest end would be pointed down.  By the time it hit the peak, I doubt it'd be spinning much at all.

I asked my skydiver friend how fast people can fall when sky diving.  He said he's hit 240MPH, and he knows a guy who hit 285MPH (head first of course), but even when they're on their belly, they still fall around 120MPH.  Though, at 15,000ft, air is about half as dense, but then again, he said it's not TOO big of a difference between the speed you fall higher up and the speed you fall lower down.

I just don't believe 150FPS (100MPH), that's nonsense.

He said he'd test it out... though, I wish I would have seen the Mythbusters episode.
4/21/2006 4:26:35 PM EDT
[#28]
The bullet should still be spinning and still pointing point-forward.  Firing at ANY oblique angle (less than 90º) is what we do at the range, though we do tend to fire at very low angles.  Say you fire at 45º (which is not necessarily the angle that will get you the most range).  The bullet will slow down through air resistance somewhat, but it will still be going pretty darn fast when it either a) hits the ground or b) hits something other than the ground.  Angles higher than 45º will travel less linear distance before they fall to the ground, and expend more and more of their initial energy overcoming gravity as the angle increases.

I still don't see a streamlined, rotating bullet fired at near 90º encountering enough air resistance to slow it down to "terminal velocity."  I need a physics teacher to draw pictures of that for me to understand it.
4/21/2006 7:30:40 PM EDT
[#29]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Paintballs move in the 300-400 FPS range...


Yeah, but that's because they're propelled at that speed, their terminal velocity, due to wind resistance would be much lower than a lead bullet because paintballs are less dense than lead.


Quoted:
When did Jamie say he was a tabbed SF operator? Never heard him say that yet!

Conclusion was that:
a. bullets fired into the sky do kill people
b. However bullets fired straight up (ie 90 degrees) will return to earth at its terminal velocity which is supposedly not that fast - in the 150 ft/sec range. "Non lethal" in their view. (However I would not want to test that out).

So it was Busted, Plausible, and Confirmed...


I don't get it, they're saying it'll only kill someone if it's fired at an angle?  Well no shit!  If you fire at 45 degrees, of course it's going to come down with a lot of force, but I find it hard to believe that a bullet's terminal velocity is 150FPS.

If the terminal velocity of lead (which, I have to assume is a little more dense than a sky diver) is only 150FPS (about 100MPH).  Last I checked, sky divers fall that fast.  A lead bullet would have a much higher terminal velocity!

That is completely wrong. The mass or density of an object does not affect how fast something falls. EVERYTHING accelerates toward the earth at 9.81 meters per second squared in vacuum. The only thing that varies this rate of descent is air resistance, which depends on the object's shape. This will determine the terminal velocity of an object. The more aerodynamic it is, the faster its terminal velocity will be.

A bullet is very aerodyamic when it's traveling point first, but bullets fall sideways. They confirmed this on mythbusters--both by observation in a vertical wind tunnel and by finding oblong bullet holes in the dirt when they fired them straight up.

Their wind tunnel test was legit--the bullets tested max out at around 150 fps when falling through the air.
4/21/2006 7:34:40 PM EDT
[#30]
In short... was the myth true or false?
4/22/2006 9:14:34 AM EDT
[#31]
Did everyone notice the editing seemed like much more than eight rounds were fired yet there was only one clip ejection ping at the very end?  I only saw it once, and was grumpy from the "assault" reference.


Throughout all of the episodes, it is obvious they have neglected engineering and science for entertainment.  It's more interesting than most other TV, sadly.
4/22/2006 2:39:56 PM EDT
[#32]
was that a shoe string they were using to the pull the trigger?
4/22/2006 2:46:52 PM EDT
[#33]

Quoted:

Quoted:
When did Jamie say he was a tabbed SF operator? Never heard him say that yet!


Not sure but I believe hearing it mentioned.  I would like to do research on this.  



he's never claimed any military service AFAIK
on the other hand, people have been spreading rumors, and myths that he was a SEAL since day one of the show
4/22/2006 2:55:42 PM EDT
[#34]
I don't give a damn what some lame ass TV show states as fact.

I will trust the research of Julian S. Hatcher.

(pic to be added later...)
4/22/2006 3:53:30 PM EDT
[#35]

Quoted:

Quoted:
The show is shoot in/they live in San Francisco,
What do you really need to know after that?



photos.ar15.com/ImageGallery/Attachments/DownloadAttach.asp?iImageUnq=45841



Armory Sponsor