Armory Sponsor
Posted: 8/10/2017 11:56:04 AM EDT
|
Anyone know of a Weaver type base, or base set for M92's? I ordered a Weaver 418 per a suggestion, but their underside radius is way larger than the .357's barrel diameter radius at the front two factory threaded holes.
Also, the factory treaded holes for the scope's rear base attachment are so close to the breach, that the Leupold's eyepiece overhangs because they caution not to secure a ring any closer than 3/4" in front of the ocular bell. So I ordered a Weaver Extended Scope Ring Set to move the scope forward. Any and all suggestions welcomed. |
|
An update to where I am at now:
Chippa recommended a Weaver #418 scope base set so I order a set in. However the included 8-40 oval head screws were too big for the Huntsman's thread holes. The correct size is 6-48. I have some of those from my Brownells screw kit, so I've verified this. Also ordered a Weaver off-set scope ring kit in order to move the 2.5x Leupold's eye piece forward of the open breech. Seems the scope's mounting instructions include a warning not to ring the scope body any closer than 1/2 inch in front of the ocular bell. This results in the scope being pushed rearwards with convention 'straight up' type scope rings. Of course, a longer one-piece scope base would solve this more efficiently, and if I ever find a longer Weaver base with the right underside radius, I'll go with that. That will lower the scope more where I want it as well. Also, there is a lot of barrel diameter taper between the barrel's rear cope base mounting holes and the front pair. So I've made some shims to 'level' the front base with the rear as much as possible when I finally get the Skinner Rear Peep sight screws loose. And since Leupold's are shipped with their reticles dead-center, my plan is to zero the scope for elevation by shimming under the front base before securing screws with thread locker. When I get done, I'll post photos... |
Armory Sponsor
