Armory Sponsor
Posted: 3/25/2012 9:10:26 PM EDT
| Can anyone tell me if the standard version is worth the extra money? Also, weight difference aside what are the pros and cons of each? Any advice/help is appreciated. Thanks. |
| Yes i am also interested. I will forgo the standard model in lieu of the lightweight version because i plan on adding the advanced stock and the front rail system. I believe if i change these parts, i would then be removing the cheap plastic parts that are found on the light weight verson. (the stock and forward shroud). Unless im leaving out another part that is different on the light weight version? |
|
Quoted:
Yes i am also interested. I will forgo the standard model in lieu of the lightweight version because i plan on adding the advanced stock and the front rail system. I believe if i change these parts, i would then be removing the cheap plastic parts that are found on the light weight verson. (the stock and forward shroud). Unless im leaving out another part that is different on the light weight version? The receiver itself is plastic on the lightweight version. |
The only difference between the standard weight and light weight is that the light weight has a polymer receiver and cocking tube housing, making the gun about 3 lb lighter and less in cost. All other features, stock, rail, shroud, hand guard, etc are the same parts between the two guns, take down is the same, internal design is the same as well. The receivers are the same mold between metal and poly. That's all! 
|
Armory Sponsor