[ARCHIVED THREAD] - M99 vs M95

Posted: 9/23/2011 6:39:48 AM EDT

Besides the detachable mag, is there any other feature or performance benefit of the Barrett M95 that justifies the $2000 premium?

Posted: 9/23/2011 9:45:11 AM EDT

[#1]

Your application for it is all. Are you sitting at a bench / on the ground, or running around mountains.

Posted: 9/25/2011 7:22:38 PM EDT

[#2]

I would stay the increased magazine size is really the only difference.

Posted: 9/26/2011 11:17:06 AM EDT

[#3]

IMO, the M99 gives the most bang for the buck out of the Barrett lineup.

Posted: 9/29/2011 7:54:37 AM EDT

[#4]

No matter how you look at it, the M99 is the better investment based on demand, economy, and follow up shots. If you think the 2K difference is crazy now, watch the difference in 10 years. Its like the difference in buying a 1970 dodge challenger 318 and a 1970 challenger 426. It was a 3k difference in 1970. Now look at the value difference. FYI if you bought the 426 model in 1970, the dealership offered no warranty!

Posted: 9/29/2011 10:14:12 AM EDT

[#5]

So this is a little off the subject but from what youre saying is that then the 82A1 is going to be worth significantly more than too?

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - M99 vs M95

Armory Sponsor

Warning

Confirm Action

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - M99 vs M95

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - M99 vs M95