Armory Sponsor
Posted: 6/30/2016 12:03:41 PM EDT
|
So I'm looking at doing some 41F panic buying and my local dealer has the following 45 cans in stock:
Ti-rant FDE for $629 Ti-rant M for $689 Octane HD for $729 It will be running on a FDE FNP Tactical for now but perhaps a 1911 later and maybe some 300BO subs and I have a Multi mount 9, Phantom .223 and a Sparrow so you know what I'm already working with. Please help me decide so I can call them back and buy while they still have stock. I'm leaning towards the FDE ti-rant but convince me. Thanks |
|
Quoted:
TiRant is a little quieter and mounts are harder to come by. Octane is easier to clean and more mounting options and possibilities. This. I've got two Octane 45's, a 45k, and four different TiRANT's (two 9, a 9s, and a 45s). The TiRANT's are quieter but the Octane's are easier to clean. Both are solid cans. Pick what's more important to you. |
|
Quoted:
So I'm looking at doing some 41F panic buying and my local dealer has the following 45 cans in stock: Ti-rant FDE for $629 Ti-rant M for $689 Octane HD for $729 It will be running on a FDE FNP Tactical for now but perhaps a 1911 later and maybe some 300BO subs and I have a Multi mount 9, Phantom .223 and a Sparrow so you know what I'm already working with. Please help me decide so I can call them back and buy while they still have stock. I'm leaning towards the FDE ti-rant but convince me. Thanks The TiRant FDE would look really nice on a 1911..specially with the TiRant Short Piston: 
|
|
Quoted:
Ti-Rant M Ti-Rant 45M is 2-3dB quieter than the standard Ti-Rant 45 due to a couple improvements.  With our testing (we are sure outhers will complain or dispute) it's one of the quietest pistol silencers we have ever tested if your into that.
And yes it does take longer to clean by about 60-90 seconds... |
|
Quoted:
Ti-Rant 45M is 2-3dB quieter than the standard Ti-Rant 45 due to a couple improvements. With our testing (we are sure outhers will complain or dispute) it's one of the quietest pistol silencers we have ever tested if your into that.
And yes it does take longer to clean by about 60-90 seconds... Quoted:
Quoted:
Ti-Rant M Ti-Rant 45M is 2-3dB quieter than the standard Ti-Rant 45 due to a couple improvements. With our testing (we are sure outhers will complain or dispute) it's one of the quietest pistol silencers we have ever tested if your into that.
And yes it does take longer to clean by about 60-90 seconds... Any chance at being able to upgrade a Ti-Rant 45 to Ti-Rant 45M ? |
|
Quoted:
Correct me if I'm wrong, Octane 45 has17-4 stainless baffles, TR M has aluminum baffles. If that matters to you. Me bought some TRM 45 and Obsidian 45, they are still in the NFA jail. Partially true. Edit: The AAC Ti-Rant 45M The base section (closest to the firearm) is 17-4 Stainless Steel, the short, end section is 7075 T6 Aluminum, down where there is almost zero blast wear. |
|
With the release of the Rugged Supressors Obsidian, all other .45ACP Supressors went obsolete... |
|
Quoted:
With the release of the Rugged Supressors Obsidian, all other .45ACP Supressors went obsolete... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgaggHoUWbA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsYzmWU7x6s No, definitely not obsolete. The obsidian does appear to be a great can though, and I'll probably end up with one at some point. |
|
Quoted:
No, definitely not obsolete. The obsidian does appear to be a great can though, and I'll probably end up with one at some point. Quoted:
Quoted:
With the release of the Rugged Supressors Obsidian, all other .45ACP Supressors went obsolete... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgaggHoUWbA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsYzmWU7x6s No, definitely not obsolete. The obsidian does appear to be a great can though, and I'll probably end up with one at some point. While the Obsidian appears to be a fine can, I'd hardly consider all others to be obsolete in comparison. I personally don't need, or necessarily want, a convertible suppressor can. Why not? Well, because I'll never use the full size configuration. In its K configuration, the Obsidian, from the data I could find, does not suppress as well as the Octane 45K. Why would I want to pay more for a feature that I'll never use, a can that would not suppress as well, and one that is over an ounce heavier in its K configuration? From my perspective, and my wants/needs, the Obsidian is actually inferior. Plus, I think it's pretty darn ugly. |
|
Quoted:
While the Obsidian appears to be a fine can, I'd hardly consider all others to be obsolete in comparison. I personally don't need, or necessarily want, a convertible suppressor can. Why not? Well, because I'll never use the full size configuration. In its K configuration, the Obsidian, from the data I could find, does not suppress as well as the Octane 45K. Why would I want to pay more for a feature that I'll never use, a can that would not suppress as well, and one that is over an ounce heavier in its K configuration? From my perspective, and my wants/needs, the Obsidian is actually inferior. Plus, I think it's pretty darn ugly. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
With the release of the Rugged Supressors Obsidian, all other .45ACP Supressors went obsolete... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgaggHoUWbA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsYzmWU7x6s No, definitely not obsolete. The obsidian does appear to be a great can though, and I'll probably end up with one at some point. While the Obsidian appears to be a fine can, I'd hardly consider all others to be obsolete in comparison. I personally don't need, or necessarily want, a convertible suppressor can. Why not? Well, because I'll never use the full size configuration. In its K configuration, the Obsidian, from the data I could find, does not suppress as well as the Octane 45K. Why would I want to pay more for a feature that I'll never use, a can that would not suppress as well, and one that is over an ounce heavier in its K configuration? From my perspective, and my wants/needs, the Obsidian is actually inferior. Plus, I think it's pretty darn ugly. The DB in the K configuration is about the same; the Surge is shorter than the the Octane 45K. As for being more expensive I just paid $655 for an Obsidian about the same as I did for my Revo 45. |
|
Quoted:
The DB in the K configuration is about the same; the Surge is shorter than the the Octane 45K. As for being more expensive I just paid $655 for an Obsidian about the same as I did for my Revo 45. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
With the release of the Rugged Supressors Obsidian, all other .45ACP Supressors went obsolete... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgaggHoUWbA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsYzmWU7x6s No, definitely not obsolete. The obsidian does appear to be a great can though, and I'll probably end up with one at some point. While the Obsidian appears to be a fine can, I'd hardly consider all others to be obsolete in comparison. I personally don't need, or necessarily want, a convertible suppressor can. Why not? Well, because I'll never use the full size configuration. In its K configuration, the Obsidian, from the data I could find, does not suppress as well as the Octane 45K. Why would I want to pay more for a feature that I'll never use, a can that would not suppress as well, and one that is over an ounce heavier in its K configuration? From my perspective, and my wants/needs, the Obsidian is actually inferior. Plus, I think it's pretty darn ugly. The DB in the K configuration is about the same; the Surge is shorter than the the Octane 45K. As for being more expensive I just paid $655 for an Obsidian about the same as I did for my Revo 45. Yeah the avg DB are the same, but, I guess it's the FRP that I didn't like about the Obsidian. |
Armory Sponsor